| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200317115459.31821-21-armbru@redhat.com>
|
|
In v4.1.0, we added feature flags just to struct types (commit
6a8c0b5102^..f3ed93d545), to satisfy an immediate need (commit
c9d4070991 "file-posix: Add dynamic-auto-read-only QAPI feature"). In
v4.2.0, we added them to commands (commit 23394b4c39 "qapi: Add
feature flags to commands") to satisfy another immediate need (commit
d76744e65e "qapi: Allow introspecting fix for savevm's cooperation
with blockdev").
Add them to the remaining definitions: enumeration types, union types,
alternate types, and events.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200317115459.31821-13-armbru@redhat.com>
|
|
Generate a reference "Arguments: the members of ...", just like we do
for commands since commit c2dd311cb7 "qapi2texi: Implement boxed
argument documentation".
No change to generated QMP documentation; we don't yet use boxed
events outside tests/.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191024110237.30963-7-armbru@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191024110237.30963-4-armbru@redhat.com>
|
|
Add negative tests doc-bad-boxed-command-arg and doc-bad-event-arg to
cover boxed and no arguments. They demonstrate insufficient doc
comment checking.
Update positive test doc-good to cover boxed event arguments. It
demonstrates the generated doc comment misses arguments.
These bugs will be fixed later in this series.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191024110237.30963-3-armbru@redhat.com>
|
|
Commit 8aa3a33e44 "tests/qapi-schema: Test for good feature lists in
structs" neglected to cover documentation comments, and the previous
commit followed its example. Make up for them.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191018081454.21369-5-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20181213123724.4866-21-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20181213123724.4866-20-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
|
|
Use a common function to generate the "If:..." line.
While at it, get rid of the existing \n\n (no idea why it was
there). Use a line-break in member description, this seems to look
slightly better in the plaintext version.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20181213123724.4866-19-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
|
|
The documentation is generated only once, and doesn't know C
pre-conditions. Add 'If:' sections for top-level entities.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20180703155648.11933-13-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
|
|
A negative test case crept into doc-good.json: invalid use of section
markup we currently fail to reject. Move this into its own
doc-bad-section.json.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20171002141341.24616-6-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
|
|
We have a number of negative tests, but we don't have systematic
positive coverage. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1490015515-25851-6-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
|
