diff options
| author | Andy Chase <asperous2@gmail.com> | 2015-12-04 02:48:43 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andy Chase <asperous2@gmail.com> | 2015-12-04 02:48:43 -0800 |
| commit | 6f0c335b184f7dce4ac2caee87553f3b8df26112 (patch) | |
| tree | b0d46a91835d0131c98c5132c57560eb9f9668b8 /bip-0009 | |
| parent | b1ae7bad0f5956599413f24a7990641de447a558 (diff) | |
| download | bips-6f0c335b184f7dce4ac2caee87553f3b8df26112.tar.xz | |
BIP-0001 Should be labeled as "Process" Type
Previously BIP-0001 listed in its header preamble that is was a "Standards Track"
type proposal. This conflicts with both its own definition of "Standards Track"
proposal as well as the type listed in PEP-0001 of which BIP-0001 is based on.
Defitions of each type of proposal:
A Standards Track BIP describes any change that affects most or all Bitcoin implementations.
An Informational BIP describes a Bitcoin design issue, or provides general guidelines or information to the Bitcoin community, but does not propose a new feature.
A Process BIP describes a process surrounding Bitcoin, or proposes a change to (or an event in) a process.
Specifically: "Any meta-BIP is also considered a Process BIP."
Based on these definitions BIP-0001 should have always been labeled as a "Process" BIP and this patch corrects this.
Diffstat (limited to 'bip-0009')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions