aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--src/Makefile.test.include1
-rw-r--r--src/test/disconnected_transactions.cpp95
2 files changed, 96 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/Makefile.test.include b/src/Makefile.test.include
index d66f5bf53a..377ac184b2 100644
--- a/src/Makefile.test.include
+++ b/src/Makefile.test.include
@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ BITCOIN_TESTS =\
test/dbwrapper_tests.cpp \
test/denialofservice_tests.cpp \
test/descriptor_tests.cpp \
+ test/disconnected_transactions.cpp \
test/flatfile_tests.cpp \
test/fs_tests.cpp \
test/getarg_tests.cpp \
diff --git a/src/test/disconnected_transactions.cpp b/src/test/disconnected_transactions.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..d4dc124b7b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test/disconnected_transactions.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2023 The Bitcoin Core developers
+// Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
+// file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
+//
+#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp>
+#include <core_memusage.h>
+#include <kernel/disconnected_transactions.h>
+#include <test/util/setup_common.h>
+
+BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(disconnected_transactions, TestChain100Setup)
+
+//! Tests that DisconnectedBlockTransactions limits its own memory properly
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(disconnectpool_memory_limits)
+{
+ // Use the coinbase transactions from TestChain100Setup. It doesn't matter whether these
+ // transactions would realistically be in a block together, they just need distinct txids and
+ // uniform size for this test to work.
+ std::vector<CTransactionRef> block_vtx(m_coinbase_txns);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(block_vtx.size(), 100);
+
+ // Roughly estimate sizes to sanity check that DisconnectedBlockTransactions::DynamicMemoryUsage
+ // is within an expected range.
+
+ // Overhead for the hashmap depends on number of buckets
+ std::unordered_map<uint256, CTransaction*, SaltedTxidHasher> temp_map;
+ temp_map.reserve(1);
+ const size_t MAP_1{memusage::DynamicUsage(temp_map)};
+ temp_map.reserve(100);
+ const size_t MAP_100{memusage::DynamicUsage(temp_map)};
+
+ const size_t TX_USAGE{RecursiveDynamicUsage(block_vtx.front())};
+ for (const auto& tx : block_vtx)
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(RecursiveDynamicUsage(tx), TX_USAGE);
+
+ // Our overall formula is unordered map overhead + usage per entry.
+ // Implementations may vary, but we're trying to guess the usage of data structures.
+ const size_t ENTRY_USAGE_ESTIMATE{
+ TX_USAGE
+ // list entry: 2 pointers (next pointer and prev pointer) + element itself
+ + memusage::MallocUsage((2 * sizeof(void*)) + sizeof(decltype(block_vtx)::value_type))
+ // unordered map: 1 pointer for the hashtable + key and value
+ + memusage::MallocUsage(sizeof(void*) + sizeof(decltype(temp_map)::key_type)
+ + sizeof(decltype(temp_map)::value_type))};
+
+ // DisconnectedBlockTransactions that's just big enough for 1 transaction.
+ {
+ DisconnectedBlockTransactions disconnectpool{MAP_1 + ENTRY_USAGE_ESTIMATE};
+ // Add just 2 (and not all 100) transactions to keep the unordered map's hashtable overhead
+ // to a minimum and avoid all (instead of all but 1) transactions getting evicted.
+ std::vector<CTransactionRef> two_txns({block_vtx.at(0), block_vtx.at(1)});
+ auto evicted_txns{disconnectpool.AddTransactionsFromBlock(two_txns)};
+ BOOST_CHECK(disconnectpool.DynamicMemoryUsage() <= MAP_1 + ENTRY_USAGE_ESTIMATE);
+
+ // Only 1 transaction can be kept
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(1, evicted_txns.size());
+ // Transactions are added from back to front and eviction is FIFO.
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(block_vtx.at(1), evicted_txns.front());
+
+ disconnectpool.clear();
+ }
+
+ // DisconnectedBlockTransactions with a comfortable maximum memory usage so that nothing is evicted.
+ // Record usage so we can check size limiting in the next test.
+ size_t usage_full{0};
+ {
+ const size_t USAGE_100_OVERESTIMATE{MAP_100 + ENTRY_USAGE_ESTIMATE * 100};
+ DisconnectedBlockTransactions disconnectpool{USAGE_100_OVERESTIMATE};
+ auto evicted_txns{disconnectpool.AddTransactionsFromBlock(block_vtx)};
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(evicted_txns.size(), 0);
+ BOOST_CHECK(disconnectpool.DynamicMemoryUsage() <= USAGE_100_OVERESTIMATE);
+
+ usage_full = disconnectpool.DynamicMemoryUsage();
+
+ disconnectpool.clear();
+ }
+
+ // DisconnectedBlockTransactions that's just a little too small for all of the transactions.
+ {
+ const size_t MAX_MEMUSAGE_99{usage_full - sizeof(void*)};
+ DisconnectedBlockTransactions disconnectpool{MAX_MEMUSAGE_99};
+ auto evicted_txns{disconnectpool.AddTransactionsFromBlock(block_vtx)};
+ BOOST_CHECK(disconnectpool.DynamicMemoryUsage() <= MAX_MEMUSAGE_99);
+
+ // Only 1 transaction needed to be evicted
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(1, evicted_txns.size());
+
+ // Transactions are added from back to front and eviction is FIFO.
+ // The last transaction of block_vtx should be the first to be evicted.
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(block_vtx.back(), evicted_txns.front());
+
+ disconnectpool.clear();
+ }
+}
+
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()