summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authornicolas.dorier <nicolas.dorier@gmail.com>2020-05-28 08:39:49 +0900
committernicolas.dorier <nicolas.dorier@gmail.com>2020-05-28 08:39:49 +0900
commit633f94d0056dd3aec8ed89343fcfa37f8905e117 (patch)
treeda7d8877363793846729433ff9f6486e419f2fd4
parent387d5e1b12eaf06f4d454e1e53e3465c25a9fa53 (diff)
downloadbips-633f94d0056dd3aec8ed89343fcfa37f8905e117.tar.xz
This BIP replace 79
-rw-r--r--bip-xxxx.mediawiki2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/bip-xxxx.mediawiki b/bip-xxxx.mediawiki
index fb14013..7334e30 100644
--- a/bip-xxxx.mediawiki
+++ b/bip-xxxx.mediawiki
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
Layer: Applications
Title: A Simple Payjoin Proposal
Author: Nicolas Dorier <nicolas.dorier@gmail.com>
+ Replaces: 79
Comments-Summary: No comments yet.
Comments-URI: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/wiki/Comments:BIP-X
Status: Draft
@@ -52,7 +53,6 @@ Another implementation proposal has been written: [[https://github.com/bitcoin/b
We decided to deviate from it for several reasons:
* It was not using PSBT, so if the receiver wanted to bump the fee, they would need the full UTXO set.
* The receiver was responsible to pay the additional fee, not the sender.
-* It was requiring at least one input to be contributed by the receiver.
* Inability to change the payment output to match scriptPubKey type.
* Lack of basic versioning negotiation if the protocol evolves.
* No standardization of error condition for proper feedback to the sender.