aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>2018-01-25 08:04:33 -0500
committerMarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>2018-01-25 08:04:51 -0500
commit598a9c4e4dcd03c6d80fba005de729a6a3aeba7e (patch)
tree737acedfd3ef3f5e3a9c2ba96276e7b8c2cb4f14
parent6970b30c6f1d2be7947295fe18f2390649b17a4b (diff)
parent1e2e09e2f6382ed239d974720126c642c3e3690c (diff)
downloadbitcoin-598a9c4e4dcd03c6d80fba005de729a6a3aeba7e.tar.xz
Merge #12264: Fix versionbits warning test
1e2e09e2f6 Fix intermittent failure in p2p-versionbits-warning.py (John Newbery) 3bbd843708 Improve comments/logging in p2p-versionbits-warning.py (John Newbery) ef2beb2c13 Fix flake8 warnings in p2p-versionbits-warning.py (John Newbery) Pull request description: fixes #12259 (and tidies up the test) The problem was that the node was still in IBD at the point the last block was generated. UpdateTip() will not generate a warning if the node is still in IBD: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/cc5870a4057f0322509dde5877fb08258bf4ec50/src/validation.cpp#L2151 The 'proper' fix would be to remove the overenthusiastic latching in DoWarning: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/cc5870a4057f0322509dde5877fb08258bf4ec50/src/validation.cpp#L2135 so that more than one warning message can be output to `alertnotify`. Really we should suppress multiple messages of the same type, but allow messages to be output if they're for different warnings. That would mean the test wouldn't need to stop-start the node. Tree-SHA512: 5c9aa5af7eba3c1350ea28482d57d3d79e3166c6224ceddb5d5a631090081d890d7403015e41f413c22990959a488cf1231f88bb825c54a609b24f89c450a1f6
-rwxr-xr-xtest/functional/feature_versionbits_warning.py131
1 files changed, 61 insertions, 70 deletions
diff --git a/test/functional/feature_versionbits_warning.py b/test/functional/feature_versionbits_warning.py
index 0bfe94622f..2985569a8f 100755
--- a/test/functional/feature_versionbits_warning.py
+++ b/test/functional/feature_versionbits_warning.py
@@ -7,25 +7,24 @@
Generate chains with block versions that appear to be signalling unknown
soft-forks, and test that warning alerts are generated.
"""
-
-from test_framework.mininode import *
-from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
-from test_framework.util import *
+import os
import re
+
from test_framework.blocktools import create_block, create_coinbase
+from test_framework.messages import msg_block
+from test_framework.mininode import P2PInterface, network_thread_start, mininode_lock
+from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
+from test_framework.util import wait_until
-VB_PERIOD = 144 # versionbits period length for regtest
-VB_THRESHOLD = 108 # versionbits activation threshold for regtest
+VB_PERIOD = 144 # versionbits period length for regtest
+VB_THRESHOLD = 108 # versionbits activation threshold for regtest
VB_TOP_BITS = 0x20000000
-VB_UNKNOWN_BIT = 27 # Choose a bit unassigned to any deployment
+VB_UNKNOWN_BIT = 27 # Choose a bit unassigned to any deployment
+VB_UNKNOWN_VERSION = VB_TOP_BITS | (1 << VB_UNKNOWN_BIT)
WARN_UNKNOWN_RULES_MINED = "Unknown block versions being mined! It's possible unknown rules are in effect"
WARN_UNKNOWN_RULES_ACTIVE = "unknown new rules activated (versionbit {})".format(VB_UNKNOWN_BIT)
-VB_PATTERN = re.compile("^Warning.*versionbit")
-
-class TestNode(P2PInterface):
- def on_inv(self, message):
- pass
+VB_PATTERN = re.compile("Warning: unknown new rules activated.*versionbit")
class VersionBitsWarningTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
def set_test_params(self):
@@ -35,21 +34,21 @@ class VersionBitsWarningTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
def setup_network(self):
self.alert_filename = os.path.join(self.options.tmpdir, "alert.txt")
# Open and close to create zero-length file
- with open(self.alert_filename, 'w', encoding='utf8') as _:
+ with open(self.alert_filename, 'w', encoding='utf8'):
pass
self.extra_args = [["-alertnotify=echo %s >> \"" + self.alert_filename + "\""]]
self.setup_nodes()
- # Send numblocks blocks via peer with nVersionToUse set.
- def send_blocks_with_version(self, peer, numblocks, nVersionToUse):
+ def send_blocks_with_version(self, peer, numblocks, version):
+ """Send numblocks blocks to peer with version set"""
tip = self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash()
height = self.nodes[0].getblockcount()
- block_time = self.nodes[0].getblockheader(tip)["time"]+1
+ block_time = self.nodes[0].getblockheader(tip)["time"] + 1
tip = int(tip, 16)
for _ in range(numblocks):
- block = create_block(tip, create_coinbase(height+1), block_time)
- block.nVersion = nVersionToUse
+ block = create_block(tip, create_coinbase(height + 1), block_time)
+ block.nVersion = version
block.solve()
peer.send_message(msg_block(block))
block_time += 1
@@ -57,65 +56,57 @@ class VersionBitsWarningTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
tip = block.sha256
peer.sync_with_ping()
- def test_versionbits_in_alert_file(self):
- with open(self.alert_filename, 'r', encoding='utf8') as f:
- alert_text = f.read()
- assert(VB_PATTERN.match(alert_text))
+ def versionbits_in_alert_file(self):
+ """Test that the versionbits warning has been written to the alert file."""
+ alert_text = open(self.alert_filename, 'r', encoding='utf8').read()
+ return VB_PATTERN.search(alert_text) is not None
def run_test(self):
- # Setup the p2p connection and start up the network thread.
- self.nodes[0].add_p2p_connection(TestNode())
-
+ # Handy alias
+ node = self.nodes[0]
+ node.add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface())
network_thread_start()
+ node.p2p.wait_for_verack()
- # Test logic begins here
- self.nodes[0].p2p.wait_for_verack()
-
- # 1. Have the node mine one period worth of blocks
- self.nodes[0].generate(VB_PERIOD)
-
- # 2. Now build one period of blocks on the tip, with < VB_THRESHOLD
- # blocks signaling some unknown bit.
- nVersion = VB_TOP_BITS | (1<<VB_UNKNOWN_BIT)
- self.send_blocks_with_version(self.nodes[0].p2p, VB_THRESHOLD-1, nVersion)
-
- # Fill rest of period with regular version blocks
- self.nodes[0].generate(VB_PERIOD - VB_THRESHOLD + 1)
- # Check that we're not getting any versionbit-related errors in
- # get*info()
- assert(not VB_PATTERN.match(self.nodes[0].getmininginfo()["warnings"]))
- assert(not VB_PATTERN.match(self.nodes[0].getnetworkinfo()["warnings"]))
-
- # 3. Now build one period of blocks with >= VB_THRESHOLD blocks signaling
- # some unknown bit
- self.send_blocks_with_version(self.nodes[0].p2p, VB_THRESHOLD, nVersion)
- self.nodes[0].generate(VB_PERIOD - VB_THRESHOLD)
- # Might not get a versionbits-related alert yet, as we should
- # have gotten a different alert due to more than 51/100 blocks
- # being of unexpected version.
- # Check that get*info() shows some kind of error.
- assert(WARN_UNKNOWN_RULES_MINED in self.nodes[0].getmininginfo()["warnings"])
- assert(WARN_UNKNOWN_RULES_MINED in self.nodes[0].getnetworkinfo()["warnings"])
+ # Mine one period worth of blocks
+ node.generate(VB_PERIOD)
- # Mine a period worth of expected blocks so the generic block-version warning
- # is cleared, and restart the node. This should move the versionbit state
- # to ACTIVE.
- self.nodes[0].generate(VB_PERIOD)
- self.stop_nodes()
- # Empty out the alert file
- with open(self.alert_filename, 'w', encoding='utf8') as _:
- pass
- self.start_nodes()
+ self.log.info("Check that there is no warning if previous VB_BLOCKS have <VB_THRESHOLD blocks with unknown versionbits version.")
+ # Build one period of blocks with < VB_THRESHOLD blocks signaling some unknown bit
+ self.send_blocks_with_version(node.p2p, VB_THRESHOLD - 1, VB_UNKNOWN_VERSION)
+ node.generate(VB_PERIOD - VB_THRESHOLD + 1)
+
+ # Check that we're not getting any versionbit-related errors in get*info()
+ assert(not VB_PATTERN.match(node.getmininginfo()["warnings"]))
+ assert(not VB_PATTERN.match(node.getnetworkinfo()["warnings"]))
- # Connecting one block should be enough to generate an error.
- self.nodes[0].generate(1)
- assert(WARN_UNKNOWN_RULES_ACTIVE in self.nodes[0].getmininginfo()["warnings"])
- assert(WARN_UNKNOWN_RULES_ACTIVE in self.nodes[0].getnetworkinfo()["warnings"])
- self.stop_nodes()
- self.test_versionbits_in_alert_file()
+ self.log.info("Check that there is a warning if >50 blocks in the last 100 were an unknown version")
+ # Build one period of blocks with VB_THRESHOLD blocks signaling some unknown bit
+ self.send_blocks_with_version(node.p2p, VB_THRESHOLD, VB_UNKNOWN_VERSION)
+ node.generate(VB_PERIOD - VB_THRESHOLD)
- # Test framework expects the node to still be running...
- self.start_nodes()
+ # Check that get*info() shows the 51/100 unknown block version error.
+ assert(WARN_UNKNOWN_RULES_MINED in node.getmininginfo()["warnings"])
+ assert(WARN_UNKNOWN_RULES_MINED in node.getnetworkinfo()["warnings"])
+
+ self.log.info("Check that there is a warning if previous VB_BLOCKS have >=VB_THRESHOLD blocks with unknown versionbits version.")
+ # Mine a period worth of expected blocks so the generic block-version warning
+ # is cleared. This will move the versionbit state to ACTIVE.
+ node.generate(VB_PERIOD)
+
+ # Stop-start the node. This is required because bitcoind will only warn once about unknown versions or unknown rules activating.
+ self.restart_node(0)
+
+ # Generating one block guarantees that we'll get out of IBD
+ node.generate(1)
+ wait_until(lambda: not node.getblockchaininfo()['initialblockdownload'], timeout=10, lock=mininode_lock)
+ # Generating one more block will be enough to generate an error.
+ node.generate(1)
+ # Check that get*info() shows the versionbits unknown rules warning
+ assert(WARN_UNKNOWN_RULES_ACTIVE in node.getmininginfo()["warnings"])
+ assert(WARN_UNKNOWN_RULES_ACTIVE in node.getnetworkinfo()["warnings"])
+ # Check that the alert file shows the versionbits unknown rules warning
+ wait_until(lambda: self.versionbits_in_alert_file(), timeout=60)
if __name__ == '__main__':
VersionBitsWarningTest().main()