Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Test 038 uses asynchronous I/O, resulting (potentially) in a different
output for every run (regarding the order of the I/O accesses). This can
be fixed by simply sorting the I/O access messages, since their order is
irrelevant anyway (for this asynchonous I/O).
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
The old code detected an overlapping allocation even when the
allocations didn't actually overlap, but were only adjacent.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
|
|
This one is a bit more interesting. The COW operation isn't performed
completely synchronously, and therefore dependencies must be handled
correctly when multiple requests write to the same unallocated cluster.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|