diff options
| author | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com> | 2020-10-02 16:36:57 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com> | 2020-10-02 16:42:38 +0200 |
| commit | 597488d37c9c358837616516d88f861f5c25f827 (patch) | |
| tree | 8200b3675c5ffde1607e860a984e579b855fd8cb /src/signet.cpp | |
| parent | df2129a2349b1877049f250551f49a4592e73765 (diff) | |
| parent | d76925478efd35e6fd835370639f2139b28381e4 (diff) | |
Merge #19871: doc: Clarify scope of eviction protection of outbound block-relay peers
d76925478efd35e6fd835370639f2139b28381e4 [doc] Clarify semantic of peer's m_protect w.r.t to outbound eviction logics (Antoine Riard)
ac71fe936da290adf5a3155fe8db5f78b485f1f1 [doc] Clarify scope of eviction protection of outbound block-relay peers (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
Block-relay-only peers were introduced by #15759. According to its
author, it was intented to make them only immune to outbound peer
rotation-based eviction and not from all eviction as modified comment
leans to think of.
Clearly indicate that outbound block-relay peers aren't protected
from eviction by the bad/lagging chain logic.
Fix #19863
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK d76925478efd35e6fd835370639f2139b28381e4
jonatack:
ACK d76925478efd35e6fd835370639f2139b28381e4
Tree-SHA512: 597fbd62838a6e39276024165b11514cad20a2e9d33cf9202d261cbadcb62b2df427c858e0cb57e585840d4c1d4600104aa53916bb868541f2580e4eed9b4b52
Diffstat (limited to 'src/signet.cpp')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions