updated BIP number and examples

1 files changed, 12 insertions, 12 deletions

diff --git a/bip-draft.mediawiki b/bip-draft.mediawiki
index 9372d7b..f80cf1b 100644
--- a/bip-draft.mediawiki
+++ b/bip-draft.mediawiki
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 <pre>
-  BIP: TBD
+  BIP: 175
   Layer: Applications
   Title: Pay to Contract Protocol
   Author: Omar Shibli <omar@commerceblock.com>
           Nicholas Gregory <nicholas@commerceblock.com>
   Comments-Summary: No comments yet.
-  Comments-URI: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/wiki/Comments:BIP-TBD
+  Comments-URI: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/wiki/Comments:BIP-0175
   Status: Draft
   Type: Informational Track
   Created: 2017-07-17
@@ -60,10 +60,10 @@ Each level has special meaning described in the chapters below.
 
 ===Purpose===
 
-Purpose is a constant set to <code>TBD'</code> (or <code>TBD</code>) following the BIP-0043 recommendation. It indicates that the subtree of this node is used according to this specification.
+Purpose is a constant set to <code>175'</code> (or <code>0x800000AF</code>) following the BIP-0043 recommendation. It indicates that the subtree of this node is used according to this specification.
 
 <code>
-m / TBD' / *
+m / 175' / *
 </code>
 
 Hardened derivation is used at this level.
@@ -141,9 +141,9 @@ For the following given inputs:
 we can compute payment base as follows:
 
   payment base derivation path:
-  m/999'/0'
+  m/175'/0'
   contract base public extended key:
-  xpub6A7Bkv1CFa275xd2vyheGLS1NX8zNizxU82ufcL3fnwnhS7DBpruR16oSFZGUQVtJNEjghCe3ZdPManUWCZFJo6t5U98KC2cYMpXtqNCwi3
+  xpub6B3JSEWjqm5GgfzcjPwBixxLPzi15pFM3jq4E4yCzXXUFS5MFdXiSdw7b5dbdPGHuc7c1V4zXbbFRtc9G1njMUt9ZvMdGVGYQSQsurD6HAW
 
 In the below examples, we are going to use SHA256 as a cryptographic hash function, and the above contract base public key.
 
@@ -184,15 +184,15 @@ As an input, we have a contract that consists of two documents, below are conten
 
   contract_base_pub/60466/7653/27379/46703/46238/35279/58182/22051/34991/14461/46729/5725/28518/10809/20520/27223
   or
-  m/999'/0'/60466/7653/27379/46703/46238/35279/58182/22051/34991/14461/46729/5725/28518/10809/20520/27223
+  m/175'/0'/60466/7653/27379/46703/46238/35279/58182/22051/34991/14461/46729/5725/28518/10809/20520/27223
 
 6. Compute public extended key.
 
-  xpub6h8197UZpVMsYirUuHZUDbn8d8dewqW6UkZiXFNRf6WsvkgDsJQN5Atn8PUExFmyofccfoY6dMWqb9SpnJ5HDibi6kKbq931Z531ELCXHTn
+  xpub6hML7vSU2Hwww9ctwrwt4ijnhJr4n6XaMRox1nnF3PvZKuF1SZoTymnKQHrF9fp2nWJSqv5ZjJSxJJQ8A3PKcBUWhGvTFmuRKpycSCr5coz
 
 7. Compute address of the public extended key (P2PKH).
 
-  1LeYXs63uVSDu2XSb82xdEc7RumohCpB7Q
+  1HYjhPTtMmpBJBd5tVepZDAVdvPA7o8KHJ
 
 
 verification example 1 (negative test):
@@ -218,15 +218,15 @@ Similarliy to the input above, excpet this time we have a contract that consists
 
   contract_base_pub/14856/24664/10561/15584/48981/6920/53790/18984/56282/28224/32656/61425/50248/59449/1292/29601
   or
-  m/999'/0'/14856/24664/10561/15584/48981/6920/53790/18984/56282/28224/32656/61425/50248/59449/1292/29601
+  m/175'/0'/14856/24664/10561/15584/48981/6920/53790/18984/56282/28224/32656/61425/50248/59449/1292/29601
 
 5. Compute public extended key.
 
-  xpub6gvNX6yBEaBu5nGg9rrtEQgSgvAL5vtcbD8MpCfQgd1Wzuga8Kk3bJkhpTzDWvsx5sLj65UQvQaAgW34SwnGBEmxLvWDshBgPyJstd6RQdB
+  xpub6gujKWRhegHXKZBkrprW55oSL6UxYhStxF5FtoUNa4KShLxLPDLQTS39XAwRhdCSvuAv2wogwukmfk3fS7CM6pT6QWwJHiCTw7RkwXMgThy
 
 7. Compute address of the public extended key (P2PKH).
 
-  1JwnGxLhT9K6RbUsWcjL2mtmpPEHsLFvXG
+  162KDdRXa3KPgYkH3d1DDKfddacH1gn1n8
 
 8. As expected the address doesn't match the Bitcoin address from the last example <code>1LeYXs63uVSDu2XSb82xdEc7RumohCpB7Q</code>.