diff options
author | fanquake <fanquake@gmail.com> | 2021-11-12 09:25:40 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | fanquake <fanquake@gmail.com> | 2021-11-12 10:00:49 +0800 |
commit | c1fb30633b6dcbf32db7d53c9f538019af80d6c5 (patch) | |
tree | 0fb479ab0aa27218dc34db18cd3a31ac72b1359a /src/minisketch/build-aux/m4/ax_cxx_compile_stdcxx.m4 | |
parent | bc03823e26d1bf0cca679ce9330f9c6a58b33faf (diff) | |
parent | 29173d6c6ca0cc3be9fa6bf2409a509ffea1a02a (diff) | |
download | bitcoin-c1fb30633b6dcbf32db7d53c9f538019af80d6c5.tar.xz |
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23114: Add minisketch subtree and integrate into build/test
29173d6c6ca0cc3be9fa6bf2409a509ffea1a02a ubsan: add minisketch exceptions (Cory Fields)
54b5e1aeab73953c1f12ec2c041572038f6f59da Add thin Minisketch wrapper to pick best implementation (Pieter Wuille)
ee9dc71c1bc16205494f2a0aebe575a3c062ff52 Add basic minisketch tests (Pieter Wuille)
0659f12b131fc5915fe7a493306af197f4fb838b Add minisketch dependency (Gleb Naumenko)
0eb7928ab8d9dcb840e4965bfa81deb752b00dfa Add MSVC build configuration for libminisketch (Pieter Wuille)
8bc166d5b179205fc56855e2b462aa273a6f8661 build: add minisketch build file and include it (Cory Fields)
b2904ceb85b4d440b1f4bbd716fcb601411cc2c9 build: add configure checks for minisketch (Cory Fields)
b6487dc4ef47ec9ea894eceac25f37d0b806f8aa Squashed 'src/minisketch/' content from commit 89629eb2c7 (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This takes over #21859, which has [recently switched](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21859#issuecomment-921899200) to my integration branch. A few more build issues came up (and have been fixed) since, and after discussing with sipa it was decided I would open a PR to shepherd any final changes through.
> This adds a `src/minisketch` subtree, taken from the master branch of https://github.com/sipa/minisketch, to prepare for Erlay implementation (see #21515). It gets configured for just supporting 32-bit fields (the only ones we're interested in in the context of Erlay), and some code on top is added:
> * A very basic unit test (just to make sure compilation & running works; actual correctness checking is done through minisketch's own tests).
> * A wrapper in `minisketchwrapper.{cpp,h}` that runs a benchmark to determine which field implementation to use.
Only changes since my last update to the branch in the previous PR have been rebasing on master and fixing an issue with a header in an introduced file.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK 29173d6c6ca0cc3be9fa6bf2409a509ffea1a02a
Tree-SHA512: 1217d3228db1dd0de12c2919314e1c3626c18a416cf6291fec99d37e34fb6eec8e28d9e9fb935f8590273b8836cbadac313a15f05b4fd9f9d3024c8ce2c80d02
Diffstat (limited to 'src/minisketch/build-aux/m4/ax_cxx_compile_stdcxx.m4')
-rw-r--r-- | src/minisketch/build-aux/m4/ax_cxx_compile_stdcxx.m4 | 962 |
1 files changed, 962 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/minisketch/build-aux/m4/ax_cxx_compile_stdcxx.m4 b/src/minisketch/build-aux/m4/ax_cxx_compile_stdcxx.m4 new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..f7e5137003 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/minisketch/build-aux/m4/ax_cxx_compile_stdcxx.m4 @@ -0,0 +1,962 @@ +# =========================================================================== +# https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf-archive/ax_cxx_compile_stdcxx.html +# =========================================================================== +# +# SYNOPSIS +# +# AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX(VERSION, [ext|noext], [mandatory|optional]) +# +# DESCRIPTION +# +# Check for baseline language coverage in the compiler for the specified +# version of the C++ standard. If necessary, add switches to CXX and +# CXXCPP to enable support. VERSION may be '11' (for the C++11 standard) +# or '14' (for the C++14 standard). +# +# The second argument, if specified, indicates whether you insist on an +# extended mode (e.g. -std=gnu++11) or a strict conformance mode (e.g. +# -std=c++11). If neither is specified, you get whatever works, with +# preference for no added switch, and then for an extended mode. +# +# The third argument, if specified 'mandatory' or if left unspecified, +# indicates that baseline support for the specified C++ standard is +# required and that the macro should error out if no mode with that +# support is found. If specified 'optional', then configuration proceeds +# regardless, after defining HAVE_CXX${VERSION} if and only if a +# supporting mode is found. +# +# LICENSE +# +# Copyright (c) 2008 Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> +# Copyright (c) 2012 Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com> +# Copyright (c) 2013 Roy Stogner <roystgnr@ices.utexas.edu> +# Copyright (c) 2014, 2015 Google Inc.; contributed by Alexey Sokolov <sokolov@google.com> +# Copyright (c) 2015 Paul Norman <penorman@mac.com> +# Copyright (c) 2015 Moritz Klammler <moritz@klammler.eu> +# Copyright (c) 2016, 2018 Krzesimir Nowak <qdlacz@gmail.com> +# Copyright (c) 2019 Enji Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> +# Copyright (c) 2020 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> +# +# Copying and distribution of this file, with or without modification, are +# permitted in any medium without royalty provided the copyright notice +# and this notice are preserved. This file is offered as-is, without any +# warranty. + +#serial 12 + +dnl This macro is based on the code from the AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_11 macro +dnl (serial version number 13). + +AC_DEFUN([AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX], [dnl + m4_if([$1], [11], [ax_cxx_compile_alternatives="11 0x"], + [$1], [14], [ax_cxx_compile_alternatives="14 1y"], + [$1], [17], [ax_cxx_compile_alternatives="17 1z"], + [m4_fatal([invalid first argument `$1' to AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX])])dnl + m4_if([$2], [], [], + [$2], [ext], [], + [$2], [noext], [], + [m4_fatal([invalid second argument `$2' to AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX])])dnl + m4_if([$3], [], [ax_cxx_compile_cxx$1_required=true], + [$3], [mandatory], [ax_cxx_compile_cxx$1_required=true], + [$3], [optional], [ax_cxx_compile_cxx$1_required=false], + [m4_fatal([invalid third argument `$3' to AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX])]) + AC_LANG_PUSH([C++])dnl + ac_success=no + + m4_if([$2], [], [dnl + AC_CACHE_CHECK(whether $CXX supports C++$1 features by default, + ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx$1, + [AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_$1])], + [ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx$1=yes], + [ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx$1=no])]) + if test x$ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx$1 = xyes; then + ac_success=yes + fi]) + + m4_if([$2], [noext], [], [dnl + if test x$ac_success = xno; then + for alternative in ${ax_cxx_compile_alternatives}; do + switch="-std=gnu++${alternative}" + cachevar=AS_TR_SH([ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx$1_$switch]) + AC_CACHE_CHECK(whether $CXX supports C++$1 features with $switch, + $cachevar, + [ac_save_CXX="$CXX" + CXX="$CXX $switch" + AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_$1])], + [eval $cachevar=yes], + [eval $cachevar=no]) + CXX="$ac_save_CXX"]) + if eval test x\$$cachevar = xyes; then + CXX="$CXX $switch" + if test -n "$CXXCPP" ; then + CXXCPP="$CXXCPP $switch" + fi + ac_success=yes + break + fi + done + fi]) + + m4_if([$2], [ext], [], [dnl + if test x$ac_success = xno; then + dnl HP's aCC needs +std=c++11 according to: + dnl http://h21007.www2.hp.com/portal/download/files/unprot/aCxx/PDF_Release_Notes/769149-001.pdf + dnl Cray's crayCC needs "-h std=c++11" + for alternative in ${ax_cxx_compile_alternatives}; do + for switch in -std=c++${alternative} +std=c++${alternative} "-h std=c++${alternative}"; do + cachevar=AS_TR_SH([ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx$1_$switch]) + AC_CACHE_CHECK(whether $CXX supports C++$1 features with $switch, + $cachevar, + [ac_save_CXX="$CXX" + CXX="$CXX $switch" + AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_$1])], + [eval $cachevar=yes], + [eval $cachevar=no]) + CXX="$ac_save_CXX"]) + if eval test x\$$cachevar = xyes; then + CXX="$CXX $switch" + if test -n "$CXXCPP" ; then + CXXCPP="$CXXCPP $switch" + fi + ac_success=yes + break + fi + done + if test x$ac_success = xyes; then + break + fi + done + fi]) + AC_LANG_POP([C++]) + if test x$ax_cxx_compile_cxx$1_required = xtrue; then + if test x$ac_success = xno; then + AC_MSG_ERROR([*** A compiler with support for C++$1 language features is required.]) + fi + fi + if test x$ac_success = xno; then + HAVE_CXX$1=0 + AC_MSG_NOTICE([No compiler with C++$1 support was found]) + else + HAVE_CXX$1=1 + AC_DEFINE(HAVE_CXX$1,1, + [define if the compiler supports basic C++$1 syntax]) + fi + AC_SUBST(HAVE_CXX$1) +]) + + +dnl Test body for checking C++11 support + +m4_define([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_11], + _AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_11 +) + + +dnl Test body for checking C++14 support + +m4_define([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_14], + _AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_11 + _AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_14 +) + +m4_define([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_17], + _AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_11 + _AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_14 + _AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_17 +) + +dnl Tests for new features in C++11 + +m4_define([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_11], [[ + +// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++11, why torture it? +// Hopefully, this will speed up the test. + +#ifndef __cplusplus + +#error "This is not a C++ compiler" + +#elif __cplusplus < 201103L + +#error "This is not a C++11 compiler" + +#else + +namespace cxx11 +{ + + namespace test_static_assert + { + + template <typename T> + struct check + { + static_assert(sizeof(int) <= sizeof(T), "not big enough"); + }; + + } + + namespace test_final_override + { + + struct Base + { + virtual ~Base() {} + virtual void f() {} + }; + + struct Derived : public Base + { + virtual ~Derived() override {} + virtual void f() override {} + }; + + } + + namespace test_double_right_angle_brackets + { + + template < typename T > + struct check {}; + + typedef check<void> single_type; + typedef check<check<void>> double_type; + typedef check<check<check<void>>> triple_type; + typedef check<check<check<check<void>>>> quadruple_type; + + } + + namespace test_decltype + { + + int + f() + { + int a = 1; + decltype(a) b = 2; + return a + b; + } + + } + + namespace test_type_deduction + { + + template < typename T1, typename T2 > + struct is_same + { + static const bool value = false; + }; + + template < typename T > + struct is_same<T, T> + { + static const bool value = true; + }; + + template < typename T1, typename T2 > + auto + add(T1 a1, T2 a2) -> decltype(a1 + a2) + { + return a1 + a2; + } + + int + test(const int c, volatile int v) + { + static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(0)>::value == true, ""); + static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(c)>::value == false, ""); + static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(v)>::value == false, ""); + auto ac = c; + auto av = v; + auto sumi = ac + av + 'x'; + auto sumf = ac + av + 1.0; + static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(ac)>::value == true, ""); + static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(av)>::value == true, ""); + static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(sumi)>::value == true, ""); + static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(sumf)>::value == false, ""); + static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(add(c, v))>::value == true, ""); + return (sumf > 0.0) ? sumi : add(c, v); + } + + } + + namespace test_noexcept + { + + int f() { return 0; } + int g() noexcept { return 0; } + + static_assert(noexcept(f()) == false, ""); + static_assert(noexcept(g()) == true, ""); + + } + + namespace test_constexpr + { + + template < typename CharT > + unsigned long constexpr + strlen_c_r(const CharT *const s, const unsigned long acc) noexcept + { + return *s ? strlen_c_r(s + 1, acc + 1) : acc; + } + + template < typename CharT > + unsigned long constexpr + strlen_c(const CharT *const s) noexcept + { + return strlen_c_r(s, 0UL); + } + + static_assert(strlen_c("") == 0UL, ""); + static_assert(strlen_c("1") == 1UL, ""); + static_assert(strlen_c("example") == 7UL, ""); + static_assert(strlen_c("another\0example") == 7UL, ""); + + } + + namespace test_rvalue_references + { + + template < int N > + struct answer + { + static constexpr int value = N; + }; + + answer<1> f(int&) { return answer<1>(); } + answer<2> f(const int&) { return answer<2>(); } + answer<3> f(int&&) { return answer<3>(); } + + void + test() + { + int i = 0; + const int c = 0; + static_assert(decltype(f(i))::value == 1, ""); + static_assert(decltype(f(c))::value == 2, ""); + static_assert(decltype(f(0))::value == 3, ""); + } + + } + + namespace test_uniform_initialization + { + + struct test + { + static const int zero {}; + static const int one {1}; + }; + + static_assert(test::zero == 0, ""); + static_assert(test::one == 1, ""); + + } + + namespace test_lambdas + { + + void + test1() + { + auto lambda1 = [](){}; + auto lambda2 = lambda1; + lambda1(); + lambda2(); + } + + int + test2() + { + auto a = [](int i, int j){ return i + j; }(1, 2); + auto b = []() -> int { return '0'; }(); + auto c = [=](){ return a + b; }(); + auto d = [&](){ return c; }(); + auto e = [a, &b](int x) mutable { + const auto identity = [](int y){ return y; }; + for (auto i = 0; i < a; ++i) + a += b--; + return x + identity(a + b); + }(0); + return a + b + c + d + e; + } + + int + test3() + { + const auto nullary = [](){ return 0; }; + const auto unary = [](int x){ return x; }; + using nullary_t = decltype(nullary); + using unary_t = decltype(unary); + const auto higher1st = [](nullary_t f){ return f(); }; + const auto higher2nd = [unary](nullary_t f1){ + return [unary, f1](unary_t f2){ return f2(unary(f1())); }; + }; + return higher1st(nullary) + higher2nd(nullary)(unary); + } + + } + + namespace test_variadic_templates + { + + template <int...> + struct sum; + + template <int N0, int... N1toN> + struct sum<N0, N1toN...> + { + static constexpr auto value = N0 + sum<N1toN...>::value; + }; + + template <> + struct sum<> + { + static constexpr auto value = 0; + }; + + static_assert(sum<>::value == 0, ""); + static_assert(sum<1>::value == 1, ""); + static_assert(sum<23>::value == 23, ""); + static_assert(sum<1, 2>::value == 3, ""); + static_assert(sum<5, 5, 11>::value == 21, ""); + static_assert(sum<2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13>::value == 41, ""); + + } + + // http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13728184/template-aliases-and-sfinae + // Clang 3.1 fails with headers of libstd++ 4.8.3 when using std::function + // because of this. + namespace test_template_alias_sfinae + { + + struct foo {}; + + template<typename T> + using member = typename T::member_type; + + template<typename T> + void func(...) {} + + template<typename T> + void func(member<T>*) {} + + void test(); + + void test() { func<foo>(0); } + + } + +} // namespace cxx11 + +#endif // __cplusplus >= 201103L + +]]) + + +dnl Tests for new features in C++14 + +m4_define([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_14], [[ + +// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++14, why torture it? +// Hopefully, this will speed up the test. + +#ifndef __cplusplus + +#error "This is not a C++ compiler" + +#elif __cplusplus < 201402L + +#error "This is not a C++14 compiler" + +#else + +namespace cxx14 +{ + + namespace test_polymorphic_lambdas + { + + int + test() + { + const auto lambda = [](auto&&... args){ + const auto istiny = [](auto x){ + return (sizeof(x) == 1UL) ? 1 : 0; + }; + const int aretiny[] = { istiny(args)... }; + return aretiny[0]; + }; + return lambda(1, 1L, 1.0f, '1'); + } + + } + + namespace test_binary_literals + { + + constexpr auto ivii = 0b0000000000101010; + static_assert(ivii == 42, "wrong value"); + + } + + namespace test_generalized_constexpr + { + + template < typename CharT > + constexpr unsigned long + strlen_c(const CharT *const s) noexcept + { + auto length = 0UL; + for (auto p = s; *p; ++p) + ++length; + return length; + } + + static_assert(strlen_c("") == 0UL, ""); + static_assert(strlen_c("x") == 1UL, ""); + static_assert(strlen_c("test") == 4UL, ""); + static_assert(strlen_c("another\0test") == 7UL, ""); + + } + + namespace test_lambda_init_capture + { + + int + test() + { + auto x = 0; + const auto lambda1 = [a = x](int b){ return a + b; }; + const auto lambda2 = [a = lambda1(x)](){ return a; }; + return lambda2(); + } + + } + + namespace test_digit_separators + { + + constexpr auto ten_million = 100'000'000; + static_assert(ten_million == 100000000, ""); + + } + + namespace test_return_type_deduction + { + + auto f(int& x) { return x; } + decltype(auto) g(int& x) { return x; } + + template < typename T1, typename T2 > + struct is_same + { + static constexpr auto value = false; + }; + + template < typename T > + struct is_same<T, T> + { + static constexpr auto value = true; + }; + + int + test() + { + auto x = 0; + static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(f(x))>::value, ""); + static_assert(is_same<int&, decltype(g(x))>::value, ""); + return x; + } + + } + +} // namespace cxx14 + +#endif // __cplusplus >= 201402L + +]]) + + +dnl Tests for new features in C++17 + +m4_define([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_17], [[ + +// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++17, why torture it? +// Hopefully, this will speed up the test. + +#ifndef __cplusplus + +#error "This is not a C++ compiler" + +#elif __cplusplus < 201703L + +#error "This is not a C++17 compiler" + +#else + +#include <initializer_list> +#include <utility> +#include <type_traits> + +namespace cxx17 +{ + + namespace test_constexpr_lambdas + { + + constexpr int foo = [](){return 42;}(); + + } + + namespace test::nested_namespace::definitions + { + + } + + namespace test_fold_expression + { + + template<typename... Args> + int multiply(Args... args) + { + return (args * ... * 1); + } + + template<typename... Args> + bool all(Args... args) + { + return (args && ...); + } + + } + + namespace test_extended_static_assert + { + + static_assert (true); + + } + + namespace test_auto_brace_init_list + { + + auto foo = {5}; + auto bar {5}; + + static_assert(std::is_same<std::initializer_list<int>, decltype(foo)>::value); + static_assert(std::is_same<int, decltype(bar)>::value); + } + + namespace test_typename_in_template_template_parameter + { + + template<template<typename> typename X> struct D; + + } + + namespace test_fallthrough_nodiscard_maybe_unused_attributes + { + + int f1() + { + return 42; + } + + [[nodiscard]] int f2() + { + [[maybe_unused]] auto unused = f1(); + + switch (f1()) + { + case 17: + f1(); + [[fallthrough]]; + case 42: + f1(); + } + return f1(); + } + + } + + namespace test_extended_aggregate_initialization + { + + struct base1 + { + int b1, b2 = 42; + }; + + struct base2 + { + base2() { + b3 = 42; + } + int b3; + }; + + struct derived : base1, base2 + { + int d; + }; + + derived d1 {{1, 2}, {}, 4}; // full initialization + derived d2 {{}, {}, 4}; // value-initialized bases + + } + + namespace test_general_range_based_for_loop + { + + struct iter + { + int i; + + int& operator* () + { + return i; + } + + const int& operator* () const + { + return i; + } + + iter& operator++() + { + ++i; + return *this; + } + }; + + struct sentinel + { + int i; + }; + + bool operator== (const iter& i, const sentinel& s) + { + return i.i == s.i; + } + + bool operator!= (const iter& i, const sentinel& s) + { + return !(i == s); + } + + struct range + { + iter begin() const + { + return {0}; + } + + sentinel end() const + { + return {5}; + } + }; + + void f() + { + range r {}; + + for (auto i : r) + { + [[maybe_unused]] auto v = i; + } + } + + } + + namespace test_lambda_capture_asterisk_this_by_value + { + + struct t + { + int i; + int foo() + { + return [*this]() + { + return i; + }(); + } + }; + + } + + namespace test_enum_class_construction + { + + enum class byte : unsigned char + {}; + + byte foo {42}; + + } + + namespace test_constexpr_if + { + + template <bool cond> + int f () + { + if constexpr(cond) + { + return 13; + } + else + { + return 42; + } + } + + } + + namespace test_selection_statement_with_initializer + { + + int f() + { + return 13; + } + + int f2() + { + if (auto i = f(); i > 0) + { + return 3; + } + + switch (auto i = f(); i + 4) + { + case 17: + return 2; + + default: + return 1; + } + } + + } + + namespace test_template_argument_deduction_for_class_templates + { + + template <typename T1, typename T2> + struct pair + { + pair (T1 p1, T2 p2) + : m1 {p1}, + m2 {p2} + {} + + T1 m1; + T2 m2; + }; + + void f() + { + [[maybe_unused]] auto p = pair{13, 42u}; + } + + } + + namespace test_non_type_auto_template_parameters + { + + template <auto n> + struct B + {}; + + B<5> b1; + B<'a'> b2; + + } + + namespace test_structured_bindings + { + + int arr[2] = { 1, 2 }; + std::pair<int, int> pr = { 1, 2 }; + + auto f1() -> int(&)[2] + { + return arr; + } + + auto f2() -> std::pair<int, int>& + { + return pr; + } + + struct S + { + int x1 : 2; + volatile double y1; + }; + + S f3() + { + return {}; + } + + auto [ x1, y1 ] = f1(); + auto& [ xr1, yr1 ] = f1(); + auto [ x2, y2 ] = f2(); + auto& [ xr2, yr2 ] = f2(); + const auto [ x3, y3 ] = f3(); + + } + + namespace test_exception_spec_type_system + { + + struct Good {}; + struct Bad {}; + + void g1() noexcept; + void g2(); + + template<typename T> + Bad + f(T*, T*); + + template<typename T1, typename T2> + Good + f(T1*, T2*); + + static_assert (std::is_same_v<Good, decltype(f(g1, g2))>); + + } + + namespace test_inline_variables + { + + template<class T> void f(T) + {} + + template<class T> inline T g(T) + { + return T{}; + } + + template<> inline void f<>(int) + {} + + template<> int g<>(int) + { + return 5; + } + + } + +} // namespace cxx17 + +#endif // __cplusplus < 201703L + +]]) |