Merge #18544: net: limit BIP37 filter lifespan (active between 'filterload'..'filterclear')

a9ecbdfcaa15499644d16e9c8ad2c63dfc45b37b test: add more inactive filter tests to p2p_filter.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
5eae034996b340c19cebab9efb6c89d20fe051ef net: limit BIP37 filter lifespan (active between 'filterload' and 'filterclear') (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  This PR fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18483. On the master branch, there is currently _always_ a BIP37 filter set for every peer: if not a specific filter is set through a `filterload` message, a default match-everything filter is instanciated and pointed to via the `CBloomFilter` default constructor; that happens both initially, when the containing structure `TxRelay` is constructed:

  https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/c0b389b33516fb3eaaad7c30bd11dba768882a7e/src/net.h#L812

  and after a loaded filter is removed again through a `filterclear` message:

  https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/c0b389b33516fb3eaaad7c30bd11dba768882a7e/src/net_processing.cpp#L3201

  The behaviour was introduced by commit https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/37c6389c5a0ca63ae3573440ecdfe95d28ad8f07 (an intentional covert fix for [CVE-2013-5700](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18515), according to gmaxwell).

  This default match-everything filter leads to some unintended side-effects:
  1. `getdata` request for filtered blocks (i.e. type `MSG_FILTERED_BLOCK`) are always responded to with `merkleblock`s, even if no filter was set by the peer, see issue #18483 (strictly speaking, this is a violation of BIP37) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/c0b389b33516fb3eaaad7c30bd11dba768882a7e/src/net_processing.cpp#L1504-L1507
  2. if a peer sends a `filteradd` message without having loaded a filter via `filterload` before, the intended increasing of the banscore never happens (triggered if `bad` is set to true, a few lines below) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/c0b389b33516fb3eaaad7c30bd11dba768882a7e/src/net_processing.cpp#L3182-L3186

  This PR basically activates the `else`-branch code paths for all checks of `pfilter` again (on the master branch, they are dead code) by limiting the pointer's lifespan: instead of always having a filter set, the `pfilter` is only pointing to a `CBloomFilter`-instance after receiving a `filterload` message and the instance is destroyed again (and the pointer nullified) after receiving a `filterclear` message.

  Here is a before/after comparison in behaviour:
  | code part / scenario                          |    master branch                   |   PR branch                                          |
  | --------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- |
  | `getdata` processing for `MSG_FILTERED_BLOCK` | always responds with `merkleblock` | only responds if filter was set via `filterload`     |
  | `filteradd` processing, no filter was loaded  | nothing                            | peer's banscore increases by 100 (i.e. disconnect)   |

  On the other code parts where `pfilter` is checked there is no change in the logic behaviour (except that `CBloomFilter::IsRelevantAndUpdate()` is unnecessarily called and immediately returned in the master branch).
  Note that the default constructor of `CBloomFilter` is only used for deserializing the received `filterload` message and nowhere else. The PR also contains a functional test checking that sending `getdata` for filtered blocks is ignored by the node if no bloom filter is set.

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    re-ACK a9ecbdfcaa, only change is in test code 🕙

Tree-SHA512: 1a656a6d74ccaf628e7fdca063ba63fbab2089e0b6d0a11be9bbd387c2ee6d3230706ff8ffc1a55711481df3d4547137dd7c9d9184d89eaa43ade4927792d0b6

1 files changed, 22 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/test/functional/p2p_filter.py b/test/functional/p2p_filter.py
index 2eeb03bfaa..3879f4ffe6 100755
--- a/test/functional/p2p_filter.py
+++ b/test/functional/p2p_filter.py
@@ -7,15 +7,17 @@ Test BIP 37
 """
 
 from test_framework.messages import (
+    CInv,
     MSG_BLOCK,
     MSG_FILTERED_BLOCK,
-    msg_getdata,
-    msg_filterload,
     msg_filteradd,
     msg_filterclear,
+    msg_filterload,
+    msg_getdata,
 )
 from test_framework.mininode import P2PInterface
 from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
+from test_framework.util import assert_equal
 
 
 class FilterNode(P2PInterface):
@@ -35,8 +37,9 @@ class FilterNode(P2PInterface):
         for i in message.inv:
             # inv messages can only contain TX or BLOCK, so translate BLOCK to FILTERED_BLOCK
             if i.type == MSG_BLOCK:
-                i.type = MSG_FILTERED_BLOCK
-            want.inv.append(i)
+                want.inv.append(CInv(MSG_FILTERED_BLOCK, i.hash))
+            else:
+                want.inv.append(i)
         if len(want.inv):
             self.send_message(want)
 
@@ -103,6 +106,21 @@ class FilterTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
             txid = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), 7)
             filter_node.wait_for_tx(txid)
 
+        self.log.info('Check that request for filtered blocks is ignored if no filter is set')
+        filter_node.merkleblock_received = False
+        filter_node.tx_received = False
+        with self.nodes[0].assert_debug_log(expected_msgs=['received getdata']):
+            block_hash = self.nodes[0].generatetoaddress(1, self.nodes[0].getnewaddress())[0]
+            filter_node.wait_for_inv([CInv(MSG_BLOCK, int(block_hash, 16))])
+            filter_node.sync_with_ping()
+            assert not filter_node.merkleblock_received
+            assert not filter_node.tx_received
+
+        self.log.info('Check that sending "filteradd" if no filter is set is treated as misbehavior (+100)')
+        assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getpeerinfo()[0]['banscore'], 0)
+        filter_node.send_and_ping(msg_filteradd(data=b'letsmisbehave'))
+        assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getpeerinfo()[0]['banscore'], 100)
+
         self.log.info("Check that division-by-zero remote crash bug [CVE-2013-5700] is fixed")
         filter_node.send_and_ping(msg_filterload(data=b'', nHashFuncs=1))
         filter_node.send_and_ping(msg_filteradd(data=b'letstrytocrashthisnode'))