diff options
author | W. J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com> | 2021-05-19 11:23:38 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | W. J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com> | 2021-05-19 11:57:24 +0200 |
commit | 4da26fb85d6d6d205a2794ccb98beee1302b4a25 (patch) | |
tree | 8b8601b947853dc1313c16f78eca57eaefd6542c /src/test/netbase_tests.cpp | |
parent | 1ed859e90e18384376e3a1ff0cb76f3e9ab11c2d (diff) | |
parent | 7075f604e8d0b21b2255fa57e20cd365dc10a288 (diff) |
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21506: p2p, refactor: make NetPermissionFlags an enum class
7075f604e8d0b21b2255fa57e20cd365dc10a288 scripted-diff: update noban documentation in net_processing.cpp (Jon Atack)
a95540cf435029f06e56749802d71315ca76b0dd scripted-diff: rename NetPermissionFlags enumerators (Jon Atack)
810d0929c1626bba141af3f779a3c9cd6ece7e75 p2p, refactor: make NetPermissionFlags a uint32 enum class (Jon Atack)
7b55a9449778c5ac89799ce4c607c8c8d797ddfb p2p: NetPermissions::HasFlag() pass flags param by value (Jon Atack)
91f6e6e6d1720e1154ad3f70a5098e9028efa84a scripted-diff: add NetPermissionFlags scopes where not already present (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
While reviewing #20196, I noticed the `NetPermissionFlags` enums are frequently called as if they were scoped, yet are still global. This patch upgrades `NetPermissionFlags` to a scoped class enum and updates the enumerator naming, similarly to #19771. See https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#enum-enumerations for more info.
This change would eliminate the class of bugs like https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20196#discussion_r610770148 and #21644, as only defined operations on the flags would compile.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 7075f604e8d0b21b2255fa57e20cd365dc10a288
vasild:
ACK 7075f604e8d0b21b2255fa57e20cd365dc10a288
Tree-SHA512: 7fcea66ee499f059efc78c934b5f729b3c8573fe304dee2c27c837c2f662b89324790568246d75b2a574cf9f059b42d3551d928996862f4358055eb43521e6f4
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/netbase_tests.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/netbase_tests.cpp | 52 |
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 26 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/netbase_tests.cpp b/src/test/netbase_tests.cpp index b316a37c6e..3c47cf83e2 100644 --- a/src/test/netbase_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/netbase_tests.cpp @@ -381,27 +381,27 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(netpermissions_test) // If no permission flags, assume backward compatibility BOOST_CHECK(NetWhitebindPermissions::TryParse("1.2.3.4:32", whitebindPermissions, error)); BOOST_CHECK(error.empty()); - BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, PF_ISIMPLICIT); - BOOST_CHECK(NetPermissions::HasFlag(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, PF_ISIMPLICIT)); - NetPermissions::ClearFlag(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, PF_ISIMPLICIT); - BOOST_CHECK(!NetPermissions::HasFlag(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, PF_ISIMPLICIT)); - BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, PF_NONE); - NetPermissions::AddFlag(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, PF_ISIMPLICIT); - BOOST_CHECK(NetPermissions::HasFlag(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, PF_ISIMPLICIT)); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::Implicit); + BOOST_CHECK(NetPermissions::HasFlag(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::Implicit)); + NetPermissions::ClearFlag(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::Implicit); + BOOST_CHECK(!NetPermissions::HasFlag(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::Implicit)); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::None); + NetPermissions::AddFlag(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::Implicit); + BOOST_CHECK(NetPermissions::HasFlag(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::Implicit)); // Can set one permission BOOST_CHECK(NetWhitebindPermissions::TryParse("bloom@1.2.3.4:32", whitebindPermissions, error)); - BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, PF_BLOOMFILTER); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::BloomFilter); BOOST_CHECK(NetWhitebindPermissions::TryParse("@1.2.3.4:32", whitebindPermissions, error)); - BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, PF_NONE); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::None); NetWhitebindPermissions noban, noban_download, download_noban, download; // "noban" implies "download" BOOST_REQUIRE(NetWhitebindPermissions::TryParse("noban@1.2.3.4:32", noban, error)); - BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(noban.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::PF_NOBAN); - BOOST_CHECK(NetPermissions::HasFlag(noban.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::PF_DOWNLOAD)); - BOOST_CHECK(NetPermissions::HasFlag(noban.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::PF_NOBAN)); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(noban.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::NoBan); + BOOST_CHECK(NetPermissions::HasFlag(noban.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::Download)); + BOOST_CHECK(NetPermissions::HasFlag(noban.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::NoBan)); // "noban,download" is equivalent to "noban" BOOST_REQUIRE(NetWhitebindPermissions::TryParse("noban,download@1.2.3.4:32", noban_download, error)); @@ -413,31 +413,31 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(netpermissions_test) // "download" excludes (does not imply) "noban" BOOST_REQUIRE(NetWhitebindPermissions::TryParse("download@1.2.3.4:32", download, error)); - BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(download.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::PF_DOWNLOAD); - BOOST_CHECK(NetPermissions::HasFlag(download.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::PF_DOWNLOAD)); - BOOST_CHECK(!NetPermissions::HasFlag(download.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::PF_NOBAN)); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(download.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::Download); + BOOST_CHECK(NetPermissions::HasFlag(download.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::Download)); + BOOST_CHECK(!NetPermissions::HasFlag(download.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::NoBan)); // Happy path, can parse flags BOOST_CHECK(NetWhitebindPermissions::TryParse("bloom,forcerelay@1.2.3.4:32", whitebindPermissions, error)); // forcerelay should also activate the relay permission - BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, PF_BLOOMFILTER | PF_FORCERELAY | PF_RELAY); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::BloomFilter | NetPermissionFlags::ForceRelay | NetPermissionFlags::Relay); BOOST_CHECK(NetWhitebindPermissions::TryParse("bloom,relay,noban@1.2.3.4:32", whitebindPermissions, error)); - BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, PF_BLOOMFILTER | PF_RELAY | PF_NOBAN); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::BloomFilter | NetPermissionFlags::Relay | NetPermissionFlags::NoBan); BOOST_CHECK(NetWhitebindPermissions::TryParse("bloom,forcerelay,noban@1.2.3.4:32", whitebindPermissions, error)); BOOST_CHECK(NetWhitebindPermissions::TryParse("all@1.2.3.4:32", whitebindPermissions, error)); - BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, PF_ALL); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::All); // Allow dups BOOST_CHECK(NetWhitebindPermissions::TryParse("bloom,relay,noban,noban@1.2.3.4:32", whitebindPermissions, error)); - BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, PF_BLOOMFILTER | PF_RELAY | PF_NOBAN | PF_DOWNLOAD); // "noban" implies "download" + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::BloomFilter | NetPermissionFlags::Relay | NetPermissionFlags::NoBan | NetPermissionFlags::Download); // "noban" implies "download" // Allow empty BOOST_CHECK(NetWhitebindPermissions::TryParse("bloom,relay,,noban@1.2.3.4:32", whitebindPermissions, error)); - BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, PF_BLOOMFILTER | PF_RELAY | PF_NOBAN); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::BloomFilter | NetPermissionFlags::Relay | NetPermissionFlags::NoBan); BOOST_CHECK(NetWhitebindPermissions::TryParse(",@1.2.3.4:32", whitebindPermissions, error)); - BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, PF_NONE); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::None); BOOST_CHECK(NetWhitebindPermissions::TryParse(",,@1.2.3.4:32", whitebindPermissions, error)); - BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, PF_NONE); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitebindPermissions.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::None); // Detect invalid flag BOOST_CHECK(!NetWhitebindPermissions::TryParse("bloom,forcerelay,oopsie@1.2.3.4:32", whitebindPermissions, error)); @@ -449,16 +449,16 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(netpermissions_test) // Happy path for whitelist parsing BOOST_CHECK(NetWhitelistPermissions::TryParse("noban@1.2.3.4", whitelistPermissions, error)); - BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitelistPermissions.m_flags, PF_NOBAN); - BOOST_CHECK(NetPermissions::HasFlag(whitelistPermissions.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::PF_NOBAN)); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitelistPermissions.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::NoBan); + BOOST_CHECK(NetPermissions::HasFlag(whitelistPermissions.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::NoBan)); BOOST_CHECK(NetWhitelistPermissions::TryParse("bloom,forcerelay,noban,relay@1.2.3.4/32", whitelistPermissions, error)); - BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitelistPermissions.m_flags, PF_BLOOMFILTER | PF_FORCERELAY | PF_NOBAN | PF_RELAY); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitelistPermissions.m_flags, NetPermissionFlags::BloomFilter | NetPermissionFlags::ForceRelay | NetPermissionFlags::NoBan | NetPermissionFlags::Relay); BOOST_CHECK(error.empty()); BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(whitelistPermissions.m_subnet.ToString(), "1.2.3.4/32"); BOOST_CHECK(NetWhitelistPermissions::TryParse("bloom,forcerelay,noban,relay,mempool@1.2.3.4/32", whitelistPermissions, error)); - const auto strings = NetPermissions::ToStrings(PF_ALL); + const auto strings = NetPermissions::ToStrings(NetPermissionFlags::All); BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(strings.size(), 7U); BOOST_CHECK(std::find(strings.begin(), strings.end(), "bloomfilter") != strings.end()); BOOST_CHECK(std::find(strings.begin(), strings.end(), "forcerelay") != strings.end()); |