aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/policy/v3_policy.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorglozow <gloriajzhao@gmail.com>2024-02-14 14:15:48 +0000
committerglozow <gloriajzhao@gmail.com>2024-03-01 15:23:03 +0000
commit170306728aa23a4d5fcc383ddabd97f66fed5119 (patch)
tree903bf399eff5210c46623843661f0a7a2b75b216 /src/policy/v3_policy.cpp
parentb5d15f764fed0b30c9113429163700dea907c2b1 (diff)
downloadbitcoin-170306728aa23a4d5fcc383ddabd97f66fed5119.tar.xz
[policy] sibling eviction for v3 transactions
Diffstat (limited to 'src/policy/v3_policy.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/policy/v3_policy.cpp21
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/src/policy/v3_policy.cpp b/src/policy/v3_policy.cpp
index c98262c364..3c3942d707 100644
--- a/src/policy/v3_policy.cpp
+++ b/src/policy/v3_policy.cpp
@@ -130,10 +130,11 @@ std::optional<std::string> PackageV3Checks(const CTransactionRef& ptx, int64_t v
}
// It shouldn't be possible to have any mempool siblings at this point. SingleV3Checks
- // catches mempool siblings. Also, if the package consists of connected transactions,
+ // catches mempool siblings and sibling eviction is not extended to packages. Also, if the package consists of connected transactions,
// any tx having a mempool ancestor would mean the package exceeds ancestor limits.
if (!Assume(!parent_info.m_has_mempool_descendant)) {
- return strprintf("tx %u would exceed descendant count limit", parent_info.m_wtxid.ToString());
+ return strprintf("tx %s (wtxid=%s) would exceed descendant count limit",
+ parent_info.m_txid.ToString(), parent_info.m_wtxid.ToString());
}
}
} else {
@@ -214,10 +215,20 @@ std::optional<std::pair<std::string, CTransactionRef>> SingleV3Checks(const CTra
std::any_of(children.cbegin(), children.cend(),
[&direct_conflicts](const CTxMemPoolEntry& child){return direct_conflicts.count(child.GetTx().GetHash()) > 0;});
if (parent_entry->GetCountWithDescendants() + 1 > V3_DESCENDANT_LIMIT && !child_will_be_replaced) {
+ // Allow sibling eviction for v3 transaction: if another child already exists, even if
+ // we don't conflict inputs with it, consider evicting it under RBF rules. We rely on v3 rules
+ // only permitting 1 descendant, as otherwise we would need to have logic for deciding
+ // which descendant to evict. Skip if this isn't true, e.g. if the transaction has
+ // multiple children or the sibling also has descendants due to a reorg.
+ const bool consider_sibling_eviction{parent_entry->GetCountWithDescendants() == 2 &&
+ children.begin()->get().GetCountWithAncestors() == 2};
+
+ // Return the sibling if its eviction can be considered. Provide the "descendant count
+ // limit" string either way, as the caller may decide not to do sibling eviction.
return std::make_pair(strprintf("tx %u (wtxid=%s) would exceed descendant count limit",
- parent_entry->GetSharedTx()->GetHash().ToString(),
- parent_entry->GetSharedTx()->GetWitnessHash().ToString()),
- nullptr);
+ parent_entry->GetSharedTx()->GetHash().ToString(),
+ parent_entry->GetSharedTx()->GetWitnessHash().ToString()),
+ consider_sibling_eviction ? children.begin()->get().GetSharedTx() : nullptr);
}
}
return std::nullopt;