diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | src/exchange-lib/test_exchange_api_twisted.c | 42 |
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/src/exchange-lib/test_exchange_api_twisted.c b/src/exchange-lib/test_exchange_api_twisted.c index 7d24fbc95..5cbe4b827 100644 --- a/src/exchange-lib/test_exchange_api_twisted.c +++ b/src/exchange-lib/test_exchange_api_twisted.c @@ -140,7 +140,12 @@ run (void *cls, struct TALER_TESTING_Interpreter *is) { - struct TALER_TESTING_Command commands[] = { + + /** + * This batch aims to trigger the 409 Conflict + * response from a refresh-reveal operation. + */ + struct TALER_TESTING_Command refresh_409_conflict[] = { CMD_TRANSFER_TO_EXCHANGE ("refresh-create-reserve", @@ -198,14 +203,12 @@ run (void *cls, "refresh-melt", MHD_HTTP_CONFLICT), - /* Next chunk, refund conflicts - - (contract hash missmatch [!], - original deposit does not exist V, - currency missmatch) V; - - 'refund_transaction()' has many of the relevant cases; - */ + TALER_TESTING_cmd_end () + + }; + + + struct TALER_TESTING_Command refund[] = { CMD_TRANSFER_TO_EXCHANGE ("create-reserve-r1", @@ -261,12 +264,9 @@ run (void *cls, "EUR:0.01", "deposit-refund-1"), - /* This deposit CMD is used to provide "good" traits - * to the next refund CMD, where 'good' means that the - * POST /refund will pass the signature verification, - * but the handler will then NOT judge the deposit as - * refundable - actually it won't be found since it will - * fail as double-spending attempt. */ + /* This next deposit CMD is only used to provide a + * good merchant signature to the next (failing) refund + * operations. */ TALER_TESTING_cmd_deposit ("deposit-refund-to-fail", @@ -307,6 +307,18 @@ run (void *cls, "deposit-refund-1"), TALER_TESTING_cmd_end () + + }; + + struct TALER_TESTING_Command commands[] = { + + TALER_TESTING_cmd_batch ("refresh-reveal-409-conflict", + refresh_409_conflict), + + TALER_TESTING_cmd_batch ("refund", + refund), + + TALER_TESTING_cmd_end () }; TALER_TESTING_run_with_fakebank (is, |