| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This change checks elf_flags for EF_RISCV_RVE and if
present uses the RVE linux syscall ABI which uses t0
for the syscall number instead of a7.
Warn and exit if a non-RVE ABI binary is run on a
cpu with the RVE extension as it is incompatible.
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Cc: Sagar Karandikar <sagark@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: Bastian Koppelmann <kbastian@mail.uni-paderborn.de>
Cc: Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@wdc.com>
Co-authored-by: Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Clark <mjc@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Clark <mjc@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
|
|
The CPU main-loop routines for linux-user generally
call gdb_handlesig() when they're about to queue a
SIGTRAP signal. This is wrong, because queue_signal()
will cause us to pend a signal, and process_pending_signals()
will then call gdb_handlesig() itself. So the effect is that
we notify gdb of the SIGTRAP, and then if gdb says "OK,
continue with signal X" we will incorrectly notify
gdb of the signal X as well. We don't do this double-notify
for anything else, only SIGTRAP.
Remove this unnecessary and incorrect code from all
the targets except for nios2 (whose main loop is
doing something different and broken, and will be handled
in a separate patch).
This bug only manifests if the user responds to the reported
SIGTRAP using "signal SIGFOO" rather than "continue"; since
the latter is the overwhelmingly common thing to do after a
breakpoint most people won't have hit this.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20181019174958.26616-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
|
|
No code change, only move code from main.c to
riscv/cpu_loop.c.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Clark <mjc@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <20180411185651.21351-18-laurent@vivier.eu>
|
|
Create a cpu_loop-common.h for future use by
these new files and use it in the existing
main.c
Introduce target_cpu_copy_regs():
declare the function in cpu_loop-common.h
and an empty function for each target,
to move all the cpu_loop prologues to this function.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20180411185651.21351-2-laurent@vivier.eu>
|
