diff options
author | Justus Ranvier <justusranvier@riseup.net> | 2015-06-19 18:27:37 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Justus Ranvier <justusranvier@riseup.net> | 2015-07-10 12:36:02 -0500 |
commit | 1612a0016a21d72a67886661913002ccdc4b839f (patch) | |
tree | 606d6dea87c9ab0c385e1681da4a2dcfa695d620 /bip-0047.mediawiki | |
parent | a7c05e17b3ce357e5d180dc0ab46f53979ac59ae (diff) |
BIP-0047: Reusable payment codes
Payment codes are SPV-friendly alternatives to DarkWallet-style stealth
addresses which provide useful features such as positively identifying
senders to recipients and automatically providing for transaction refunds.
Payment codes can be publicly advertised and associated with a real-life
identity without causing a loss of financial privacy.
Compared to stealth addresses, payment codes require less blockchain data
storage.
Payment codes require 65 bytes of OP_RETURN data per sender-recipient pair,
while stealth addresses require 40 bytes per transaction.
Diffstat (limited to 'bip-0047.mediawiki')
-rw-r--r-- | bip-0047.mediawiki | 236 |
1 files changed, 236 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/bip-0047.mediawiki b/bip-0047.mediawiki new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ab005b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/bip-0047.mediawiki @@ -0,0 +1,236 @@ +<pre> + BIP: 47 + Title: Reusable Payment Codes for Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets + Authors: Justus Ranvier <justus@openbitcoinprivacyproject.org> + Status: Draft + Type: Informational + Created: 2015-04-24 +</pre> + +==Abstract== + +This BIP defines a technique for creating a payment code which can be publicly advertised and associated with a real-life identity without creating the loss of security or privacy inherent to P2PKH address reuse. + +This BIP is a particular application of BIP43 and is intended to supplement HD wallets which implement BIP44. + +The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119. + +==Motivation== + +Payment codes add identity information to transactions which is useful in a merchant-customer interaction while protecting the privacy of users. Payment codes provide the privacy benefits of Darkwallet-style Stealth Addresses to SPV clients without requiring the assistance of a trusted full node and while greatly reducing reliance on blockchain storage. + +==Path levels== + +We define the following 3 levels in BIP32 path: + +<pre> +m / purpose' / coin_type' / identity' +</pre> + +Apostrophe in the path indicates that BIP32 hardened derivation is used. + +Each level has a special meaning, described in the chapters below. + +===Purpose=== + +Purpose is a constant set following the BIP43 recommendation to: the ASCII value of "47" with the most signifigant bit set to indicate hardened derivation (0x8000002F). It indicates that the subtree of this node is used according to this specification. + +Hardened derivation is used at this level. + +===Coin type=== + +The coin type field is identical to the same field in BIP44 + +Hardened derivation is used at this level. + +===Identity=== + +Identity is a particular extended public/private key pair. The extended public key is a payment code. + +Identities SHOULD have 1:1 correspondence with a BIP44 account, as in each BIP44 account in an HD wallet should be assigned exactly one payment code which shares the same index value. + +Hardened derivation is used at this level. + +Except where noted, all keys derived from a payment code use the public derivation method. + +====Binary Serialization==== + +A payment code contains the following elements: + +* Byte 0: type. required value: 0x01 +* Byte 1: features bit field. All bits must be zero except where specified elsewhere in this specification +** Bit 0: Bitmessage notification +** Bits 1-7: reserved +* Byte 2: sign. required value: 0x02 or 0x03 +* Bytes 3 - 34: x value +* Bytes 35 - 66: chain code +* Bytes 67 - 79: optional. reserved for future expansion + +====Base58 Serialization==== + +When a payment code is presented to the user, it SHOULD be presented encoded in Base58Check form. + +* The version byte is: 0x37 (produces a "P" as the first character of the serialized form) +* The payload is the binary serialization of the payment code + +===Protocol=== + +In the following examples, Alice and Bob are identities with a corresponding payment codes. Alice initiates a Bitcoin transaction, and Bob is the recipient of the transaction. + +It is assumed that Alice can easily obtain Bob's payment code via a suitable method outside the scope of the payment code protocol. + +====Definitions==== + +* Payment code: an extended public key which is associated with a particular identity +* Notification address: the P2PKH address associated with the 0<sup>th</sup> public key derived from a payment code +* Notification transaction: a transaction which sends an output to a notification address which includes an embedded payment code + +====Notification Transaction==== + +Prior to the first time Alice initiates a transaction to Bob, Alice MUST inform Bob of her payment code via the following procedure: + +# Alice constructs a transaction which sends a small quantity of bitcoins to Bob's notification address (notification transaction) +## The inputs selected for this transaction MUST NOT be easily associated with Alice's notification address +# Alice derives a unique shared secret using ECDH: +## Alice selects the first exposed public key, of the first pubkey-exposing input, of the transaction: <pre>a</pre> +## Alice selects the public key associated with Bob's notification address: <pre>B, where B = bG</pre> +## Alice calculates a secret point: <pre>S = aB</pre> +## Alice expresses the secret point in compressed DER format, then calculates a scalar shared secret: <pre>s = SHA256(S)</pre> +# Alice serializes her payment code in binary form. +# Alice renders her payment code (P) unreadable to anyone except Bob by: +## Replace the x value with: <pre>s XOR (x value)</pre> +## Replace the chain code with: <pre>sha256(s) XOR (chain code)</pre> +# Alice adds an OP_RETURN output to her transaction which consists of P. +<img src="bip-0047/reusable_payment_codes-01.png" /> + +Now that Bob's client has received Alice's payment code, it is possible for Alice to send payments (up to 2<sup>32</sup> payments) to Bob. + +Alice will never again need to send a notification transaction to Bob. + +Bitcoins received via notification transactions require special handling in order to avoid privacy leaks: + +# The value of outputs received to notification addresses MUST NOT be displayed to the user as part of their spendable balance. +# Outputs received to notification addresses MUST NOT be used as inputs for any transaction that involve ECDH calculations using any of the user's payment codes. +# Outputs received to notification addresses MAY be passed through a mixing service before being added to the user's spendable balance. +# Outputs received to notification addresses MAY be donated to miners using dust-b-gone or an equivalent procedure. + +====Sending==== + +# Each time Alice wants to initiate a transaction to Bob, Alice derives a unique P2PKH address for the transaction using ECDH follows: +## Alice selects the 0th private key derived from her payment code: <pre>a</pre> +## Alice selects the next unused public key derived from Bob's payment code, starting from zero: <pre>B, where B = bG</pre> +### The "next unused" public key is based on an index specific to the Alice-Bob context, not global to either Alice or Bob +## Alice calculates a secret point: <pre>S = aB</pre> +## Alice expresses the secret point in compressed DER format, then calculates a scalar shared secret: <pre>s = SHA256(S)</pre> +### If the value of s is not in the secp256k1 group, Alice MUST increment the index used to derive Bob's public key and try again. +## Alice uses the scalar shared secret to calculate the ephemeral public key used to generate the P2PKH address for this transaction: <pre>B' = B + sG</pre> +<img src="bip-0047/reusable_payment_codes-04.png" /> +<img src="bip-0047/reusable_payment_codes-05.png" /> +# Bob is watching for incoming payments on B' ever since he received the notification transaction from Alice. +## Bob calculates n shared secrets with Alice, using the 0<sup>th</sup> public key derived Alice's payment code, and private keys 0 - n derived from Bob's payment code, where n is his desired lookahead window. +## Bob calculates the ephemeral deposit addresses using the same procedure as Alice: <pre>B' = B + sG</pre> +## Bob calculate the private key for each ephemeral address as: <pre>b' = b + s</pre> +<img src="bip-0047/reusable_payment_codes-02.png" /> +<img src="bip-0047/reusable_payment_codes-03.png" /> + +====Refunds==== + +Because Bob learns Alice's payment code as part of the process of receiving a payment, Bob has all the information he needs in order to send a refund to Alice. + +A refund transaction is identical to a payment transactions, with only the roles of the participants switches. + +Bob MUST send a notification transaction to Alice prior to the first time he sends funds to Alice, even if he has received transactions from her in the past. + +<img src="bip-0047/reusable_payment_codes-06.png" /> + +====Anonymous Payments==== + +If Alice does not want her payment to Bob to be associated with her identity, she generates an ephemeral payment code to use for the transaction. + +* Ephemeral payment codes are the hardened children of a payment code, starting from an index of zero. +* An ephemeral payment code SHOULD only be used for a single outgoing payment. +* The notification address of an ephemeral payment code MUST be monitored for notification transactions in order to detect incoming refund payments +* The correspondence between BIP44 accounts and ephemeral payment codes is 1:many + +====Cold Storage==== + +* Unlike traditional watching-only wallets, those associated with payment codes help in cold storage can not detect incoming payments immediately. +* When the watching-only wallet detects an incoming notification transaction, it packages the transaction in an implementation-specific format suitable for transfer to the offline device. +* The offline device recovers the payment code, then pre-generates a large number of relevant keypairs (example: 10000) in order to minimize the need for air gap round trips. +* The offline device then packages the relevant public keys in an implementation-specific format suitable for transfer to the online device. +* The online device can then watch for incoming payments using a suitable lookahead window. +* If the lookahead window reaches the end of the pre-generated public keys, the user must generate more keys on the offline device and transfer them to the online device. + +====Wallet Recovery==== + +Normal operation of a payment code-enabled wallet can be performed by an SPV client and does not require access to a complete copy of the blockchain. + +Recovering a wallet from a seed, however, does require access to a fully-indexed blockchain. + +The required data may be obtained from copy of the blockchain under the control of the user, or via a publicly-queriable blockchain explorer. + +When querying a public blockchain explorer, wallets SHOULD connect to the explorer through Tor (or equivalent) and SHOULD avoid grouping queries in a manner that associates ephemeral addresses with each other. + +Previously-spendable funds will generally not be lost or become inaccessible after a recovery from a seed, but all information regarding previous outgoing payments will be lost. + +The metadata which a wallet must store regarding the state an identity consists of: + +# A list of every payment code to which the identity has sent a notification transaction. +## This list is lost if a wallet must be recovered from a seed. +## The recovered wallet MUST send notification transactions as if it was a newly-created wallet +# The index value corresponding to the next unused pubkey for each payment code on the previous list +## This value can be recovered by checking each ephemeral deposit address in sequence for transactions. +## Wallets MAY use a lookahead window capable of detecting gaps in the address sequence during this recovery operation. +# The index value of the next unused ephemeral payment code. +## Recovering all incoming funds associated with ephemeral payment codes with 100% certainty requires exhausting the entire 2<sup>32</sup> address space of potential ephemeral payment codes. +### In most cases, less than 100% certainty is acceptable as long as a fallback "deep scan" is available as an option to the user. +## The wallet checks the notification address for each ephemeral payment code for notification transactions in order to recover associated funds. +## Since most ephemeral payment codes will not receive a refund transaction wallets SHOULD use a large lookahead window for this recovery operation. +## The recovered value MUST be chosen as a number higher than any ephemeral payment code which has received a notification transaction. + +===Wallet Sharing=== + +Wallets using payment codes generally should not be shared across multiple devices, given the need to synchronize metadata between each instance. + +If wallets are shared between devices without a synchronization mechanism, undesirable address reuse can occur. + +Wallets may perform an OPTIONAL check for existing transactions to an ephemeral deposit addresses prior to sending a transaction by checking a local copy of the blockchain or querying a public blockchain explorer via Tor or equivalent. + +===Alternate Notification Methods=== + +In order to ensure that no funds will be lost in the event the recipient must recover their wallet from a seed, the sender MUST send a notification transaction the first time the sender interacts with a particular recipient. + +A recipient MAY choose to designate alternate notification methods which the sender may use in addition to a notification transaction. + +If the recipient specifies an alternate notification method, a compliant implementation MAY refrain from continually monitoring the notification address and SHOULD check the notification address periodically to detect payments sent by users who can not employ the alternate method. + +A recipient specifies their preference for alternate notification by setting the appropriate bits in the feature byte of their payment code. + +===Bitmessage Notification=== + +A recipient prefers to receive notifications via Bitmessage indiates this preference by: + +* Setting bit 0 of the features byte to 1 +* Appending a byte containing the desired Bitmessage address version to the payment code at byte 67 +* Appending a byte containing the desired Bitmessage stream number to the payment code at byte 68 + +The sender uses this information to construct a valid notification Bitmessage address: + +# Use the recipient's 0<sup>th</sup> public key as the Bitmessage signing key: <pre>B</pre> +# Initialize a counter at 1: <pre>n</pre> +# Derive a candidate encryption key: <pre>B' = B + nG</pre> +# If the combination of B and B` do not form a valid Bitmessage address, increment n by one and try again +# Use the address version, signing key, encryption key, and stream number to construct a Bitmessage address per the Bitmessage protocol + +The sender transmits their payment code in base58 form to the calculated Bitmessage address. + +In order to use Bitmessage notification, the recipient must have a Bitmessage client which listens at the address which the senders will derive and is capable of relaying received payment codes to the Bitcoin wallet. + +==Reference== + +* [[bip-0032.mediawiki|BIP32 - Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets]] +* [[bip-0043.mediawiki|BIP43 - Purpose Field for Deterministic Wallets]] +* [[bip-0044.mediawiki|BIP44 - Multi-Account Hierarchy for Deterministic Wallets]] +* [[https://github.com/petertodd/dust-b-gone|dust-b-gone]] +* [[https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Base58Check_encoding|Base58Check encoding]] +* [[https://bitmessage.org/bitmessage.pdf|Bitmessage]] |