aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/contrib/articles/ui/ui.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'contrib/articles/ui/ui.tex')
-rw-r--r--contrib/articles/ui/ui.tex6
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/contrib/articles/ui/ui.tex b/contrib/articles/ui/ui.tex
index ccf36cdf9..37cd8b076 100644
--- a/contrib/articles/ui/ui.tex
+++ b/contrib/articles/ui/ui.tex
@@ -1016,7 +1016,7 @@ it has the following key advantages:
// ...
let refundPermissions = /* ... */;
taler.acceptRefunds(refundPermissions, (err) => {
- alert("An error occured while attempting a refund");
+ alert("An error occurred while attempting a refund");
});
</script>
\end{lstlisting}
@@ -1077,7 +1077,7 @@ anonymous payment system.
%a refund operation cannot be considered anonymous anymore because a
%merchant, and possibly the exchange, has now seen them and could
%link them that previous transaction. At best, these tainted coins
-%are only pseudononymous, similar to Bitcoin accounts.
+%are only pseudonymous, similar to Bitcoin accounts.
%
%To maintain anonymity, a Taler wallet automatically performs a
%{\em refresh} operation with the mint API to both replace tainted
@@ -1433,7 +1433,7 @@ situation.
Finally, attempts to address the scalability hudles of Bitcoin using
side-chains or schemes like BOLT introduce semi-centralized
-intermediaries, not wholey unlike Taler's use of exchanges. Compared
+intermediaries, not wholly unlike Taler's use of exchanges. Compared
to BOLT, we would expect a Taler exchange operating in BTC to offer
stronger security to all parties and stronger anonymity to customers,
as well as being vastly cheaper to operate.