| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
For us, assertions are always enabled, but side-effect expressions
inside the argument to g_assert() are bad style anyway. Fix three
occurrences in IPMI related tests, which will silence some Coverity
nits.
Fixes: CID 1432322, CID 1432287, CID 1432291
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20210503165525.26221-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
|
|
Fix assert side-effect reported by Coverity:
/qemu/tests/qtest/ipmi-kcs-test.c: 84 in kcs_wait_obf()
83 while (IPMI_KCS_CMDREG_GET_OBF() == 0) {
>>> CID 1432368: Incorrect expression (ASSERT_SIDE_EFFECT)
>>> Argument "--count" of g_assert() has a side effect. The containing function might work differently in a non-debug build.
84 g_assert(--count != 0);
Reported-by: Coverity (CID 1432368)
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200902080801.160652-2-philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
|
|
The tests directory itself is pretty overcrowded, and it's hard to
see which test belongs to which test subsystem (unit, qtest, ...).
Let's move the qtests to a separate folder for more clarity.
Message-Id: <20191218103059.11729-6-thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
|
