summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/bip-0075/mobile-sf-ir-with-payment.png
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTim Ruffing <crypto@timruffing.de>2019-12-12 22:49:21 +0100
committerPieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>2020-01-19 14:47:33 -0800
commitad6bb6c1ff5a88b0f91f9363964cf39581d650ad (patch)
tree536277c76450fef1b6df8690f65f2a1768e30382 /bip-0075/mobile-sf-ir-with-payment.png
parent966eadca3a8f5ea118ca98e45cf37f165b399f0a (diff)
Clarify why we don't want short hashes
This is supposed to supersede https://github.com/sipa/bips/pull/158. I tried to say this carefully. I don't think that multiparty signing is in general broken with short hashes. For example the attack in #158 could be avoided by letting everybody not only commit to the nonce but also to the message. It's just that using a collision-resistant hash just eliminates the problem entirely...
Diffstat (limited to 'bip-0075/mobile-sf-ir-with-payment.png')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions