aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/node_modules/highlight.js/docs/line-numbers.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'node_modules/highlight.js/docs/line-numbers.rst')
-rw-r--r--node_modules/highlight.js/docs/line-numbers.rst39
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/node_modules/highlight.js/docs/line-numbers.rst b/node_modules/highlight.js/docs/line-numbers.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..674542d4e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/node_modules/highlight.js/docs/line-numbers.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+Line numbers
+============
+
+Highlight.js' notable lack of line numbers support is not an oversight but a
+feature. Following is the explanation of this policy from the current project
+maintainer (hey guys!):
+
+ One of the defining design principles for highlight.js from the start was
+ simplicity. Not the simplicity of code (in fact, it's quite complex) but
+ the simplicity of usage and of the actual look of highlighted snippets on
+ HTML pages. Many highlighters, in my opinion, are overdoing it with such
+ things as separate colors for every single type of lexemes, striped
+ backgrounds, fancy buttons around code blocks and — yes — line numbers.
+ The more fancy stuff resides around the code the more it distracts a
+ reader from understanding it.
+
+ This is why it's not a straightforward decision: this new feature will not
+ just make highlight.js better, it might actually make it worse simply by
+ making it look more bloated in blog posts around the Internet. This is why
+ I'm asking people to show that it's worth it.
+
+ The only real use-case that ever was brought up in support of line numbers
+ is referencing code from the descriptive text around it. On my own blog I
+ was always solving this either with comments within the code itself or by
+ breaking the larger snippets into smaller ones and describing each small
+ part separately. I'm not saying that my solution is better. But I don't
+ see how line numbers are better either. And the only way to show that they
+ are better is to set up some usability research on the subject. I doubt
+ anyone would bother to do it.
+
+ Then there's maintenance. So far the core code of highlight.js is
+ maintained by only one person — yours truly. Inclusion of any new code in
+ highlight.js means that from that moment I will have to fix bugs in it,
+ improve it further, make it work together with the rest of the code,
+ defend its design. And I don't want to do all this for the feature that I
+ consider "evil" and probably will never use myself.
+
+This position is `subject to discuss <http://groups.google.com/group/highlightjs>`_.
+Also it doesn't stop anyone from forking the code and maintaining line-numbers implementation separately.