diff options
author | MacroFake <falke.marco@gmail.com> | 2022-07-13 17:20:57 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | MacroFake <falke.marco@gmail.com> | 2022-07-13 17:21:01 +0200 |
commit | 31c6309cc60ae3fee2d3ecc2aff9576596fb98ac (patch) | |
tree | 9384a07a016d5c90ee75b2b97a6d062c19e1842d /src/net.cpp | |
parent | c30b3e90f00b65d16e9abb8d4430e46ca1d2e4d4 (diff) | |
parent | faace13b712a349863eaf7c469069db17b6e9dd5 (diff) | |
download | bitcoin-31c6309cc60ae3fee2d3ecc2aff9576596fb98ac.tar.xz |
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25596: scripted-diff: [test] Rename BIP125_SEQUENCE_NUMBER to MAX_BIP125_RBF_SEQUENCE
faace13b712a349863eaf7c469069db17b6e9dd5 test: Remove duplicate MAX_BIP125_RBF_SEQUENCE constant (MacroFake)
fa0404dbb76abd7ebf7c14bd80ce7c6297e20466 scripted-diff: [test] Rename BIP125_SEQUENCE_NUMBER to MAX_BIP125_RBF_SEQUENCE (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Not sure why the python constant is named differently than the constant in the C++ source code.
Especially, if we use this in context of MAX+1 (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25575#discussion_r918569813) the rename makes sense, in my eyes.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Code-review ACK faace13b712a349863eaf7c469069db17b6e9dd5
glozow:
concept ACK faace13b712a349863eaf7c469069db17b6e9dd5
Tree-SHA512: 1dc8cd0f067717f6ace8121b660e99f2d0f8c485c0d61b80413e07e7830e7dfaf9ce2c922c63ba2c6b42e805d59d88cd0d9c80a4b4a2fca47e77a3aba6cd4ec6
Diffstat (limited to 'src/net.cpp')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions