Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
This patch aims to bring the following behavior:
1. We don't load bitmaps, when started in inactive mode. It's the case
of incoming migration. In this case we wait for bitmaps migration
through migration channel (if 'dirty-bitmaps' capability is enabled) or
for invalidation (to load bitmaps from the image).
2. We don't remove persistent bitmaps on inactivation. Instead, we only
remove bitmaps after storing. This is the only way to restore bitmaps,
if we decided to resume source after [failed] migration with
'dirty-bitmaps' capability enabled (which means, that bitmaps were not
stored).
3. We load bitmaps on open and any invalidation, it's ok for all cases:
- normal open
- migration target invalidation with dirty-bitmaps capability
(bitmaps are migrating through migration channel, the are not
stored, so they should have IN_USE flag set and will be skipped
when loading. However, it would fail if bitmaps are read-only[1])
- migration target invalidation without dirty-bitmaps capability
(normal load of the bitmaps, if migrated with shared storage)
- source invalidation with dirty-bitmaps capability
(skip because IN_USE)
- source invalidation without dirty-bitmaps capability
(bitmaps were dropped, reload them)
[1]: to accurately handle this, migration of read-only bitmaps is
explicitly forbidden in this patch.
New mechanism for not storing bitmaps when migrate with dirty-bitmaps
capability is introduced: migration filed in BdrvDirtyBitmap.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
|
|
Instead of both frozen and qmp_locked checks, wrap it into one check.
frozen implies the bitmap is split in two (for backup), and shouldn't
be modified. qmp_locked implies it's being used by another operation,
like being exported over NBD. In both cases it means we shouldn't allow
the user to modify it in any meaningful way.
Replace any usages where we check both frozen and qmp_locked with the
new check.
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20181002230218.13949-2-jsnow@redhat.com
[w/edits Suggested-By: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>]
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
|
|
Bitmap lock/unlock were added to bdrv_enable_dirty_bitmap in
8b1402ce80d, but some places were not updated correspondingly, which
leads to trying to take this lock twice, which is dead-lock. Fix this.
Actually, iotest 199 (about dirty bitmap postcopy migration) is broken
now, and this fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-id: 20180625165745.25259-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
|
|
dirty_bitmap_load_header return code is obtained but not handled. Fix
this.
Bug was introduced in b35ebdf076d697bc
"migration: add postcopy migration of dirty bitmaps" with the whole
function.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20180530112424.204835-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
|
|
When pulling in headers that are in the same directory as the C file (as
opposed to one in include/), we should use its relative path, without a
directory.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
|
|
Release buf on error path too.
Bug was introduced in b35ebdf076d697bc "migration: add postcopy
migration of dirty bitmaps" with the whole function.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20180427142002.21930-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
CC: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
|
|
Postcopy migration of dirty bitmaps. Only named dirty bitmaps are migrated.
If destination qemu is already containing a dirty bitmap with the same name
as a migrated bitmap (for the same node), then, if their granularities are
the same the migration will be done, otherwise the error will be generated.
If destination qemu doesn't contain such bitmap it will be created.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20180313180320.339796-12-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
[Changed '+' to '*' as per list discussion. --js]
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
|