aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJeff Burdges <burdges@gnunet.org>2016-11-10 17:19:00 +0100
committerJeff Burdges <burdges@gnunet.org>2016-11-10 17:19:00 +0100
commitf0dd542b4b7d934731bf864c3721afab832e46a3 (patch)
tree79412d4b160b798dafb304b4cb051629cd0600c1
parent44ddaaca7fb1f16c804d31d5414960a07900d087 (diff)
Offline patmenr first paragraph
Requested by Christian, not sire if I heit what he wanted.
-rw-r--r--doc/paper/taler.tex17
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/doc/paper/taler.tex b/doc/paper/taler.tex
index 89c7e7e82..088ca25ef 100644
--- a/doc/paper/taler.tex
+++ b/doc/paper/taler.tex
@@ -1174,14 +1174,15 @@ deanonymize citizens.
\subsection{Offline Payments} \label{sec:offline}
-Chaum's original proposals for anonymous digital cash avoided the need
-for online interactions with the exchange to detect double spending by
-providing a means to deanonymize customers involved in
-double-spending. This is problematic as the exchange or the merchant
-still need out-of-band means to recover funds from the customer, which
-may be infeasible in practice. Furthermore, a customer may
-accidentally deanonymize himself, for example by double-spending a
-coin after restoring from backup.
+Anonymous digital cash schemes since Chaum were frequently designed
+to allow the merchant to be offline during the transaction,
+by providing a means to deanonymize customers involved in
+double-spending. We consider this problematic as either the
+exchange or the merchant still requires an out-of-band
+means to recover funds from the customer, an expensive and
+unreliable proposition. Worse, there are unacceptable risks that
+a customer may accidentally deanonymize herself, for example by
+double-spending a coin after restoring from backup.
\subsection{Merchant Tax Audits}