summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJon Atack <jon@atack.com>2024-10-08 10:48:57 -0600
committerJon Atack <jon@atack.com>2024-10-08 11:03:37 -0600
commitca280b9762f7ce8db2c8db1149fcae0270c27cdd (patch)
treed84eb207af64b06332aa5c1014261ca6bdf21851
parent83a1afd9859848628645c7fa200beb0dc0aea4f5 (diff)
BIP2: replace legacy http links with https
-rw-r--r--bip-0002.mediawiki16
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/bip-0002.mediawiki b/bip-0002.mediawiki
index 4bdc23b..291a0b1 100644
--- a/bip-0002.mediawiki
+++ b/bip-0002.mediawiki
@@ -362,28 +362,28 @@ In this case, only the acceptable license(s) should be listed in the License and
* BSD-2-Clause: [https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause OSI-approved BSD 2-clause license]
* BSD-3-Clause: [https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause OSI-approved BSD 3-clause license]
* CC0-1.0: [https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal]
-* GNU-All-Permissive: [http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/License-Notices-for-Other-Files.html GNU All-Permissive License]
+* GNU-All-Permissive: [https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/License-Notices-for-Other-Files.html GNU All-Permissive License]
In addition, it is recommended that literal code included in the BIP be dual-licensed under the same license terms as the project it modifies. For example, literal code intended for Bitcoin Core would ideally be dual-licensed under the MIT license terms as well as one of the above with the rest of the BIP text.
====Not recommended, but acceptable licenses====
-* Apache-2.0: [http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Apache License, version 2.0]
-* BSL-1.0: [http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt Boost Software License, version 1.0]
+* Apache-2.0: [https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Apache License, version 2.0]
+* BSL-1.0: [https://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt Boost Software License, version 1.0]
* CC-BY-4.0: [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International]
* CC-BY-SA-4.0: [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International]
* MIT: [https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT Expat/MIT/X11 license]
-* AGPL-3.0+: [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.en.html GNU Affero General Public License (AGPL), version 3 or newer]
-* FDL-1.3: [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.en.html GNU Free Documentation License, version 1.3]
-* GPL-2.0+: [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.en.html GNU General Public License (GPL), version 2 or newer]
-* LGPL-2.1+: [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.1.en.html GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), version 2.1 or newer]
+* AGPL-3.0+: [https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.en.html GNU Affero General Public License (AGPL), version 3 or newer]
+* FDL-1.3: [https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.en.html GNU Free Documentation License, version 1.3]
+* GPL-2.0+: [https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.en.html GNU General Public License (GPL), version 2 or newer]
+* LGPL-2.1+: [https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.1.en.html GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), version 2.1 or newer]
====Not acceptable licenses====
All licenses not explicitly included in the above lists are not acceptable terms for a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal unless a later BIP extends this one to add them.
However, BIPs predating the acceptance of this BIP were allowed under other terms, and should use these abbreviation when no other license is granted:
-* OPL: [http://opencontent.org/openpub/ Open Publication License, version 1.0]
+* OPL: [https://opencontent.org/openpub/ Open Publication License, version 1.0]
* PD: Released into the public domain
===Rationale===