diff options
| author | fanquake <fanquake@gmail.com> | 2022-03-11 14:47:11 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | fanquake <fanquake@gmail.com> | 2022-03-11 15:00:38 +0000 |
| commit | 23e8c702bc95459861183cd9eb927272494a79ca (patch) | |
| tree | 216d8110104c7ef9544d573b9d3a25764d810495 /test/functional/wallet_startup.py | |
| parent | bb0b39ce6fdee0d1b379a3006528293b7f205f15 (diff) | |
| parent | 40e871d9b4e55f5b5f7ce2a89157cd3d9f152037 (diff) | |
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24421: miner: always assume we can build witness blocks
40e871d9b4e55f5b5f7ce2a89157cd3d9f152037 [miner] always assume we can create witness blocks (glozow)
Pull request description:
Given the low possibility of a reorg reverting the segwit soft fork, there is no longer a need to check whether segwit is active to see if it's okay to add to the block template (see also #23512, #21009, etc). `TestBlockValidity()` is also run on the block template at the end of `CreateNewBlock()`, so any invalid block would be caught there.
ACKs for top commit:
gruve-p:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24421/commits/40e871d9b4e55f5b5f7ce2a89157cd3d9f152037
jnewbery:
utACK 40e871d9b4, although I disagree about changing the test for segwit transaction in mempool before activagtion, instead of just removing it: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24421#discussion_r822933721.
achow101:
ACK 40e871d9b4e55f5b5f7ce2a89157cd3d9f152037
theStack:
Code-review ACK 40e871d9b4e55f5b5f7ce2a89157cd3d9f152037
Tree-SHA512: bf4860bf2bed8339622d05228d11d60286edb0c32a9a3c434b8d154913c07ea56e50649f4af7009c2a1c6a58a81d2299ab43b41a6f16dee7d08cc89cc1603019
Diffstat (limited to 'test/functional/wallet_startup.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions