Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
v1->v2:
- fall back to uint64 rather than int
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Don't overwrite / leak previously set errors.
Make traversal cope with missing mandatory sub-structs.
Don't try to end a container that could not be started.
v1->v2:
- unchanged
v2->v3:
- instead of examining, assert that we never overwrite errors with
error_set()
- allow visitors to set a NULL struct pointer successfully, so traversal
of incomplete objects can continue
- check for a NULL "obj" before accessing "(*obj)->has_XXX" (this is not a
typo, "obj != NULL" implies "*obj != NULL" here)
- fix start_struct / end_struct balance for unions as well
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
The enum string is pointed to by 'enum_str' not 'name'. This bug
causes the error message to be:
{ "error": { "class": "InvalidParameter",
"desc": "Invalid parameter 'null'",
"data": { "name": "null" } } }
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amos Kong <akong@redhat.com>
|
|
This adds visitor interfaces for fixed-width integers types.
Implementing these in visitors is optional, otherwise we fall back to
visit_type_int() (int64_t) with some additional bounds checking to avoid
integer overflows for cases where the value fetched exceeds the bounds
of our target C type.
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
[LE: exclude negative values in uint*_t Visitor interfaces]
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
[AF: Merged fix by Laszlo]
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
|
|
Most visitors will use the same code for enum parsing. Move it to
the core.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
Base definitions/includes for Visiter interface used by generated
visiter/marshalling code.
Includes a GenericList type. Our lists require an embedded element.
Since these types are generated, if you want to use them in a different
type of data structure, there's no easy way to add another embedded
element. The solution is to have non-embedded lists and that what this is.
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@gmail.com>
|