diff options
author | Antoine Riard <ariard@student.42.fr> | 2019-10-14 01:00:51 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | ishaanam <ishaana.misra@gmail.com> | 2023-05-14 10:45:27 -0400 |
commit | 89df7987c2f1eea42454c2b0efc31a924fbfd3a8 (patch) | |
tree | a6cc4a63114aa76d87223eeeee9773035882d30c /test/functional | |
parent | dced203162d45e542f187f8d0d07dab85c52cf28 (diff) | |
download | bitcoin-89df7987c2f1eea42454c2b0efc31a924fbfd3a8.tar.xz |
Add wallets_conflicts
Test the case of a tx being conflicted by multiple
txs with different depths. The conflicted tx is also spent by
a child tx for which confirmation status is tied to the parent's.
After a reorg of conflicting txs, the conflicted status should be
undone properly.
Co-authored-by: furszy <mfurszy@protonmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'test/functional')
-rwxr-xr-x | test/functional/test_runner.py | 2 | ||||
-rwxr-xr-x | test/functional/wallet_conflicts.py | 127 |
2 files changed, 129 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/functional/test_runner.py b/test/functional/test_runner.py index bcedc0c9af..7076ad9576 100755 --- a/test/functional/test_runner.py +++ b/test/functional/test_runner.py @@ -192,6 +192,8 @@ BASE_SCRIPTS = [ 'wallet_watchonly.py --legacy-wallet', 'wallet_watchonly.py --usecli --legacy-wallet', 'wallet_reorgsrestore.py', + 'wallet_conflicts.py --legacy-wallet', + 'wallet_conflicts.py --descriptors', 'interface_http.py', 'interface_rpc.py', 'interface_usdt_coinselection.py', diff --git a/test/functional/wallet_conflicts.py b/test/functional/wallet_conflicts.py new file mode 100755 index 0000000000..802b718cd5 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/functional/wallet_conflicts.py @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python3 +# Copyright (c) 2023 The Bitcoin Core developers +# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying +# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php. + +""" +Test that wallet correctly tracks transactions that have been conflicted by blocks, particularly during reorgs. +""" + +from decimal import Decimal + +from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework +from test_framework.util import ( + assert_equal, +) + +class TxConflicts(BitcoinTestFramework): + def add_options(self, parser): + self.add_wallet_options(parser) + + def set_test_params(self): + self.num_nodes = 3 + + def skip_test_if_missing_module(self): + self.skip_if_no_wallet() + + def get_utxo_of_value(self, from_tx_id, search_value): + return next(tx_out["vout"] for tx_out in self.nodes[0].gettransaction(from_tx_id)["details"] if tx_out["amount"] == Decimal(f"{search_value}")) + + def run_test(self): + self.log.info("Send tx from which to conflict outputs later") + txid_conflict_from_1 = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), Decimal("10")) + txid_conflict_from_2 = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), Decimal("10")) + self.generate(self.nodes[0], 1) + self.sync_blocks() + + self.log.info("Disconnect nodes to broadcast conflicts on their respective chains") + self.disconnect_nodes(0, 1) + self.disconnect_nodes(2, 1) + + self.log.info("Create transactions that conflict with each other") + output_A = self.get_utxo_of_value(from_tx_id=txid_conflict_from_1, search_value=10) + output_B = self.get_utxo_of_value(from_tx_id=txid_conflict_from_2, search_value=10) + + # First create a transaction that consumes both A and B outputs. + # + # | tx1 | -----> | | | | + # | AB_parent_tx | ----> | Child_Tx | + # | tx2 | -----> | | | | + # + inputs_tx_AB_parent = [{"txid": txid_conflict_from_1, "vout": output_A}, {"txid": txid_conflict_from_2, "vout": output_B}] + tx_AB_parent = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs_tx_AB_parent, {self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(): Decimal("19.99998")})) + + # Secondly, create two transactions: One consuming output_A, and another one consuming output_B + # + # | tx1 | -----> | Tx_A_1 | + # ---------------- + # | tx2 | -----> | Tx_B_1 | + # + inputs_tx_A_1 = [{"txid": txid_conflict_from_1, "vout": output_A}] + inputs_tx_B_1 = [{"txid": txid_conflict_from_2, "vout": output_B}] + tx_A_1 = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs_tx_A_1, {self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(): Decimal("9.99998")})) + tx_B_1 = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs_tx_B_1, {self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(): Decimal("9.99998")})) + + self.log.info("Broadcast conflicted transaction") + txid_AB_parent = self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(tx_AB_parent["hex"]) + self.generate(self.nodes[0], 1, sync_fun=self.no_op) + + # Now that 'AB_parent_tx' was broadcast, build 'Child_Tx' + output_c = self.get_utxo_of_value(from_tx_id=txid_AB_parent, search_value=19.99998) + inputs_tx_C_child = [({"txid": txid_AB_parent, "vout": output_c})] + + tx_C_child = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs_tx_C_child, {self.nodes[0].getnewaddress() : Decimal("19.99996")})) + tx_C_child_txid = self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(tx_C_child["hex"]) + self.generate(self.nodes[0], 1, sync_fun=self.no_op) + + self.log.info("Broadcast conflicting tx to node 1 and generate a longer chain") + conflicting_txid_A = self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(tx_A_1["hex"]) + self.generate(self.nodes[1], 4, sync_fun=self.no_op) + conflicting_txid_B = self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(tx_B_1["hex"]) + self.generate(self.nodes[1], 4, sync_fun=self.no_op) + + self.log.info("Connect nodes 0 and 1, trigger reorg and ensure that the tx is effectively conflicted") + self.connect_nodes(0, 1) + self.sync_blocks([self.nodes[0], self.nodes[1]]) + conflicted_AB_tx = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid_AB_parent) + tx_C_child = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(tx_C_child_txid) + conflicted_A_tx = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(conflicting_txid_A) + + self.log.info("Verify, after the reorg, that Tx_A was accepted, and tx_AB and its Child_Tx are conflicting now") + # Tx A was accepted, Tx AB was not. + assert conflicted_AB_tx["confirmations"] < 0 + assert conflicted_A_tx["confirmations"] > 0 + + # Conflicted tx should have confirmations set to the confirmations of the most conflicting tx + assert_equal(-conflicted_AB_tx["confirmations"], conflicted_A_tx["confirmations"]) + # Child should inherit conflicted state from parent + assert_equal(-tx_C_child["confirmations"], conflicted_A_tx["confirmations"]) + # Check the confirmations of the conflicting transactions + assert_equal(conflicted_A_tx["confirmations"], 8) + assert_equal(self.nodes[0].gettransaction(conflicting_txid_B)["confirmations"], 4) + + self.log.info("Now generate a longer chain that does not contain any tx") + # Node2 chain without conflicts + self.generate(self.nodes[2], 15, sync_fun=self.no_op) + + # Connect node0 and node2 and wait reorg + self.connect_nodes(0, 2) + self.sync_blocks() + conflicted = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid_AB_parent) + tx_C_child = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(tx_C_child_txid) + + self.log.info("Test that formerly conflicted transaction are inactive after reorg") + # Former conflicted tx should be unconfirmed as it hasn't been yet rebroadcast + assert_equal(conflicted["confirmations"], 0) + # Former conflicted child tx should be unconfirmed as it hasn't been rebroadcast + assert_equal(tx_C_child["confirmations"], 0) + # Rebroadcast former conflicted tx and check it confirms smoothly + self.nodes[2].sendrawtransaction(conflicted["hex"]) + self.generate(self.nodes[2], 1) + self.sync_blocks() + former_conflicted = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid_AB_parent) + assert_equal(former_conflicted["confirmations"], 1) + assert_equal(former_conflicted["blockheight"], 217) + +if __name__ == '__main__': + TxConflicts().main() |