| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This improves the error message of the getblock and getblockstats rpc and prevents calls to
ReadRawBlockFromDisk(), which are unnecessary if we know
from the header nStatus field that the block is not available.
|
|
|
|
Exercising and verifying the following points:
1. An IBD node can sync headers from an AssumeUTXO node at
any time.
2. IBD nodes do not request historical blocks from AssumeUTXO
nodes while they are syncing the background-chain.
3. The assumeUTXO node dynamically adjusts the network services
it offers according to its state.
4. IBD nodes can fully sync from AssumeUTXO nodes after they
finish the background-chain sync.
|
|
Because AssumeUTXO nodes prioritize tip synchronization, they relay their local
address through the network before completing the background chain sync.
This, combined with the advertising of full-node service (NODE_NETWORK), can
result in an honest peer in IBD connecting to the AssumeUTXO node (while syncing)
and requesting an historical block the node does not have. This behavior leads to
an abrupt disconnection due to perceived unresponsiveness (lack of response)
from the AssumeUTXO node.
This lack of response occurs because nodes ignore getdata requests when they do
not have the block data available (further discussion can be found in PR 30385).
Fix this by refraining from signaling full-node service support while the
background chain is being synced. During this period, the node will only
signal 'NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED' support. Then, full-node ('NODE_NETWORK')
support will be re-enabled once the background chain sync is completed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This was fixed in commit b50554babdddf452acaa51bac757736766c70e81.
Also, address the typo nits from:
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29370#discussion_r1531789314
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30598#discussion_r1711982543
|
|
The Snapshot format version is updated to 2 to indicate this change.
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <*~=`'#}+{/-|&$^_@721217.xyz>
|
|
The error messages should never happen in normal operation. However, if
they do, they are helpful to return to the user to debug the issue. For
example, to notice a truncated file.
|
|
and add new test
d63ef738001fb69ce04134cc8645dcd1e1cbccd1 test: Add loadtxoutset test with tip on snapshot block (Fabian Jahr)
c2f86d4bcba290c33ed99383cc76380bb15ba384 test: Remove already resolved assumeutxo todo comments (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
The first commit removes three Todos that have been addressed previously (see commit message for details).
The second message resolves another todo by adding the missing test case. This is a special case of "the tip has more work than the snapshot" where the tip is the same block as the snapshot base block.
Related to #28648.
ACKs for top commit:
jrakibi:
ACK [d63ef73](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/d63ef738001fb69ce04134cc8645dcd1e1cbccd1)
achow101:
ACK d63ef738001fb69ce04134cc8645dcd1e1cbccd1
maflcko:
ACK d63ef738001fb69ce04134cc8645dcd1e1cbccd1
alfonsoromanz:
Re ACK d63ef738001fb69ce04134cc8645dcd1e1cbccd1
Tree-SHA512: 8d5a25fc0b26531db3a9740132694138f2103b7b42eeb1d4a64095bfc901c1372e23601c0855c7def84c8a4e185d10611e4e830c4e479f1b663ae6ed53abb130
|
|
a8e3af1a82dd584a1cc3ffbe587e66889f72e3c7 qa: Do not assume running `feature_asmap.py` from source directory (Hennadii Stepanov)
9bf7ca6cad888d460f57d249264dc0062025bb3f qa: Consider `cache` and `config.ini` relative to invocation directory (Hennadii Stepanov)
a0473442d1c22043f5a288bd9255c006fd85d947 scripted-diff: Add `__file__` argument to `BitcoinTestFramework.init()` (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR includes changes split from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30454. They improve the functional test framework, allowing users to [run individual functional tests](https://github.com/hebasto/bitcoin/issues/146) from the build directory in the new CMake-based build system.
This functionality is not available for out-of-source builds using the current Autotools-based build system, which always requires write permissions for the source directory. Nevertheless, this PR can be tested as suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30463#issuecomment-2232618421:
1. Make an out-of-source build:
```
$ ./autogen.sh
$ mkdir ../build && cd ../build
$ ../bitcoin/configure
$ make
```
2. Create a symlink in the build directory to a functional test:
```
$ ln --symbolic ../../../bitcoin/test/functional/wallet_disable.py ./test/functional/
```
3. Run this symlink:
```
$ ./test/functional/wallet_disable.py
```
The last command fails on the master branch:
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/hebasto/git/build/./test/functional/wallet_disable.py", line 31, in <module>
DisableWalletTest().main()
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/home/hebasto/git/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 106, in __init__
self.parse_args()
File "/home/hebasto/git/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 210, in parse_args
config.read_file(open(self.options.configfile))
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/home/hebasto/git/bitcoin/test/config.ini'
```
and succeeds with this PR.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
tested ACK a8e3af1a82dd584a1cc3ffbe587e66889f72e3c 🎨
glozow:
ACK a8e3af1a82dd584a1cc3ffbe587e66889f72e3c7, tested with the steps in op
stickies-v:
ACK a8e3af1a82dd584a1cc3ffbe587e66889f72e3c7
Tree-SHA512: 899e4efc09edec13ea3f5b47825d03173fb21d3569c360deda7fa6a56b99b4d24e09ad4f0883bad1ee926b1c706e47ba07c6a6160c63c07c82b3cf4ae5816e91
|
|
Also pulls out the guarding assert and calls it explicitly before the test function is called. This is already done before the existing call of the test function so it was not needed there.
|
|
- "Valid snapshot file, but referencing a snapshot block that turns out
to be invalid, or has an invalid parent" has been addressed in #30267
- "An ancestor of snapshot block" - If chain tip refers to blocks in this context then any successful load is addressing this because if we have synced past the snapshot base block we fail because we don't need assumeutxo anymore. And if this is about headers then this is the `test_headers_not_synced()` case.
- "A descendant of the snapshot block" - If this refers to blocks the
`test_snapshot_with_less_work()` addressed this and if it is just headers in this case again it would be represented in all of the successful loads in the test.
Co-authored-by: Alfonso Roman Zubeldia <alfonsoromanz24@gmail.com>
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i -e 's/\s*().main\s*()/(__file__).main()/' $(git ls-files test/functional/*.py)
sed -i -e 's/def __init__(self)/def __init__(self, test_file)/' test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
If the snapshot is not an ancestor of the most-work header (m_best_header),
syncing from that alternative chain should be prioritised.
Therefore don't accept loading a snapshot in this situation.
If that other chain turns out to be invalid, m_best_header
would be reset and loading the snapshot should be possible again.
Because of the work required to generate a conflicting headers chain,
this should only be possible under extreme circumstances, such as major forks.
|
|
divergent chain + test
5b7f70ba2661a194a3c476b81e03785feddb4e1c test: loadtxoutset in divergent chain with less work (Alfonso Roman Zubeldia)
d35efe1efc0dbeae0667baade2a40be08511c13e p2p: Start downloading historical blocks from common ancestor (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a test to cover the scenario of loading an assumeutxo snapshot when the current chain tip is not an ancestor of the snapshot block but has less work.
During the review process, a bug was discovered where blocks between the last common ancestor and the background tip were not being requested if the background tip was not an ancestor of the snapshot block. mzumsande suggested a fix (65343ec49a6b73c4197dfc38e1c2f433b0a3838a) to start downloading historical blocks from the last common ancestor to address this issue. This fix has been incorporated into the PR with a slight modification.
Related to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28648
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tACK 5b7f70ba2661a194a3c476b81e03785feddb4e1c
achow101:
ACK 5b7f70ba2661a194a3c476b81e03785feddb4e1c
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK 5b7f70ba2661a194a3c476b81e03785feddb4e1c
Tree-SHA512: f8957349686a6a1292165ea9e0fd8c912d21466072632a10f8ef9d852a5f430bc6b2a531e6884a4dbf2e3adb28b3d512b25919e78f5804a67320ef54c3b1aaf6
|
|
|
|
Add the possibility of giving more guidance to the creation of the
metadata and/or coins, so that the fuzzer gets the chance
to reach more error conditions in ActivateSnapshot and sometimes
successfully creates a valid snapshot.
This also changes the asserts for the success case that were outdated,
and only didn't result in a crash because the fuzzer wasn't able
to reach this code before.
|
|
2342b46c451658a418f8e28e50b2ad0e5abd284d test: Add coverage for getchaintxstats in assumeutxo context (Fabian Jahr)
faf2a6750b2da97a18c48a3acf9c9da2aebe86d0 rpc: Reorder getchaintxstats output (MarcoFalke)
fa2dada0c9ab61266bcca86fcd28ced873976916 rpc: Avoid getchaintxstats invalid results (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `getchaintxstats` RPC reply during AU background download may return non-zero, but invalid, values for `window_tx_count` and `txrate`.
For example, `txcount` may be zero for a to-be-downloaded block, but may be non-zero for an ancestor block which is already downloaded. Thus, the values returned may be negative (and cause intermediate integer sanitizer violations).
Also, `txcount` may be accurate for the snapshot base block, or a descendant of it. However it may be zero for an ancestor block that still needs to be downloaded. Thus, the values returned may be positive, but wrong.
Fix all issues by skipping the returned value if either `txcount` is unset (equal to zero).
Also, skip `txcount` in the returned value, if it is unset (equal to zero).
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29328
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
re-ACK 2342b46c451658a418f8e28e50b2ad0e5abd284d
achow101:
ACK 2342b46c451658a418f8e28e50b2ad0e5abd284d
mzumsande:
ACK 2342b46c451658a418f8e28e50b2ad0e5abd284d
Tree-SHA512: 931cecc40ee5dc0f96be728db7eb297155f8343076cd29c8b8c050c99fd1d568b80f54c9459a34ca7a9489c2474c729796d00eeb1934d6a9f7b4d6a53e3ec430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: Alfonso Roman Zubeldia <alfonsoromanz24@gmail.com>
|
|
Also changes the return type of ActiveSnapshot to allow returning the
error message to the user of the loadtxoutset RPC.
|
|
should not be loaded
df6dc2aaaeffc664006b86ee8c8797dc484ec40e test: Assumeutxo: snapshots with less work should not be loaded (Hernan Marino)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a test which checks that snapshots with less accumulated work than the node's active chain, should not be loaded and return with an error. Although in a different context of discussion the missing test was detect in a thread in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29394 (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29394#discussion_r1484122214)
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
utACK df6dc2aaaeffc664006b86ee8c8797dc484ec40e
kevkevinpal:
utACK [df6dc2a](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29428/commits/df6dc2aaaeffc664006b86ee8c8797dc484ec40e)
achow101:
ACK df6dc2aaaeffc664006b86ee8c8797dc484ec40e
alfonsoromanz:
Re ACK df6dc2aaaeffc664006b86ee8c8797dc484ec40e. Make is successful and the test passes.
Tree-SHA512: 07a394b4b288cc8ad3f66ed4e70dcda468db18113e9442eb7215cf491768432d55efaaa5b79d633094917e05475a30f0c5e4f64f8f2da293ba306891b4485560
|
|
|
|
metadata of dumptxoutset output
542e13b2937356810bda2c41be83c3b1675e2f2f rpc: Enhance metadata of the dumptxoutset output (Fabian Jahr)
4d8e5edbaa94805be41ae4c8aa2f4bf7aaa276fe assumeutxo: Add documentation on dumptxoutset serialization format (Fabian Jahr)
c14ed7f384075330361df636f40121cf25a066d6 assumeutxo: Add test for changed coin size value (Fabian Jahr)
de95953d870c41436de67d56c93259bc66fe1434 rpc: Optimize serialization disk space of dumptxoutset (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
The second attempt at implementing the `dumptxoutset` space optimization as suggested in #25675. Closes #25675.
This builds on the work done in #26045, addresses open feedback, adds some further improvements (most importantly usage of compact size), documentation, and an additional test.
The [original snapshot at height 830,000](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29551) came in at 10.82 GB. With this change, the same snapshot is 8.94 GB, a reduction of 17.4%.
This also enhances the metadata of the output file and adds the following data to allow for better error handling and make future upgrades easier:
- A newly introduced utxo set magic
- A version number
- The network magic
- The block height
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 542e13b2937356810bda2c41be83c3b1675e2f2f
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK 542e13b2937356810bda2c41be83c3b1675e2f2f
theStack:
ACK 542e13b2937356810bda2c41be83c3b1675e2f2f
Tree-SHA512: 0825d30e5c3c364062db3c6cbca4e3c680e6e6d3e259fa70c0c2b2a7020f24a47406a623582040988d5c7745b08649c31110df4c10656aa25f3f27eb35843d99
|
|
|
|
The following data is added:
- A newly introduced utxo set magic
- A version number
- The network magic
- The block height
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: Aurèle Oulès <aurele@oules.com>
Co-authored-by: TheCharlatan <seb.kung@gmail.com>
|
|
a snapshot twice
b259b0e8d360726b062c4b0453d1cf5a68e1933f [Test] Assumeutxo: ensure failure when importing a snapshot twice (Alfonso Roman Zubeldia)
Pull request description:
I am getting familiar with the `assume_utxo` tests and I found that the scenario of trying to activate a snapshot twice is not covered. This test is to ensure failure when loading a snapshot if there is already a snapshot-based chainstate.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK b259b0e8d360726b062c4b0453d1cf5a68e1933f
kevkevinpal:
tACK [b259b0e](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29973/commits/b259b0e8d360726b062c4b0453d1cf5a68e1933f)
achow101:
ACK b259b0e8d360726b062c4b0453d1cf5a68e1933f
rkrux:
tACK [b259b0e](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29973/commits/b259b0e8d360726b062c4b0453d1cf5a68e1933f)
Tree-SHA512: 3510861390d0e40cdad6861b728df04827a1b63e642f3d956aee66ed2770b1cb7e3aa3eb00c62eb9da0544703c943cc5296936c9ebfcac18c719741c354421bb
|
|
not open file
ee67bba76cca2355541f99bb731f58479981b29e test: added test coverage to loadtxoutset (kevkevin)
Pull request description:
The functional test coverage did not cover the rpc error of "Couldn't open file..." for loadtxoutset and this test adds coverage for it
This adds coverage to this line
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/rpc/blockchain.cpp#L2777
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
ACK ee67bba76cca2355541f99bb731f58479981b29e
davidgumberg:
LGTM ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30053/commits/ee67bba76cca2355541f99bb731f58479981b29e
rkrux:
ACK [ee67bba](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30053/commits/ee67bba76cca2355541f99bb731f58479981b29e)
alfonsoromanz:
ACK ee67bba76cca2355541f99bb731f58479981b29e. Code looks good to me. I also ran `test/functional/feature_assumeutxo.py` to make sure all tests passes, including this one.
tdb3:
ACK for ee67bba76cca2355541f99bb731f58479981b29e
Tree-SHA512: 210a7eb928f625d2a8d9acb63ee83cb4aaec9c267e5a0c52ad219c2935466e2cdc68667e30ad29566e6060981587e5bec42805d296f6e60f9b3b13f3330575f2
|
|
The functional test coverage did not cover the rpc error of Couldn't
open file for loadtxoutset and this test adds coverage for it
|
|
|
|
money_supply
You can use this tool to decode the utxo snapshot https://github.com/jrakibi/utxo-live
Here’s an overview of how it’s done:
The serialization forma for a UTXO in the snapshot is as follows:
1. Transaction ID (txid) - 32 bytes
2. Output Index (outnum)- 4 bytes
3. VARINT (code) - A varible-length integer encoding the height and whether the transaction is a coinbase. The format of this VARINT is (height << 1) | coinbase_flag.
4. VARINT (amount_v) - A variable-length integer that represents a compressed format of the output amount (in satoshis).
For the test cases mentioned:
* b"\x84\x58" - This value corresponds to a VARINT representing the height and coinbase flag. Once we decode this code, we can extract the height and coinbase using height = code_decoded >> 1 and coinbase = code_decoded & 0x01. In our case, with code_decoded = 728, it results in height = 364 and coinbase = 0.
* b"\xCA\xD2\x8F\x5A" - This byte sequence represents a compressed amount value. The decompression function takes this value and translates it into a full amount in satoshis. In our case, the decompression of this amount translates to a number larger than the maximum allowed value of coins (21 million BTC)
test:Validate UTXO snapshot with coin_height > base_height & amount > money_supply
test:Validate UTXO snapshot with coin_height > base_height & amount > money_supply
|
|
Co-authored-by: Fabian Jahr <fjahr@protonmail.com>
|
|
The extra `bilingual_str` argument of the fatal error notifications and
`node::AbortNode()` is often unused and when used usually contains the
same string as the message argument. It also seems to be confusing,
since it is not consistently used for errors requiring user action. For
example some assumeutxo fatal errors require the user to do something,
but are not translated.
So simplify the fatal error and abort node interfaces by only passing a
translated string. This slightly changes the fatal errors displayed to
the user.
Also de-duplicate the abort error log since it is repeated in noui.cpp.
|
|
Add a test for a CheckBlockIndex crash that would happen before previous
"assumeutxo: Get rid of faked nTx and nChainTx values" commit.
The crash was an assert failure in the (pindex->nChainTx == pindex->nTx +
prev_chain_tx) check that would previously happen if the snapshot block was
submitted after loading the snapshot and downloading a few blocks after the
snapshot. In that case ReceivedBlockTransactions() previously would overwrite
the nChainTx value of the submitted snapshot block with a fake value based on
the previous block, so the (pindex->nChainTx == pindex->nTx + prev_chain_tx)
check would later fail on the first block after the snapshot. This test was
originally posted by Martin Zumsande <mzumsande@gmail.com> in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29370#issuecomment-1974096225
Co-authored-by: Martin Zumsande <mzumsande@gmail.com>
|
|
Add a test for a CheckBlockIndex crash that would happen before previous
"assumeutxo: Get rid of faked nTx and nChainTx values" commit.
The crash was an assert failure in the (pindex->nChainTx == pindex->nTx +
prev_chain_tx) check that would previously happen if a snapshot was loaded, and
a block was submitted which forked from the chain before the snapshot block and
after the last downloaded background chain block. This block would not be
marked assumed-valid because it would not be an ancestor of the snapshot, and
it would have nTx set, nChainTx unset, and prev->nChainTx set with a fake
value, so the assert would fail. After the fix, prev->nChainTx is unset instead
of being set to a fake value, so the assert succeeds. This test was originally
posted by maflcko in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29261#issuecomment-1918947945
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <*~=`'#}+{/-|&$^_@721217.xyz>
|
|
The `PopulateAndValidateSnapshot` function introduced in
f6e2da5fb7c6406c37612c838c998078ea8d2252 from #19806 has been setting fake
`nTx` and `nChainTx` values that can show up in RPC results (see #29328) and
make `CBlockIndex` state hard to reason about, because it is difficult to know
whether the values are real or fake.
Revert to previous behavior of setting `nTx` and `nChainTx` to 0 when the
values are unknown, instead of faking them.
This commit fixes at least two assert failures in the (pindex->nChainTx ==
pindex->nTx + prev_chain_tx) check that would happen previously. Tests for
these failures are added separately in the next two commits.
Compatibility note: This change could result in -checkblockindex failures if a
snapshot was loaded by a previous version of Bitcoin Core and not fully
validated, because fake nTx values will have been saved to the block index. It
would be pretty easy to avoid these failures by adding some compatibility code
to `LoadBlockIndex` and changing `nTx` values from 1 to 0 when they are fake
(when `(pindex->nStatus & BLOCK_VALID_MASK) < BLOCK_VALID_TRANSACTIONS`), but a
little simpler not to worry about being compatible in this case.
|
|
The fake values will be removed in an upcoming commit, so it is useful to have
test coverage confirming the change in behavior.
|
|
|
|
The nodes are not connected at this point and no blocks have been mined, so it does not seem do anything
|
|
|
|
|
|
Check that an UTXO that is only available in the snapshot chainstate
is also visible to the mempool by submitting a spending transaction.
|
|
43de4d3630274e1287179c86896ed4c2d8b9eff4 doc: fix typos (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes typos found by lint-spelling.py using codespell 2.2.6.
Our CI linter job uses codespell 2.2.5 and found fewer typos that I did locally. In any case it's happy now.
ACKs for top commit:
pablomartin4btc:
re ACK 43de4d3630274e1287179c86896ed4c2d8b9eff4
Tree-SHA512: c032fe86cb49c924a468385653b31f309a9db68c478d70335bba3e65a1ff3826abe80284fe00a090ab5a509e1edbf17e476f6922fb15d055e50f1103dad2ccb0
|
|
This is a follow-up on the invalid hash dump fix PR #28698.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28698#pullrequestreview-1698178157
|
