diff options
author | Mario Preksavec <mario@slackware.hr> | 2016-10-12 20:59:22 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Willy Sudiarto Raharjo <willysr@slackbuilds.org> | 2016-10-15 07:09:58 +0700 |
commit | b1a0ce4079053a6b08394e58b4d74d6ad1c015a9 (patch) | |
tree | a88d3dbc0525105178c38a777a9454c07d72bef1 | |
parent | 0fa1762f09458a557659f0688017b5ce9ad455d7 (diff) |
system/xen: Added XSA-190 security advisory patch.
Signed-off-by: Mario Preksavec <mario@slackware.hr>
-rw-r--r-- | system/xen/xen.SlackBuild | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | system/xen/xsa/xsa190.patch | 173 |
2 files changed, 174 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/system/xen/xen.SlackBuild b/system/xen/xen.SlackBuild index e84c2d74e8494..3e80785367954 100644 --- a/system/xen/xen.SlackBuild +++ b/system/xen/xen.SlackBuild @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ PRGNAM=xen VERSION=${VERSION:-4.7.0} -BUILD=${BUILD:-1} +BUILD=${BUILD:-2} TAG=${TAG:-_SBo} SEABIOS=${SEABIOS:-1.9.2} diff --git a/system/xen/xsa/xsa190.patch b/system/xen/xsa/xsa190.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..3c242e6cc2768 --- /dev/null +++ b/system/xen/xsa/xsa190.patch @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ +x86emul: honor guest CR0.TS and CR0.EM + +We must not emulate any instructions accessing respective registers +when either of these flags is set in the guest view of the register, or +else we may do so on data not belonging to the guest's current task. + +Being architecturally required behavior, the logic gets placed in the +instruction emulator instead of hvmemul_get_fpu(). It should be noted, +though, that hvmemul_get_fpu() being the only current handler for the +get_fpu() callback, we don't have an active problem with CR4: Both +CR4.OSFXSR and CR4.OSXSAVE get handled as necessary by that function. + +This is XSA-190. + +Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> +Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> +--- +v4: Only raise #NM on FWAIT when CR0.TS and CR0.MP are set. +v3: Correct which exception to raise upon set CR0.EM. +v2: Require the read_cr hook to be set, which then requires a change to + the test code too. +--- +The change to xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c isn't strictly needed for +fixing the security issue, but the patch would be rather incomplete +without. + +--- a/tools/tests/x86_emulator/test_x86_emulator.c ++++ b/tools/tests/x86_emulator/test_x86_emulator.c +@@ -158,6 +158,22 @@ static inline uint64_t xgetbv(uint32_t x + (ebx & (1U << 5)) != 0; \ + }) + ++static int read_cr( ++ unsigned int reg, ++ unsigned long *val, ++ struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt) ++{ ++ /* Fake just enough state for the emulator's _get_fpu() to be happy. */ ++ switch ( reg ) ++ { ++ case 0: ++ *val = 0x00000001; /* PE */ ++ return X86EMUL_OKAY; ++ } ++ ++ return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE; ++} ++ + int get_fpu( + void (*exception_callback)(void *, struct cpu_user_regs *), + void *exception_callback_arg, +@@ -189,6 +205,7 @@ static struct x86_emulate_ops emulops = + .write = write, + .cmpxchg = cmpxchg, + .cpuid = cpuid, ++ .read_cr = read_cr, + .get_fpu = get_fpu, + }; + +--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c ++++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c +@@ -1628,14 +1628,14 @@ static int hvmemul_get_fpu( + switch ( type ) + { + case X86EMUL_FPU_fpu: ++ case X86EMUL_FPU_wait: + break; + case X86EMUL_FPU_mmx: + if ( !cpu_has_mmx ) + return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE; + break; + case X86EMUL_FPU_xmm: +- if ( (curr->arch.hvm_vcpu.guest_cr[0] & X86_CR0_EM) || +- !(curr->arch.hvm_vcpu.guest_cr[4] & X86_CR4_OSFXSR) ) ++ if ( !(curr->arch.hvm_vcpu.guest_cr[4] & X86_CR4_OSFXSR) ) + return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE; + break; + case X86EMUL_FPU_ymm: +--- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c ++++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c +@@ -420,6 +420,9 @@ typedef union { + + /* Control register flags. */ + #define CR0_PE (1<<0) ++#define CR0_MP (1<<1) ++#define CR0_EM (1<<2) ++#define CR0_TS (1<<3) + #define CR4_TSD (1<<2) + + /* EFLAGS bit definitions. */ +@@ -447,6 +450,7 @@ typedef union { + #define EXC_OF 4 + #define EXC_BR 5 + #define EXC_UD 6 ++#define EXC_NM 7 + #define EXC_TS 10 + #define EXC_NP 11 + #define EXC_SS 12 +@@ -746,10 +750,45 @@ static void fpu_handle_exception(void *_ + regs->eip += fic->insn_bytes; + } + ++static int _get_fpu( ++ enum x86_emulate_fpu_type type, ++ struct fpu_insn_ctxt *fic, ++ struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, ++ const struct x86_emulate_ops *ops) ++{ ++ int rc; ++ ++ fic->exn_raised = 0; ++ ++ fail_if(!ops->get_fpu); ++ rc = ops->get_fpu(fpu_handle_exception, fic, type, ctxt); ++ ++ if ( rc == X86EMUL_OKAY ) ++ { ++ unsigned long cr0; ++ ++ fail_if(!ops->read_cr); ++ rc = ops->read_cr(0, &cr0, ctxt); ++ if ( rc != X86EMUL_OKAY ) ++ return rc; ++ if ( cr0 & CR0_EM ) ++ { ++ generate_exception_if(type == X86EMUL_FPU_fpu, EXC_NM, -1); ++ generate_exception_if(type == X86EMUL_FPU_mmx, EXC_UD, -1); ++ generate_exception_if(type == X86EMUL_FPU_xmm, EXC_UD, -1); ++ } ++ generate_exception_if((cr0 & CR0_TS) && ++ (type != X86EMUL_FPU_wait || (cr0 & CR0_MP)), ++ EXC_NM, -1); ++ } ++ ++ done: ++ return rc; ++} ++ + #define get_fpu(_type, _fic) \ +-do{ (_fic)->exn_raised = 0; \ +- fail_if(ops->get_fpu == NULL); \ +- rc = ops->get_fpu(fpu_handle_exception, _fic, _type, ctxt); \ ++do { \ ++ rc = _get_fpu(_type, _fic, ctxt, ops); \ + if ( rc ) goto done; \ + } while (0) + #define _put_fpu() \ +@@ -2879,8 +2918,14 @@ x86_emulate( + } + + case 0x9b: /* wait/fwait */ +- emulate_fpu_insn("fwait"); ++ { ++ struct fpu_insn_ctxt fic = { .insn_bytes = 1 }; ++ ++ get_fpu(X86EMUL_FPU_wait, &fic); ++ asm volatile ( "fwait" ::: "memory" ); ++ put_fpu(&fic); + break; ++ } + + case 0x9c: /* pushf */ + src.val = _regs.eflags; +--- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.h ++++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.h +@@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ struct __packed segment_register { + /* FPU sub-types which may be requested via ->get_fpu(). */ + enum x86_emulate_fpu_type { + X86EMUL_FPU_fpu, /* Standard FPU coprocessor instruction set */ ++ X86EMUL_FPU_wait, /* WAIT/FWAIT instruction */ + X86EMUL_FPU_mmx, /* MMX instruction set (%mm0-%mm7) */ + X86EMUL_FPU_xmm, /* SSE instruction set (%xmm0-%xmm7/15) */ + X86EMUL_FPU_ymm /* AVX/XOP instruction set (%ymm0-%ymm7/15) */ |