test: Update python tests to use named parameters instead of options objects

1 files changed, 25 insertions, 25 deletions

diff --git a/test/functional/wallet_bumpfee.py b/test/functional/wallet_bumpfee.py
index 19c8022600..b9ebf64c22 100755
--- a/test/functional/wallet_bumpfee.py
+++ b/test/functional/wallet_bumpfee.py
@@ -123,36 +123,36 @@ class BumpFeeTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
             assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, "Unexpected key {}".format(key), rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, {key: NORMAL})
 
         # Bumping to just above minrelay should fail to increase the total fee enough.
-        assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Insufficient total fee 0.00000141", rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, {"fee_rate": INSUFFICIENT})
+        assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Insufficient total fee 0.00000141", rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, fee_rate=INSUFFICIENT)
 
         self.log.info("Test invalid fee rate settings")
         assert_raises_rpc_error(-4, "Specified or calculated fee 0.141 is too high (cannot be higher than -maxtxfee 0.10",
-            rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, {"fee_rate": TOO_HIGH})
+            rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, fee_rate=TOO_HIGH)
         # Test fee_rate with zero values.
         msg = "Insufficient total fee 0.00"
         for zero_value in [0, 0.000, 0.00000000, "0", "0.000", "0.00000000"]:
-            assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, msg, rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, {"fee_rate": zero_value})
+            assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, msg, rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, fee_rate=zero_value)
         msg = "Invalid amount"
         # Test fee_rate values that don't pass fixed-point parsing checks.
         for invalid_value in ["", 0.000000001, 1e-09, 1.111111111, 1111111111111111, "31.999999999999999999999"]:
-            assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, msg, rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, {"fee_rate": invalid_value})
+            assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, msg, rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, fee_rate=invalid_value)
         # Test fee_rate values that cannot be represented in sat/vB.
         for invalid_value in [0.0001, 0.00000001, 0.00099999, 31.99999999, "0.0001", "0.00000001", "0.00099999", "31.99999999"]:
-            assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, msg, rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, {"fee_rate": invalid_value})
+            assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, msg, rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, fee_rate=invalid_value)
         # Test fee_rate out of range (negative number).
-        assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, "Amount out of range", rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, {"fee_rate": -1})
+        assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, "Amount out of range", rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, fee_rate=-1)
         # Test type error.
         for value in [{"foo": "bar"}, True]:
-            assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, "Amount is not a number or string", rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, {"fee_rate": value})
+            assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, "Amount is not a number or string", rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, fee_rate=value)
 
         self.log.info("Test explicit fee rate raises RPC error if both fee_rate and conf_target are passed")
         assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Cannot specify both conf_target and fee_rate. Please provide either a confirmation "
             "target in blocks for automatic fee estimation, or an explicit fee rate.",
-            rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, {"conf_target": NORMAL, "fee_rate": NORMAL})
+            rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, conf_target=NORMAL, fee_rate=NORMAL)
 
         self.log.info("Test explicit fee rate raises RPC error if both fee_rate and estimate_mode are passed")
         assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Cannot specify both estimate_mode and fee_rate",
-            rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, {"estimate_mode": "economical", "fee_rate": NORMAL})
+            rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, estimate_mode="economical", fee_rate=NORMAL)
 
         self.log.info("Test invalid conf_target settings")
         assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "confTarget and conf_target options should not both be set",
@@ -161,10 +161,10 @@ class BumpFeeTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
         self.log.info("Test invalid estimate_mode settings")
         for k, v in {"number": 42, "object": {"foo": "bar"}}.items():
             assert_raises_rpc_error(-3, f"JSON value of type {k} for field estimate_mode is not of expected type string",
-                rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, {"estimate_mode": v})
+                rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, estimate_mode=v)
         for mode in ["foo", Decimal("3.1415"), "sat/B", "BTC/kB"]:
             assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, 'Invalid estimate_mode parameter, must be one of: "unset", "economical", "conservative"',
-                rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, {"estimate_mode": mode})
+                rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, estimate_mode=mode)
 
         self.log.info("Test invalid outputs values")
         assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, output argument cannot be an empty array",
@@ -232,12 +232,12 @@ def test_simple_bumpfee_succeeds(self, mode, rbf_node, peer_node, dest_address):
     self.sync_mempools((rbf_node, peer_node))
     assert rbfid in rbf_node.getrawmempool() and rbfid in peer_node.getrawmempool()
     if mode == "fee_rate":
-        bumped_psbt = rbf_node.psbtbumpfee(rbfid, {"fee_rate": str(NORMAL)})
-        bumped_tx = rbf_node.bumpfee(rbfid, {"fee_rate": NORMAL})
+        bumped_psbt = rbf_node.psbtbumpfee(rbfid, fee_rate=str(NORMAL))
+        bumped_tx = rbf_node.bumpfee(rbfid, fee_rate=NORMAL)
     elif mode == "new_outputs":
         new_address = peer_node.getnewaddress()
-        bumped_psbt = rbf_node.psbtbumpfee(rbfid, {"outputs": {new_address: 0.0003}})
-        bumped_tx = rbf_node.bumpfee(rbfid, {"outputs": {new_address: 0.0003}})
+        bumped_psbt = rbf_node.psbtbumpfee(rbfid, outputs={new_address: 0.0003})
+        bumped_tx = rbf_node.bumpfee(rbfid, outputs={new_address: 0.0003})
     else:
         bumped_psbt = rbf_node.psbtbumpfee(rbfid)
         bumped_tx = rbf_node.bumpfee(rbfid)
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ def test_notmine_bumpfee(self, rbf_node, peer_node, dest_address):
     # Note that this test depends upon the RPC code checking input ownership prior to change outputs
     # (since it can't use fundrawtransaction, it lacks a proper change output)
     fee = Decimal("0.001")
-    utxos = [node.listunspent(query_options={'minimumAmount': fee})[-1] for node in (rbf_node, peer_node)]
+    utxos = [node.listunspent(minimumAmount=fee)[-1] for node in (rbf_node, peer_node)]
     inputs = [{
         "txid": utxo["txid"],
         "vout": utxo["vout"],
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ def test_notmine_bumpfee(self, rbf_node, peer_node, dest_address):
     psbt = rbf_node.psbtbumpfee(txid=rbfid)
     finish_psbtbumpfee(psbt["psbt"])
 
-    psbt = rbf_node.psbtbumpfee(txid=rbfid, options={"fee_rate": old_feerate + 10})
+    psbt = rbf_node.psbtbumpfee(txid=rbfid, fee_rate=old_feerate + 10)
     finish_psbtbumpfee(psbt["psbt"])
 
     self.clear_mempool()
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ def test_dust_to_fee(self, rbf_node, dest_address):
     # Expected fee is 141 vbytes * fee_rate 0.00350250 BTC / 1000 vbytes = 0.00049385 BTC.
     # or occasionally 140 vbytes * fee_rate 0.00350250 BTC / 1000 vbytes = 0.00049035 BTC.
     # Dust should be dropped to the fee, so actual bump fee is 0.00050000 BTC.
-    bumped_tx = rbf_node.bumpfee(rbfid, {"fee_rate": 350.25})
+    bumped_tx = rbf_node.bumpfee(rbfid, fee_rate=350.25)
     full_bumped_tx = rbf_node.getrawtransaction(bumped_tx["txid"], 1)
     assert_equal(bumped_tx["fee"], Decimal("0.00050000"))
     assert_equal(len(fulltx["vout"]), 2)
@@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ def test_watchonly_psbt(self, peer_node, rbf_node, dest_address):
     assert_raises_rpc_error(-4, "bumpfee is not available with wallets that have private keys disabled. Use psbtbumpfee instead.", watcher.bumpfee, original_txid)
 
     # Bump fee, obnoxiously high to add additional watchonly input
-    bumped_psbt = watcher.psbtbumpfee(original_txid, {"fee_rate": HIGH})
+    bumped_psbt = watcher.psbtbumpfee(original_txid, fee_rate=HIGH)
     assert_greater_than(len(watcher.decodepsbt(bumped_psbt['psbt'])["tx"]["vin"]), 1)
     assert "txid" not in bumped_psbt
     assert_equal(bumped_psbt["origfee"], -watcher.gettransaction(original_txid)["fee"])
@@ -593,17 +593,17 @@ def test_watchonly_psbt(self, peer_node, rbf_node, dest_address):
 def test_rebumping(self, rbf_node, dest_address):
     self.log.info('Test that re-bumping the original tx fails, but bumping successor works')
     rbfid = spend_one_input(rbf_node, dest_address)
-    bumped = rbf_node.bumpfee(rbfid, {"fee_rate": ECONOMICAL})
+    bumped = rbf_node.bumpfee(rbfid, fee_rate=ECONOMICAL)
     assert_raises_rpc_error(-4, f"Cannot bump transaction {rbfid} which was already bumped by transaction {bumped['txid']}",
-                            rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, {"fee_rate": NORMAL})
-    rbf_node.bumpfee(bumped["txid"], {"fee_rate": NORMAL})
+                            rbf_node.bumpfee, rbfid, fee_rate=NORMAL)
+    rbf_node.bumpfee(bumped["txid"], fee_rate=NORMAL)
     self.clear_mempool()
 
 
 def test_rebumping_not_replaceable(self, rbf_node, dest_address):
     self.log.info('Test that re-bumping non-replaceable fails')
     rbfid = spend_one_input(rbf_node, dest_address)
-    bumped = rbf_node.bumpfee(rbfid, {"fee_rate": ECONOMICAL, "replaceable": False})
+    bumped = rbf_node.bumpfee(rbfid, fee_rate=ECONOMICAL, replaceable=False)
     assert_raises_rpc_error(-4, "Transaction is not BIP 125 replaceable", rbf_node.bumpfee, bumped["txid"],
                             {"fee_rate": NORMAL})
     self.clear_mempool()
@@ -615,7 +615,7 @@ def test_bumpfee_already_spent(self, rbf_node, dest_address):
     self.generate(rbf_node, 1)  # spend coin simply by mining block with tx
     spent_input = rbf_node.gettransaction(txid=txid, verbose=True)['decoded']['vin'][0]
     assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, f"{spent_input['txid']}:{spent_input['vout']} is already spent",
-                            rbf_node.bumpfee, txid, {"fee_rate": NORMAL})
+                            rbf_node.bumpfee, txid, fee_rate=NORMAL)
 
 
 def test_unconfirmed_not_spendable(self, rbf_node, rbf_node_address):
@@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ def test_change_script_match(self, rbf_node, dest_address):
     assert_equal(len(change_addresses), 1)
 
     # Now find that address in each subsequent tx, and no other change
-    bumped_total_tx = rbf_node.bumpfee(rbfid, {"fee_rate": ECONOMICAL})
+    bumped_total_tx = rbf_node.bumpfee(rbfid, fee_rate=ECONOMICAL)
     assert_equal(change_addresses, get_change_address(bumped_total_tx['txid'], rbf_node))
     bumped_rate_tx = rbf_node.bumpfee(bumped_total_tx["txid"])
     assert_equal(change_addresses, get_change_address(bumped_rate_tx['txid'], rbf_node))