aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/articles
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJeff Burdges <burdges@gnunet.org>2016-08-12 01:45:46 +0200
committerJeff Burdges <burdges@gnunet.org>2016-08-12 01:45:46 +0200
commitcb5e1f3331b9bb034ce333b2c197090df5b259c2 (patch)
tree33cb9f29acf8390aafa6da15ca12fc31aa513d44 /articles
parentec125f24b8fabe01c24ca2a0e2c73b03f030b120 (diff)
downloadwallet-core-cb5e1f3331b9bb034ce333b2c197090df5b259c2.tar.xz
Related work comments on BOLT
Diffstat (limited to 'articles')
-rw-r--r--articles/ui/btc.bib9
-rw-r--r--articles/ui/ui.tex19
2 files changed, 26 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/articles/ui/btc.bib b/articles/ui/btc.bib
index b28be2c41..556a17b50 100644
--- a/articles/ui/btc.bib
+++ b/articles/ui/btc.bib
@@ -180,3 +180,12 @@
year={2013},
organization={IEEE}
}
+
+@misc{BOLT,
+ author = {Matthew Green and Ian Miers},
+ title = {Bolt: Anonymous Payment Channels for Decentralized Currencies},
+ howpublished = {Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2016/701},
+ year = {2016},
+ note = {\url{http://eprint.iacr.org/2016/701}},
+}
+
diff --git a/articles/ui/ui.tex b/articles/ui/ui.tex
index 765efcf02..41eaca4d4 100644
--- a/articles/ui/ui.tex
+++ b/articles/ui/ui.tex
@@ -340,8 +340,23 @@ development of new protocols with better privacy protections.
Zerocoin \cite{miers2013zerocoin} is such an extension of Bitcoin:
It affords protection against linkability of transactions,
but at non-trivial additional computational costs even for
-spending coins. This currently makes using Zerocoin unattractive for payments
-with mobile devices.
+spending coins. This currently makes using Zerocoin unattractive
+for payments, espcially with mobile devices.
+
+There are a variety of efforts to confront Bitcoin's scaling problems
+with off-blockchain techniques, like side-chains. % \cite{???}
+Amongst these, the Blind Off-chain Lightweight Transactions (BOLT)
+proposal \cite{BOLT} provides anonymity by routing off-blockchain
+transfers through bank-like intermetdiaries. Although interesting,
+there are numerous fragile seemingly aspects of the BOLT protocol,
+including aborts deanonymizing customers, intermetdiaries risking
+unlimited losses, and theft if a party fails to post a refute message.
+As BOLT requires semi-centralized intermetdiaries anyways,
+we expect a Taler exchange operating in BTC to offer stronger
+security to all parties and stronger anonymity to customers,
+as well as being vastly cheaper to operate and much more compatable
+with existing financial regulations.
+
Bitcoin's pseudononymity applies equally to both customers and
merchants, which makes Bitcoin amen\-able to tax evasion, money