| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
A number of headers neglect to include everything they need. They
compile only if the headers they need are already included from
elsewhere. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20221222120813.727830-3-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
|
The basic SGX did not enable numa for SGX EPC sections, which
result in all EPC sections located in numa node 0. This patch
enable SGX numa function in the guest and the EPC section can
work with RAM as one numa node.
The Guest kernel related log:
[ 0.009981] ACPI: SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x180000000-0x183ffffff]
[ 0.009982] ACPI: SRAT: Node 1 PXM 1 [mem 0x184000000-0x185bfffff]
The SRAT table can normally show SGX EPC sections menory info in different
numa nodes.
The SGX EPC numa related command:
......
-m 4G,maxmem=20G \
-smp sockets=2,cores=2 \
-cpu host,+sgx-provisionkey \
-object memory-backend-ram,size=2G,host-nodes=0,policy=bind,id=node0 \
-object memory-backend-epc,id=mem0,size=64M,prealloc=on,host-nodes=0,policy=bind \
-numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-1,memdev=node0 \
-object memory-backend-ram,size=2G,host-nodes=1,policy=bind,id=node1 \
-object memory-backend-epc,id=mem1,size=28M,prealloc=on,host-nodes=1,policy=bind \
-numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=2-3,memdev=node1 \
-M sgx-epc.0.memdev=mem0,sgx-epc.0.node=0,sgx-epc.1.memdev=mem1,sgx-epc.1.node=1 \
......
Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20211101162009.62161-2-yang.zhong@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20211007175612.496366-3-philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
Add helpers to detect if SGX EPC exists above 4g, and if so, where SGX
EPC above 4g ends. Use the helpers to adjust the device memory range
if SGX EPC exists above 4g.
For multiple virtual EPC sections, we just put them together physically
contiguous for the simplicity because we don't support EPC NUMA affinity
now. Once the SGX EPC NUMA support in the kernel SGX driver, we will
support this in the future.
Note that SGX EPC is currently hardcoded to reside above 4g.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20210719112136.57018-18-yang.zhong@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
Expose SGX to the guest if and only if KVM is enabled and supports
virtualization of SGX. While the majority of ENCLS can be emulated to
some degree, because SGX uses a hardware-based root of trust, the
attestation aspects of SGX cannot be emulated in software, i.e.
ultimately emulation will fail as software cannot generate a valid
quote/report. The complexity of partially emulating SGX in Qemu far
outweighs the value added, e.g. an SGX specific simulator for userspace
applications can emulate SGX for development and testing purposes.
Note, access to the PROVISIONKEY is not yet advertised to the guest as
KVM blocks access to the PROVISIONKEY by default and requires userspace
to provide additional credentials (via ioctl()) to expose PROVISIONKEY.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20210719112136.57018-13-yang.zhong@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
Because SGX EPC is enumerated through CPUID, EPC "devices" need to be
realized prior to realizing the vCPUs themselves, i.e. long before
generic devices are parsed and realized. From a virtualization
perspective, the CPUID aspect also means that EPC sections cannot be
hotplugged without paravirtualizing the guest kernel (hardware does
not support hotplugging as EPC sections must be locked down during
pre-boot to provide EPC's security properties).
So even though EPC sections could be realized through the generic
-devices command, they need to be created much earlier for them to
actually be usable by the guest. Place all EPC sections in a
contiguous block, somewhat arbitrarily starting after RAM above 4g.
Ensuring EPC is in a contiguous region simplifies calculations, e.g.
device memory base, PCI hole, etc..., allows dynamic calculation of the
total EPC size, e.g. exposing EPC to guests does not require -maxmem,
and last but not least allows all of EPC to be enumerated in a single
ACPI entry, which is expected by some kernels, e.g. Windows 7 and 8.
The new compound properties command for sgx like below:
......
-object memory-backend-epc,id=mem1,size=28M,prealloc=on \
-object memory-backend-epc,id=mem2,size=10M \
-M sgx-epc.0.memdev=mem1,sgx-epc.1.memdev=mem2
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20210719112136.57018-6-yang.zhong@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
SGX EPC is enumerated through CPUID, i.e. EPC "devices" need to be
realized prior to realizing the vCPUs themselves, which occurs long
before generic devices are parsed and realized. Because of this,
do not allow 'sgx-epc' devices to be instantiated after vCPUS have
been created.
The 'sgx-epc' device is essentially a placholder at this time, it will
be fully implemented in a future patch along with a dedicated command
to create 'sgx-epc' devices.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20210719112136.57018-5-yang.zhong@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
