Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30058: Encapsulate warnings in generalized node::Warnings and remove globals

260f8da71a35232d859d7705861fc1a88bfbbe81 refactor: remove warnings globals (stickies-v)
9c4b0b7ce459765fa1a63b410c3423b90f0d2a5f node: update uiInterface whenever warnings updated (stickies-v)
b071ad9770b7ae7fc718dcbfdc8f62dffbf6cfee introduce and use the generalized `node::Warnings` interface (stickies-v)
20e616f86444d00712ac7eb840666e2b0378af4a move-only: move warnings from common to node (stickies-v)
bed29c481aebeb2b0160450c63c03cc68fb89bc6 refactor: remove unnecessary AppendWarning helper function (stickies-v)

Pull request description:

  This PR:
  - moves warnings from common to the node library and into the node namespace (as suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29845#discussion_r1570069541)
  - generalizes the warnings interface to `Warnings::Set()` and `Warnings::Unset()` methods, instead of having a separate function and globals for each warning. As a result, this simplifies the `kernel::Notifications` interface.
  - removes warnings.cpp from the kernel library
  - removes warning globals
  - adds testing for the warning logic

  Behaviour change introduced:
  - the `-alertnotify` command is executed for all `KernelNotifications::warningSet` calls, which now also covers the `LARGE_WORK_INVALID_CHAIN` warning
  - the GUI is updated automatically whenever a warning is (un)set, covering some code paths where it previously wouldn't be, e.g. when `node::AbortNode()` is called, or for the `LARGE_WORK_INVALID_CHAIN` warning

  Some discussion points:
  - ~is `const std::string& id` the best way to refer to warnings? Enums are an obvious alternative, but since we need to define warnings across libraries, strings seem like a straightforward solution.~ _edit: updated approach to use `node::Warning` and `kernel::Warning` enums._

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK 260f8da71a35232d859d7705861fc1a88bfbbe81
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK 260f8da71a35232d859d7705861fc1a88bfbbe81. Only change since last review was rebasing
  TheCharlatan:
    Re-ACK 260f8da71a35232d859d7705861fc1a88bfbbe81

Tree-SHA512: a3fcedaee0d3ad64e9c111aeb30665162f98e0e72acd6a70b76ff2ddf4f0a34da4f97ce353c322a1668ca6ee4d8a81cc6e6d170c5bbeb7a43cffdaf66646b588

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/src/bitcoind.cpp b/src/bitcoind.cpp
index 0b89aa42af..a09bb5c9da 100644
--- a/src/bitcoind.cpp
+++ b/src/bitcoind.cpp
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 #include <kernel/context.h>
 #include <node/context.h>
 #include <node/interface_ui.h>
+#include <node/warnings.h>
 #include <noui.h>
 #include <util/check.h>
 #include <util/exception.h>
@@ -181,6 +182,8 @@ static bool AppInit(NodeContext& node)
             return false;
         }
 
+        node.warnings = std::make_unique<node::Warnings>();
+
         node.kernel = std::make_unique<kernel::Context>();
         node.ecc_context = std::make_unique<ECC_Context>();
         if (!AppInitSanityChecks(*node.kernel))