aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristian Grothoff <christian@grothoff.org>2016-10-25 14:20:27 +0200
committerChristian Grothoff <christian@grothoff.org>2016-10-25 14:20:27 +0200
commit8dfe55890983a34c4d965526fab0d83daf66bb56 (patch)
tree120279544412e106566d5194ae802129d89b903e
parente6267e61d5e80f81735769b81e6d2694303799e7 (diff)
remove duplication
-rw-r--r--doc/paper/taler.tex3
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/doc/paper/taler.tex b/doc/paper/taler.tex
index b8d047dd1..3ee7e5b51 100644
--- a/doc/paper/taler.tex
+++ b/doc/paper/taler.tex
@@ -404,8 +404,7 @@ could spend the associated funds. Assuming the payment system has
effective double-spending detection, this means that either entity has
to constantly fear that the funds might no longer be available to it.
It follows that sharing coins by copying a private key implies mutual
-trust between the two parties, in which case we treat them as the same
-entity for taxability.
+trust between the two parties.
In Taler, making funds available by copying a private key and thus
sharing control is {\bf not} considered a {\em transaction} and thus