Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
The tests directory itself is pretty overcrowded, and it's hard to
see which test belongs to which test subsystem (unit, qtest, ...).
Let's move the qtests to a separate folder for more clarity.
Message-Id: <20191218103059.11729-6-thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
|
|
We can easily test this, just like PCI. PHB unplug is not supported
on s390x and x86 ACPI.
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <155059673939.1466090.14354001937819612724.stgit@bahia.lab.toulouse-stg.fr.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
|
|
We can easily test this, just like PCI. On x86 ACPI, we need guest
interaction to make it work, so it is not that easy to test. We might
add tests for that later on.
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190218092202.26683-7-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
|
|
We can easily test this, just like PCI. On s390x, cpu unplug is not
supported. On x86 ACPI, cpu unplug requires guest interaction to work, so
it can't be tested that easily. We might add tests for ACPI later.
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190218092202.26683-6-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
|
|
As CCW unplugs are surprise removals without asking the guest first,
we can test this without any guest interaction.
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190218092202.26683-5-david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
|
|
The issue with testing asynchronous unplug requests it that they usually
require a running guest to handle the request. However, to test if
unplug of PCI devices works, we can apply a nice little trick on some
architectures:
On system reset, x86 ACPI, s390x and spapr will perform the unplug,
resulting in the device of interest to get deleted and a DEVICE_DELETED
event getting sent.
On s390x, we still get a warning
qemu-system-s390x: -device virtio-mouse-pci,id=dev0:
warning: Plugging a PCI/zPCI device without the 'zpci' CPU feature
enabled; the guest will not be able to see/use this device
This will be fixed soon, when we enable the zpci CPU feature always
(Conny already has a patch for this queued).
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190218092202.26683-4-david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
|