| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The exrl-trt* tests use two pre-initialized variables for the
results of the assembly code:
uint64_t r1 = 0xffffffffffffffffull;
uint64_t r2 = 0xffffffffffffffffull;
But then the assembly code copies over the full contents
of the register into the output variable, without taking
care of this pre-initialized values:
" lgr %[r1],%%r1\n"
" lgr %[r2],%%r2\n"
The code then finally compares the register contents to
a value that apparently depends on the pre-initialized values:
if (r2 != 0xffffffffffffffaaull) {
write(1, "bad r2\n", 7);
return 1;
}
This all works with GCC, since the 0xffffffffffffffff got into
the r2 register there by accident, but it fails completely with
Clang.
Let's fix this by declaring the r1 and r2 variables as proper
register variables instead, so the pre-initialized values get
correctly passed into the inline assembly code.
Message-Id: <20220301092431.1448419-1-thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
|
|
The current EXRL tests crash on real machines: we must not use r0 as a base
register for trt/trtr, otherwise the content gets ignored. Also, we must
not use r0 for exrl, otherwise it gets ignored.
Let's use the "a" constraint so we get a general purpose register != r0.
For op2, we can simply specify a memory operand directly via "Q" (Memory
reference without index register and with short displacement).
Fixes: ad8c851d2e77 ("target/s390x: add EX support for TRT and TRTR")
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210111163845.18148-5-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
|
|
Improves "b213c9f5: target/s390x: Implement TRTR" by introducing the
intermediate functions, which are compatible with dx_helper type.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Zbitskiy <pavel.zbitskiy@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20180821025104.19604-6-pavel.zbitskiy@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
|
