diff options
| author | MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com> | 2020-08-27 20:17:22 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com> | 2020-08-27 20:17:25 +0200 |
| commit | b987e657cda982a65c181e378ab9a9f3ca765b49 (patch) | |
| tree | a4268e1ee6de5e6cd84bae0698aadaa7e5e650a2 /src/qt/forms | |
| parent | 91af7ef831d32a9db7719c64442a7d76cef5a931 (diff) | |
| parent | a99a3c0bd6d5476503c015e23be569295fdd190c (diff) | |
| download | bitcoin-b987e657cda982a65c181e378ab9a9f3ca765b49.tar.xz | |
Merge #19169: rpc: Validate provided keys for query_options parameter in listunspent
a99a3c0bd6d5476503c015e23be569295fdd190c rpc: Validate provided keys for query_options parameter in listunspent (pasta)
Pull request description:
At Dash, one of our developers was working with the `listunspent` RPC command, but instead of saying "minimumAmount" he said "minimmumAmount" as such the RPC wasn't working as expected.
In https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/3507 we implemented a check so that `listunspent` returns an error if an unrecognized option is given. I figured I might as well adapt the code and throw up a PR here.
Cheers!
ACKs for top commit:
adaminsky:
ACK `a99a3c0bd`
meshcollider:
Seems fine to me. utACK a99a3c0bd6d5476503c015e23be569295fdd190c
Tree-SHA512: 9fccf14979849879a51b352afa3e1932ce4a6cfc2ee97b8d405ec6e65673fe94e302795e3ec0b440e6d252f13acda620e1f6a0e86c3fa918883c3fb4600a372c
Diffstat (limited to 'src/qt/forms')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions