1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
|
<pre>
BIP: 123
Layer: Process
Title: BIP Classification
Author: Eric Lombrozo
Status: Draft
Type: Process
Created: 2015-08-26
</pre>
==Abstract==
This document describes a classification scheme for BIPs.
BIPs are classified by system layers with lower numbered layers involving more intricate interoperability requirements.
The specification defines the layers and sets forth specific criteria for deciding to which layer a particular standards BIP belongs.
==Motivation==
Bitcoin is a system involving a number of different standards. Some standards are absolute requirements for interoperability while others can be considered optional, giving implementors a choice of whether to support them.
In order to have a BIP process which more closely reflects the interoperability requirements, it is necessary to categorize BIPs accordingly. Lower layers present considerably greater challenges in getting standards accepted and deployed.
==Specification==
Standards BIPs are placed in one of four layers:
# Consensus
# Peer Services
# API/RPC
# Applications
===1. Consensus Layer===
The consensus layer defines cryptographic commitment structures. Its purpose is ensuring that anyone can locally evaluate whether a particular state and history is valid, providing settlement guarantees, and assuring eventual convergence.
The consensus layer is not concerned with how messages are propagated on a network.
Disagreements over the consensus layer can result in network partitioning, or forks, where different nodes might end up accepting different incompatible histories. We further subdivide consensus layer changes into soft forks and hard forks.
====Soft Forks====
In a soft fork, some structures that were valid under the old rules are no longer valid under the new rules. Structures that were invalid under the old rules continue to be invalid under the new rules.
====Hard Forks====
In a hard fork, structures that were invalid under the old rules become valid under the new rules.
===2. Peer Services Layer===
The peer services layer specifies how nodes find each other and propagate messages.
Only a subset of all specified peer services are required for basic node interoperability. Nodes can support further optional extensions.
It is always possible to add new services without breaking compatibility with existing services, then gradually deprecate older services. In this manner, the entire network can be upgraded without serious risks of service disruption.
===3. API/RPC Layer===
The API/RPC layer specifies higher level calls accessible to applications. Support for these BIPs is not required for basic network interoperability but might be expected by some client applications.
There's room at this layer to allow for competing standards without breaking basic network interoperability.
===4. Applications Layer===
The applications layer specifies high level structures, abstractions, and conventions that allow different applications to support similar features and share data.
==Classification of existing BIPs==
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width: auto; text-align: center; font-size: smaller; table-layout: fixed;"
!Number
!Layer
!Title
!Owner
!Type
!Status
|- style="background-color: #cfffcf"
| [[bip-0001.mediawiki|1]]
| Process
| BIP Purpose and Guidelines
| Amir Taaki
| Standard
| Active
|-
| [[bip-0010.mediawiki|10]]
| Applications
| Multi-Sig Transaction Distribution
| Alan Reiner
| Informational
| Withdrawn
|- style="background-color: #cfffcf"
| [[bip-0011.mediawiki|11]]
| Peer Services
| M-of-N Standard Transactions
| Gavin Andresen
| Standard
| Accepted
|- style="background-color: #ffcfcf"
| [[bip-0012.mediawiki|12]]
| Consensus (soft fork)
| OP_EVAL
| Gavin Andresen
| Standard
| Withdrawn
|- style="background-color: #cfffcf"
| [[bip-0013.mediawiki|13]]
| Applications
| Address Format for pay-to-script-hash
| Gavin Andresen
| Standard
| Final
|- style="background-color: #cfffcf"
| [[bip-0014.mediawiki|14]]
| Peer Services
| Protocol Version and User Agent
| Amir Taaki, Patrick Strateman
| Standard
| Accepted
|- style="background-color: #ffcfcf"
| [[bip-0015.mediawiki|15]]
| Applications
| Aliases
| Amir Taaki
| Standard
| Deferred
|- style="background-color: #cfffcf"
| [[bip-0016.mediawiki|16]]
| Consensus (soft fork)
| Pay To Script Hash
| Gavin Andresen
| Standard
| Final
|- style="background-color: #ffcfcf"
| [[bip-0017.mediawiki|17]]
| Consensus (soft fork)
| OP_CHECKHASHVERIFY (CHV)
| Luke Dashjr
| Withdrawn
| Draft
|-
| [[bip-0018.mediawiki|18]]
| Consensus (soft fork)
| hashScriptCheck
| Luke Dashjr
| Standard
| Draft
|-
| [[bip-0019.mediawiki|19]]
| Peer Services
| M-of-N Standard Transactions (Low SigOp)
| Luke Dashjr
| Standard
| Draft
|- style="background-color: #ffcfcf"
| [[bip-0020.mediawiki|20]]
| Applications
| URI Scheme
| Luke Dashjr
| Standard
| Replaced
|- style="background-color: #cfffcf"
| [[bip-0021.mediawiki|21]]
| Applications
| URI Scheme
| Nils Schneider, Matt Corallo
| Standard
| Accepted
|- style="background-color: #cfffcf"
| [[bip-0022.mediawiki|22]]
| API/RPC
| getblocktemplate - Fundamentals
| Luke Dashjr
| Standard
| Accepted
|- style="background-color: #cfffcf"
| [[bip-0023.mediawiki|23]]
| API/RPC
| getblocktemplate - Pooled Mining
| Luke Dashjr
| Standard
| Accepted
|- style="background-color: #cfffcf"
| [[bip-0030.mediawiki|30]]
| Consensus (soft fork)
| Duplicate transactions
| Pieter Wuille
| Standard
| Final
|- style="background-color: #cfffcf"
| [[bip-0031.mediawiki|31]]
| Peer Services
| Pong message
| Mike Hearn
| Standard
| Accepted
|- style="background-color: #cfffcf"
| [[bip-0032.mediawiki|32]]
| Applications
| Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets
| Pieter Wuille
| Informational
| Accepted
|-
| [[bip-0033.mediawiki|33]]
| API/RPC
| Stratized Nodes
| Amir Taaki
| Standard
| Draft
|- style="background-color: #cfffcf"
| [[bip-0034.mediawiki|34]]
| Consensus (soft fork)
| Block v2, Height in coinbase
| Gavin Andresen
| Standard
| Accepted
|- style="background-color: #cfffcf"
| [[bip-0035.mediawiki|35]]
| Peer Services
| mempool message
| Jeff Garzik
| Standard
| Accepted
|-
| [[bip-0036.mediawiki|36]]
| Peer Services
| Custom Services
| Stefan Thomas
| Standard
| Draft
|- style="background-color: #cfffcf"
| [[bip-0037.mediawiki|37]]
| Peer Services
| Bloom filtering
| Mike Hearn and Matt Corallo
| Standard
| Accepted
|-
| [[bip-0038.mediawiki|38]]
| Applications
| Passphrase-protected private key
| Mike Caldwell
| Standard
| Draft
|-
| [[bip-0039.mediawiki|39]]
| Applications
| Mnemonic code for generating deterministic keys
| Slush
| Standard
| Draft
|-
| 40
| Applications
| Stratum wire protocol
| Slush
| Standard
| BIP number allocated
|-
| 41
| Applications
| Stratum mining protocol
| Slush
| Standard
| BIP number allocated
|-
| [[bip-0042.mediawiki|42]]
| Consensus (soft fork)
| A finite monetary supply for Bitcoin
| Pieter Wuille
| Standard
| Draft
|-
| [[bip-0043.mediawiki|43]]
| Applications
| Purpose Field for Deterministic Wallets
| Slush
| Standard
| Draft
|-
| [[bip-0044.mediawiki|44]]
| Applications
| Multi-Account Hierarchy for Deterministic Wallets
| Slush
| Standard
| Draft
|-
| [[bip-0045.mediawiki|45]]
| Applications
| Structure for Deterministic P2SH Multisignature Wallets
| Manuel Araoz
| Standard
| Draft
|-
| [[bip-0050.mediawiki|50]]
| Informational
| March 2013 Chain Fork Post-Mortem
| Gavin Andresen
| Informational
| Draft
<!-- 50 series reserved for a group of post-mortems -->
|-
| [[bip-0060.mediawiki|60]]
| Peer Services
| Fixed Length "version" Message (Relay-Transactions Field)
| Amir Taaki
| Standard
| Draft
|-
| [[bip-0061.mediawiki|61]]
| Peer Services
| "reject" P2P message
| Gavin Andresen
| Standard
| Final
|-
| [[bip-0062.mediawiki|62]]
| Consensus (soft fork)
| Dealing with malleability
| Pieter Wuille
| Standard
| Draft
|-
| 63
| Applications
| Stealth Addresses
| Peter Todd
| Standard
| BIP number allocated
|-
| [[bip-0064.mediawiki|64]]
| Peer Services
| getutxos message
| Mike Hearn
| Standard
| Draft
|-
| [[bip-0065.mediawiki|65]]
| Consensus (soft fork)
| OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY
| Peter Todd
| Standard
| Draft
|-
| [[bip-0066.mediawiki|66]]
| Consensus (soft fork)
| Strict DER signatures
| Pieter Wuille
| Standard
| Draft
|-
| [[bip-0067.mediawiki|67]]
| Applications
| Deterministic P2SH multi-signature addresses
| Thomas Kerin
| Standard
| Draft
|-
| [[bip-0068.mediawiki|68]]
| Consensus (soft fork)
| Consensus-enforced transaction replacement signalled via sequence numbers
| Mark Friedenbach
| Standard
| Draft
|-
| [[bip-0070.mediawiki|70]]
| Applications
| Payment protocol
| Gavin Andresen
| Standard
| Final
|-
| [[bip-0071.mediawiki|71]]
| Applications
| Payment protocol MIME types
| Gavin Andresen
| Standard
| Final
|-
| [[bip-0072.mediawiki|72]]
| Applications
| Payment protocol URIs
| Gavin Andresen
| Standard
| Final
|-
| [[bip-0073.mediawiki|73]]
| Applications
| Use "Accept" header with Payment Request URLs
| Stephen Pair
| Standard
| Draft
|-
| [[bip-0101.mediawiki|101]]
| Consensus (hard fork)
| Increase maximum block size
| Gavin Andresen
| Standard
| Draft
|}
|