| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The introduction of the graph lock is causing blk_get_geometry, a hot function
used in the I/O path, to create a coroutine. However, the only part that really
needs to run in coroutine context is the call to bdrv_co_refresh_total_sectors,
which in turn only happens in the rare case of host CD-ROM devices.
So, write by hand the three wrappers on the path from blk_co_get_geometry to
bdrv_co_refresh_total_sectors, so that the coroutine wrapper is only created
if bdrv_nb_sectors actually calls bdrv_refresh_total_sectors.
Reported-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230407153303.391121-9-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
bdrv_co_get_geometry is only used in blk_co_get_geometry. Inline it in
there, to reduce the number of wrappers for bs->total_sectors.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230407153303.391121-7-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
blk_get_geometry() eventually calls bdrv_nb_sectors(), which is a
co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock. This means that when it is called from
coroutine context, it already assume to have the graph locked.
However, virtio_blk_sect_range_ok() in block/export/virtio-blk-handler.c
(used by vhost-user-blk and VDUSE exports) runs in a coroutine, but
doesn't take the graph lock - blk_*() functions are generally expected
to do that internally. This causes an assertion failure when accessing
an export for the first time if it runs in an iothread.
This is an example of the crash:
$ ./storage-daemon/qemu-storage-daemon --object iothread,id=th0 --blockdev file,filename=/home/kwolf/images/hd.img,node-name=disk --export vhost-user-blk,addr.type=unix,addr.path=/tmp/vhost.sock,node-name=disk,id=exp0,iothread=th0
qemu-storage-daemon: ../block/graph-lock.c:268: void assert_bdrv_graph_readable(void): Assertion `qemu_in_main_thread() || reader_count()' failed.
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007ffff6eafe5c in __pthread_kill_implementation () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x00007ffff6e5fa76 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#2 0x00007ffff6e497fc in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#3 0x00007ffff6e4971b in __assert_fail_base.cold () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#4 0x00007ffff6e58656 in __assert_fail () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#5 0x00005555556337a3 in assert_bdrv_graph_readable () at ../block/graph-lock.c:268
#6 0x00005555555fd5a2 in bdrv_co_nb_sectors (bs=0x5555564c5ef0) at ../block.c:5847
#7 0x00005555555ee949 in bdrv_nb_sectors (bs=0x5555564c5ef0) at block/block-gen.c:256
#8 0x00005555555fd6b9 in bdrv_get_geometry (bs=0x5555564c5ef0, nb_sectors_ptr=0x7fffef7fedd0) at ../block.c:5884
#9 0x000055555562ad6d in blk_get_geometry (blk=0x5555564cb200, nb_sectors_ptr=0x7fffef7fedd0) at ../block/block-backend.c:1624
#10 0x00005555555ddb74 in virtio_blk_sect_range_ok (blk=0x5555564cb200, block_size=512, sector=0, size=512) at ../block/export/virtio-blk-handler.c:44
#11 0x00005555555dd80d in virtio_blk_process_req (handler=0x5555564cbb98, in_iov=0x7fffe8003830, out_iov=0x7fffe8003860, in_num=1, out_num=0) at ../block/export/virtio-blk-handler.c:189
#12 0x00005555555dd546 in vu_blk_virtio_process_req (opaque=0x7fffe8003800) at ../block/export/vhost-user-blk-server.c:66
#13 0x00005555557bf4a1 in coroutine_trampoline (i0=-402635264, i1=32767) at ../util/coroutine-ucontext.c:177
#14 0x00007ffff6e75c20 in ?? () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#15 0x00007fffefffa870 in ?? ()
#16 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
Fix this by creating a new blk_co_get_geometry() that takes the lock,
and changing blk_get_geometry() to be a co_wrapper_mixed around it.
To make the resulting code cleaner, virtio-blk-handler.c can directly
call the coroutine version now (though that wouldn't be necessary for
fixing the bug, taking the lock in blk_co_get_geometry() is what fixes
it).
Fixes: 8ab8140a04cf771d63e9754d6ba6c1e676bfe507
Reported-by: Lukáš Doktor <ldoktor@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230327113959.60071-1-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_refresh_total_sectors() need to hold a reader lock for the
graph.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-24-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_*_dirty_bitmap() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-23-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_delete_file() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-22-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_eject() and bdrv_co_lock_medium() need to hold a reader lock for
the graph.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-20-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_is_inserted() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
blk_is_inserted() is done as a co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock (unlike most
other blk_* functions) because it is called a lot from other blk_co_*()
functions that already hold the lock. These calls go through
blk_is_available(), which becomes a co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock, too,
for the same reason.
Functions that run in a coroutine and can call bdrv_co_is_available()
directly are changed to do so, which results in better TSA coverage.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-19-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_io_plug() and bdrv_co_io_unplug() need to hold a reader lock for
the graph.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-18-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_copy_range() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-15-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pwrite_sync() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-13-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-10-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pdiscard() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-9-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_flush() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-8-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_ioctl() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-6-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_block_status() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-5-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_truncate() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-4-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
It is never called outside of block.c.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
bdrv_debug_event() is categorized as an I/O function, and it currently
doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph rdlock since
it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only possible in a
coroutine.
Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper_mixed to move the actual function
into a coroutine where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-14-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
bdrv_lock_medium() is categorized as an I/O function, and it currently
doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph rdlock since
it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only possible in a
coroutine.
The only caller of this function is blk_lock_medium(). Therefore make
blk_lock_medium() a co_wrapper, so that it always creates a new
coroutine, and then make bdrv_lock_medium() a coroutine_fn where the
lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-13-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
bdrv_eject() is categorized as an I/O function, and it currently
doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph rdlock since
it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only possible in a
coroutine.
The only caller of this function is blk_eject(). Therefore make
blk_eject() a co_wrapper, so that it always creates a new coroutine, and
then make bdrv_eject() coroutine_fn where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-12-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
bdrv_get_info() is categorized as an I/O function, and it currently
doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph rdlock since
it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only possible in a
coroutine.
Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper to move the actual function into a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-11-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
bdrv_get_allocated_file_size() is categorized as an I/O function, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph
rdlock since it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only
possible in a coroutine.
Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper to move the actual function into a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-10-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
BlockDriver->bdrv_getlength is categorized as IO callback, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph
rdlock since the callback traverses the block nodes graph, which however
is only possible in a coroutine.
Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper to move the actual function into a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.
Because now this function creates a new coroutine and polls, we need to
take the AioContext lock where it is missing, for the only reason that
internally co_wrapper calls AIO_WAIT_WHILE and it expects to release the
AioContext lock.
This is especially messy when a co_wrapper creates a coroutine and polls
in bdrv_open_driver, because this function has so many callers in so
many context that it can easily lead to deadlocks. Therefore the new
rule for bdrv_open_driver is that the caller must always hold the
AioContext lock of the given bs (except if it is a coroutine), because
the function calls bdrv_refresh_total_sectors() which is now a
co_wrapper.
Once the rwlock is ultimated and placed in every place it needs to be,
we will poll using AIO_WAIT_WHILE_UNLOCKED and remove the AioContext
lock.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-7-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
bdrv_is_inserted() is categorized as an I/O function, and it currently
doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph rdlock since
it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only possible in a
coroutine.
Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper to move the actual function into a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.
At the same time, add also blk_is_inserted as co_wrapper_mixed, since it
is called in both coroutine and non-coroutine contexts.
Because now this function creates a new coroutine and polls, we need to
take the AioContext lock where it is missing, for the only reason that
internally c_w_mixed_bdrv_rdlock calls AIO_WAIT_WHILE and it expects to
release the AioContext lock. Once the rwlock is ultimated and placed in
every place it needs to be, we will poll using AIO_WAIT_WHILE_UNLOCKED
and remove the AioContext lock.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-5-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
BlockDriver->bdrv_io_unplug is categorized as IO callback, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph
rdlock since the callback traverses the block nodes graph, which however
is only possible in a coroutine.
The only caller of this function is blk_io_unplug(), therefore make
blk_io_unplug() a co_wrapper, so that we're always running in a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-4-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
BlockDriver->bdrv_io_plug is categorized as IO callback, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph
rdlock since the callback traverses the block nodes graph, which however
is only possible in a coroutine.
The only caller of this function is blk_io_plug(), therefore make
blk_io_plug() a co_wrapper, so that we're always running in a coroutine
where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-3-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
It has only one caller---inline it and remove the function.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221215130225.476477-2-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
We have two inclusion loops:
block/block.h
-> block/block-global-state.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h
block/block.h
-> block/block-io.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h
I believe these go back to Emanuele's reorganization of the block API,
merged a few months ago in commit d7e2fe4aac8.
Fortunately, breaking them is merely a matter of deleting unnecessary
includes from headers, and adding them back in places where they are
now missing.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221221133551.3967339-2-armbru@redhat.com>
|
|
Take the rdlock already, before we add the assertions.
All these functions either read the graph recursively, or call
BlockDriver callbacks that will eventually need to be protected by the
graph rdlock.
Do it now to all functions together, because many of these recursively
call each other.
For example, bdrv_co_truncate calls BlockDriver->bdrv_co_truncate, and
some driver callbacks implement their own .bdrv_co_truncate by calling
bdrv_flush inside. So if bdrv_flush asserts but bdrv_truncate does not
take the rdlock yet, the assertion will always fail.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221207131838.239125-18-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
bdrv_can_store_new_dirty_bitmap and bdrv_remove_persistent_dirty_bitmap
check if they are running in a coroutine, directly calling the
coroutine callback if it's the case.
Except that no coroutine calls such functions, therefore that check
can be removed, and function creation can be offloaded to
c_w.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-15-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
In preparation to the incoming new function specifiers,
rename g_c_w with a more meaningful name and document it.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-10-eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
bdrv_common_block_status_above callers
bdrv_common_block_status_above() is a g_c_w, and it is being called by
many "wrapper" functions like bdrv_is_allocated(),
bdrv_is_allocated_above() and bdrv_block_status_above().
Because we want to eventually split the coroutine from non-coroutine
case in g_c_w, create duplicate wrappers that take care of directly
calling the same coroutine functions called in the g_c_w.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-2-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
All callers of bdrv_parent_drained_begin_single() pass poll=false now,
so we don't need the parameter any more.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221118174110.55183-16-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
In order to make sure that bdrv_replace_child_noperm() doesn't have to
poll any more, get rid of the bdrv_parent_drained_begin_single() call.
This is possible now because we can require that the parent is already
drained through the child in question when the function is called and we
don't call the parent drain callbacks more than once.
The additional drain calls needed in callers cause the test case to run
its code in the drain handler too early (bdrv_attach_child() drains
now), so modify it to only enable the code after the test setup has
completed.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221118174110.55183-15-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
ignore_bds_parents is now ignored during drain_begin and drain_end, so
we can just remove it there. It is still a valid optimisation for
drain_all in bdrv_drained_poll(), so leave it around there.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221118174110.55183-13-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
Subtree drains are not used any more. Remove them.
After this, BdrvChildClass.attach/detach() don't poll any more.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221118174110.55183-11-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
drained_end_counter is unused now, nobody changes its value any more. It
can be removed.
In cases where we had two almost identical functions that only differed
in whether the caller passes drained_end_counter, or whether they would
poll for a local drained_end_counter to reach 0, these become a single
function.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221118174110.55183-5-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
We want to use bdrv_child_get_parent_aio_context() from
bdrv_parent_drained_{begin,end}_single(), both of which are "I/O or GS"
functions.
Prior to 3ed4f708fe1, all the implementations were I/O code anyway.
3ed4f708fe1 has put block jobs' AioContext field under the job mutex, so
to make child_job_get_parent_aio_context() work in an I/O context, we
need to take that lock there.
Furthermore, blk_root_get_parent_aio_context() is not marked as
anything, but is safe to run in an I/O context, so mark it that way now.
(blk_get_aio_context() is an I/O code function.)
With that done, all implementations explicitly are I/O code, so we can
mark bdrv_child_get_parent_aio_context() as I/O code, too, so callers
know it is safe to run from both GS and I/O contexts.
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221107151321.211175-2-hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
The functions are marked coroutine_fn in the definition.
Signed-off-by: Alberto Faria <afaria@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221013123711.620631-6-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
There is only user of bdrv_qiov_is_aligned(), so move the alignment
function to there and make it static.
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Message-Id: <20220929200523.3218710-2-kbusch@meta.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
Also convert bdrv_pwrite_sync() to being implemented using
generated_co_wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Alberto Faria <afaria@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220609152744.3891847-9-afaria@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
|
|
bdrv_{pread,pwrite}() now return -EIO instead of -EINVAL when 'bytes' is
negative, making them consistent with bdrv_{preadv,pwritev}() and
bdrv_co_{pread,pwrite,preadv,pwritev}().
bdrv_pwrite_zeroes() now also calls trace_bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes() and
clears the BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP flag when appropriate, which it didn't
previously.
Signed-off-by: Alberto Faria <afaria@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220609152744.3891847-8-afaria@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
|
|
Swap 'buf' and 'bytes' around for consistency with
bdrv_co_{pread,pwrite}(), and in preparation to implement these
functions using generated_co_wrapper.
Callers were updated using this Coccinelle script:
@@ expression child, offset, buf, bytes, flags; @@
- bdrv_pread(child, offset, buf, bytes, flags)
+ bdrv_pread(child, offset, bytes, buf, flags)
@@ expression child, offset, buf, bytes, flags; @@
- bdrv_pwrite(child, offset, buf, bytes, flags)
+ bdrv_pwrite(child, offset, bytes, buf, flags)
@@ expression child, offset, buf, bytes, flags; @@
- bdrv_pwrite_sync(child, offset, buf, bytes, flags)
+ bdrv_pwrite_sync(child, offset, bytes, buf, flags)
Resulting overly-long lines were then fixed by hand.
Signed-off-by: Alberto Faria <afaria@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20220609152744.3891847-3-afaria@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
|
|
For consistency with other I/O functions, and in preparation to
implement them using generated_co_wrapper.
Callers were updated using this Coccinelle script:
@@ expression child, offset, buf, bytes; @@
- bdrv_pread(child, offset, buf, bytes)
+ bdrv_pread(child, offset, buf, bytes, 0)
@@ expression child, offset, buf, bytes; @@
- bdrv_pwrite(child, offset, buf, bytes)
+ bdrv_pwrite(child, offset, buf, bytes, 0)
@@ expression child, offset, buf, bytes; @@
- bdrv_pwrite_sync(child, offset, buf, bytes)
+ bdrv_pwrite_sync(child, offset, buf, bytes, 0)
Resulting overly-long lines were then fixed by hand.
Signed-off-by: Alberto Faria <afaria@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20220609152744.3891847-2-afaria@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
|
|
bdrv_co_drain() has not been used since commit 9a0cec664eef ("mirror:
use bdrv_drained_begin/bdrv_drained_end") in 2016. Remove it so there
are fewer drain scenarios to worry about.
Use bdrv_drained_begin()/bdrv_drained_end() instead. They are "mixed"
functions that can be called from coroutine context. Unlike
bdrv_co_drain(), these functions provide control of the length of the
drained section, which is usually the right thing.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220521122714.3837731-1-stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alberto Faria <afaria@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
This function is safe to call in an I/O context, and qcow2_do_open()
does so (invoked in an I/O context by qcow2_co_invalidate_cache()).
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220427114057.36651-2-hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
Mark all I/O functions with IO_CODE, and all "I/O OR GS" with
IO_OR_GS_CODE.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220303151616.325444-6-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
block.h currently contains a mix of functions:
some of them run under the BQL and modify the block layer graph,
others are instead thread-safe and perform I/O in iothreads.
Some others can only be called by either the main loop or the
iothread running the AioContext (and not other iothreads),
and using them in another thread would cause deadlocks, and therefore
it is not ideal to define them as I/O.
It is not easy to understand which function is part of which
group (I/O vs GS vs "I/O or GS"), and this patch aims to clarify it.
The "GS" functions need the BQL, and often use
aio_context_acquire/release and/or drain to be sure they
can modify the graph safely.
The I/O function are instead thread safe, and can run in
any AioContext.
"I/O or GS" functions run instead in the main loop or in
a single iothread, and use BDRV_POLL_WHILE().
By splitting the header in two files, block-io.h
and block-global-state.h we have a clearer view on what
needs what kind of protection. block-common.h
contains common structures shared by both headers.
block.h is left there for legacy and to avoid changing
all includes in all c files that use the block APIs.
Assertions are added in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220303151616.325444-4-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
