Hexagon (target/hexagon) fix bug in mem_noshuf load exception

The semantics of a mem_noshuf packet are that the store effectively
happens before the load.  However, in cases where the load raises an
exception, we cannot simply execute the store first.

This change adds a probe to check that the load will not raise an
exception before executing the store.

If the load is predicated, this requires special handling.  We check
the condition before performing the probe.  Since, we need the EA to
perform the check, we move the GET_EA portion inside CHECK_NOSHUF_PRED.

Test case added in tests/tcg/hexagon/mem_noshuf_exception.c

Suggested-by: Alessandro Di Federico <ale@rev.ng>
Suggested-by: Anton Johansson <anjo@rev.ng>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Simpson <tsimpson@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220707210546.15985-3-tsimpson@quicinc.com>

2 files changed, 147 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tests/tcg/hexagon/Makefile.target b/tests/tcg/hexagon/Makefile.target
index 23b9870534..96a4d7a614 100644
--- a/tests/tcg/hexagon/Makefile.target
+++ b/tests/tcg/hexagon/Makefile.target
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ HEX_TESTS += preg_alias
 HEX_TESTS += dual_stores
 HEX_TESTS += multi_result
 HEX_TESTS += mem_noshuf
+HEX_TESTS += mem_noshuf_exception
 HEX_TESTS += circ
 HEX_TESTS += brev
 HEX_TESTS += load_unpack
diff --git a/tests/tcg/hexagon/mem_noshuf_exception.c b/tests/tcg/hexagon/mem_noshuf_exception.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..08660ea3e1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/tcg/hexagon/mem_noshuf_exception.c
@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
+/*
+ *  Copyright(c) 2022 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
+ *
+ *  This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ *  it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ *  the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+ *  (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ *  This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ *  but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ *  MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ *  GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ *  You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ *  along with this program; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+ */
+
+/*
+ * Test the VLIW semantics of exceptions with mem_noshuf
+ *
+ * When a packet has the :mem_noshuf attribute, the semantics dictate
+ * That the load will get the data from the store if the addresses overlap.
+ * To accomplish this, we perform the store first.  However, we have to
+ * handle the case where the store raises an exception.  In that case, the
+ * store should not alter the machine state.
+ *
+ * We test this with a mem_noshuf packet with a store to a global variable,
+ * "should_not_change" and a load from NULL.  After the SIGSEGV is caught,
+ * we check * that the "should_not_change" value is the same.
+ *
+ * We also check that a predicated load where the predicate is false doesn't
+ * raise an exception and allows the store to happen.
+ */
+
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <sys/types.h>
+#include <fcntl.h>
+#include <setjmp.h>
+#include <signal.h>
+
+int err;
+int segv_caught;
+
+#define SHOULD_NOT_CHANGE_VAL        5
+int should_not_change = SHOULD_NOT_CHANGE_VAL;
+
+#define OK_TO_CHANGE_VAL        13
+int ok_to_change = OK_TO_CHANGE_VAL;
+
+static void __check(const char *filename, int line, int x, int expect)
+{
+    if (x != expect) {
+        printf("ERROR %s:%d - %d != %d\n",
+               filename, line, x, expect);
+        err++;
+    }
+}
+
+#define check(x, expect) __check(__FILE__, __LINE__, (x), (expect))
+
+static void __chk_error(const char *filename, int line, int ret)
+{
+    if (ret < 0) {
+        printf("ERROR %s:%d - %d\n", filename, line, ret);
+        err++;
+    }
+}
+
+#define chk_error(ret) __chk_error(__FILE__, __LINE__, (ret))
+
+jmp_buf jmp_env;
+
+static void sig_segv(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void *puc)
+{
+    check(sig, SIGSEGV);
+    segv_caught = 1;
+    longjmp(jmp_env, 1);
+}
+
+int main()
+{
+    struct sigaction act;
+    int dummy32;
+    long long dummy64;
+    void *p;
+
+    /* SIGSEGV test */
+    act.sa_sigaction = sig_segv;
+    sigemptyset(&act.sa_mask);
+    act.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO;
+    chk_error(sigaction(SIGSEGV, &act, NULL));
+    if (setjmp(jmp_env) == 0) {
+        asm volatile("r18 = ##should_not_change\n\t"
+                     "r19 = #0\n\t"
+                     "{\n\t"
+                     "    memw(r18) = #7\n\t"
+                     "    %0 = memw(r19)\n\t"
+                     "}:mem_noshuf\n\t"
+                      : "=r"(dummy32) : : "r18", "r19", "memory");
+    }
+
+    act.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
+    sigemptyset(&act.sa_mask);
+    act.sa_flags = 0;
+    chk_error(sigaction(SIGSEGV, &act, NULL));
+
+    check(segv_caught, 1);
+    check(should_not_change, SHOULD_NOT_CHANGE_VAL);
+
+    /*
+     * Check that a predicated load where the predicate is false doesn't
+     * raise an exception and allows the store to happen.
+     */
+    asm volatile("r18 = ##ok_to_change\n\t"
+                 "r19 = #0\n\t"
+                 "p0 = cmp.gt(r0, r0)\n\t"
+                 "{\n\t"
+                 "    memw(r18) = #7\n\t"
+                 "    if (p0) %0 = memw(r19)\n\t"
+                 "}:mem_noshuf\n\t"
+                  : "=r"(dummy32) : : "r18", "r19", "p0", "memory");
+
+    check(ok_to_change, 7);
+
+    /*
+     * Also check that the post-increment doesn't happen when the
+     * predicate is false.
+     */
+    ok_to_change = OK_TO_CHANGE_VAL;
+    p = NULL;
+    asm volatile("r18 = ##ok_to_change\n\t"
+                 "p0 = cmp.gt(r0, r0)\n\t"
+                 "{\n\t"
+                 "    memw(r18) = #9\n\t"
+                 "    if (p0) %1 = memd(%0 ++ #8)\n\t"
+                 "}:mem_noshuf\n\t"
+                  : "+r"(p), "=r"(dummy64) : : "r18", "p0", "memory");
+
+    check(ok_to_change, 9);
+    check((int)p, (int)NULL);
+
+    puts(err ? "FAIL" : "PASS");
+    return err ? EXIT_FAILURE : EXIT_SUCCESS;
+}