aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/kernel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorglozow <gloriajzhao@gmail.com>2023-09-05 13:45:09 +0100
committerglozow <gloriajzhao@gmail.com>2023-09-13 13:01:59 +0100
commitcf5f1faa037e9a40a5029cc7dd4ee61454b62466 (patch)
tree73a90d41abb7adbf0888e4ed9286289bb6b4fa84 /src/kernel
parent2765d6f3434c101fe2d46e9313e540aa680fbd77 (diff)
downloadbitcoin-cf5f1faa037e9a40a5029cc7dd4ee61454b62466.tar.xz
MOVEONLY: DisconnectedBlockTransactions to its own file
This struct is only used in validation + tests and has very little to do with txmempool.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/kernel')
-rw-r--r--src/kernel/disconnected_transactions.h128
1 files changed, 128 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/kernel/disconnected_transactions.h b/src/kernel/disconnected_transactions.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..a5d02c33ee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/kernel/disconnected_transactions.h
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2023 The Bitcoin Core developers
+// Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
+// file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
+
+#ifndef BITCOIN_KERNEL_DISCONNECTED_TRANSACTIONS_H
+#define BITCOIN_KERNEL_DISCONNECTED_TRANSACTIONS_H
+
+#include <core_memusage.h>
+#include <memusage.h>
+#include <primitives/transaction.h>
+#include <util/hasher.h>
+
+#include <list>
+#include <unordered_map>
+
+/**
+ * DisconnectedBlockTransactions
+
+ * During the reorg, it's desirable to re-add previously confirmed transactions
+ * to the mempool, so that anything not re-confirmed in the new chain is
+ * available to be mined. However, it's more efficient to wait until the reorg
+ * is complete and process all still-unconfirmed transactions at that time,
+ * since we expect most confirmed transactions to (typically) still be
+ * confirmed in the new chain, and re-accepting to the memory pool is expensive
+ * (and therefore better to not do in the middle of reorg-processing).
+ * Instead, store the disconnected transactions (in order!) as we go, remove any
+ * that are included in blocks in the new chain, and then process the remaining
+ * still-unconfirmed transactions at the end.
+ *
+ * Order of queuedTx:
+ * The front of the list should be the most recently-confirmed transactions (transactions at the
+ * end of vtx of blocks closer to the tip). If memory usage grows too large, we trim from the front
+ * of the list. After trimming, transactions can be re-added to the mempool from the back of the
+ * list to the front without running into missing inputs.
+ */
+class DisconnectedBlockTransactions {
+private:
+ /** Cached dynamic memory usage for the CTransactions (memory for the shared pointers is
+ * included in the container calculations). */
+ uint64_t cachedInnerUsage = 0;
+ std::list<CTransactionRef> queuedTx;
+ using TxList = decltype(queuedTx);
+ std::unordered_map<uint256, TxList::iterator, SaltedTxidHasher> iters_by_txid;
+
+public:
+ // It's almost certainly a logic bug if we don't clear out queuedTx before
+ // destruction, as we add to it while disconnecting blocks, and then we
+ // need to re-process remaining transactions to ensure mempool consistency.
+ // For now, assert() that we've emptied out this object on destruction.
+ // This assert() can always be removed if the reorg-processing code were
+ // to be refactored such that this assumption is no longer true (for
+ // instance if there was some other way we cleaned up the mempool after a
+ // reorg, besides draining this object).
+ ~DisconnectedBlockTransactions() {
+ assert(queuedTx.empty());
+ assert(iters_by_txid.empty());
+ assert(cachedInnerUsage == 0);
+ }
+
+ size_t DynamicMemoryUsage() const {
+ return cachedInnerUsage + memusage::DynamicUsage(iters_by_txid) + memusage::DynamicUsage(queuedTx);
+ }
+
+ /** Add transactions from the block, iterating through vtx in reverse order. Callers should call
+ * this function for blocks in descending order by block height.
+ * We assume that callers never pass multiple transactions with the same txid, otherwise things
+ * can go very wrong in removeForBlock due to queuedTx containing an item without a
+ * corresponding entry in iters_by_txid.
+ */
+ void AddTransactionsFromBlock(const std::vector<CTransactionRef>& vtx)
+ {
+ iters_by_txid.reserve(iters_by_txid.size() + vtx.size());
+ for (auto block_it = vtx.rbegin(); block_it != vtx.rend(); ++block_it) {
+ auto it = queuedTx.insert(queuedTx.end(), *block_it);
+ iters_by_txid.emplace((*block_it)->GetHash(), it);
+ cachedInnerUsage += RecursiveDynamicUsage(**block_it);
+ }
+ }
+
+ /** Remove any entries that are in this block. */
+ void removeForBlock(const std::vector<CTransactionRef>& vtx)
+ {
+ // Short-circuit in the common case of a block being added to the tip
+ if (queuedTx.empty()) {
+ return;
+ }
+ for (const auto& tx : vtx) {
+ auto iter = iters_by_txid.find(tx->GetHash());
+ if (iter != iters_by_txid.end()) {
+ auto list_iter = iter->second;
+ iters_by_txid.erase(iter);
+ cachedInnerUsage -= RecursiveDynamicUsage(**list_iter);
+ queuedTx.erase(list_iter);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ /** Remove the first entry and update memory usage. */
+ CTransactionRef take_first()
+ {
+ CTransactionRef first_tx;
+ if (!queuedTx.empty()) {
+ first_tx = queuedTx.front();
+ cachedInnerUsage -= RecursiveDynamicUsage(*queuedTx.front());
+ iters_by_txid.erase(queuedTx.front()->GetHash());
+ queuedTx.pop_front();
+ }
+ return first_tx;
+ }
+
+ size_t size() const { return queuedTx.size(); }
+
+ void clear()
+ {
+ cachedInnerUsage = 0;
+ iters_by_txid.clear();
+ queuedTx.clear();
+ }
+
+ /** Clear all data structures and return the list of transactions. */
+ std::list<CTransactionRef> take()
+ {
+ std::list<CTransactionRef> ret = std::move(queuedTx);
+ clear();
+ return ret;
+ }
+};
+#endif // BITCOIN_KERNEL_DISCONNECTED_TRANSACTIONS_H