aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/stubs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>2023-05-15 16:06:39 +0300
committerJuan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>2023-05-18 18:40:51 +0200
commitdd42ce24a3cda4be3c839aceb91fdf85e31c194f (patch)
tree1e1cafd380c9f8b359757175ab09bfa591cde4eb /stubs
parent6c1e3906ce0bb414478d9c2c698bcbb6d2d28c63 (diff)
migration: split migration_incoming_co
Originally, migration_incoming_co was introduced by 25d0c16f625feb3b6 "migration: Switch to COLO process after finishing loadvm" to be able to enter from COLO code to one specific yield point, added by 25d0c16f625feb3b6. Later in 923709896b1b0 "migration: poll the cm event for destination qemu" we reused this variable to wake the migration incoming coroutine from RDMA code. That was doubtful idea. Entering coroutines is a very fragile thing: you should be absolutely sure which yield point you are going to enter. I don't know how much is it safe to enter during qemu_loadvm_state() which I think what RDMA want to do. But for sure RDMA shouldn't enter the special COLO-related yield-point. As well, COLO code doesn't want to enter during qemu_loadvm_state(), it want to enter it's own specific yield-point. As well, when in 8e48ac95865ac97d "COLO: Add block replication into colo process" we added bdrv_invalidate_cache_all() call (now it's called activate_all()) it became possible to enter the migration incoming coroutine during that call which is wrong too. So, let't make these things separate and disjoint: loadvm_co for RDMA, non-NULL during qemu_loadvm_state(), and colo_incoming_co for COLO, non-NULL only around specific yield. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru> Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20230515130640.46035-3-vsementsov@yandex-team.ru> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'stubs')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions