summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMatt Corallo <git@bluematt.me>2024-07-28 17:30:57 +0000
committerMatt Corallo <git@bluematt.me>2024-07-31 13:45:09 +0000
commiteeaf21d882df2cda2b0434918f2f15a62db79590 (patch)
treeb2bde3737ce3a8f05cbcd32ff7e59d2d56d7d760
parent90312d2d67c0fea7497dad7d4a8b416df8345602 (diff)
Consistently refer to them as "human-readable names", not addresses
It seems confusing to call BIP 353 names "addresses", and most of the BIP refers to them as "names", but a few "human-readable addresses" snuck in in a recent change, which are fixed here.
-rw-r--r--bip-0353.mediawiki4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/bip-0353.mediawiki b/bip-0353.mediawiki
index 9deba50..43e424f 100644
--- a/bip-0353.mediawiki
+++ b/bip-0353.mediawiki
@@ -70,9 +70,9 @@ Payment instructions which do contain on-chain addresses which will be re-used S
=== Display ===
-When displaying a verified human-readable address, wallets SHOULD prefix it with ₿, i.e. ₿`user`@`domain`. They SHOULD parse recipient information in both `user`@`domain` and ₿`user`@`domain` forms and resolve such entry into recipient information using the above record. For the avoidance of doubt, the ₿ is *not* included in the DNS label which is resolved.
+When displaying a verified human-readable name, wallets SHOULD prefix it with ₿, i.e. ₿`user`@`domain`. They SHOULD parse recipient information in both `user`@`domain` and ₿`user`@`domain` forms and resolve such an entry into recipient information using the above record. For the avoidance of doubt, the ₿ is *not* included in the DNS label which is resolved.
-Wallets providing the ability for users to "copy" their address information SHOULD copy the underlying URI directly, rather than the human-readable address. This avoids an additional DNS lookup by the application in which it is pasted. Wallets that nevertheless provide users the ability to copy their human-readable address, MUST include the ₿ prefix (i.e. copy it in the form ₿`user`@`domain`).
+Wallets providing the ability for users to "copy" their address information SHOULD copy the underlying URI directly, rather than the human-readable name. This avoids an additional DNS lookup by the application in which it is pasted. Wallets that nevertheless provide users the ability to copy their human-readable name, MUST include the ₿ prefix (i.e. copy it in the form ₿`user`@`domain`).
Wallets accepting payment information from external devices (e.g. hardware wallets) SHOULD accept RFC 9102-formatted proofs (as a series of unsorted `AuthenticationChain` records) and, if verification succeeds, SHOULD display the recipient in the form ₿`user`@`domain`.