aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/hw/pci-host
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2022-07-26i386/pc: create pci-host qdev prior to pc_memory_init()Joao Martins
At the start of pc_memory_init() we usually pass a range of 0..UINT64_MAX as pci_memory, when really its 2G (i440fx) or 32G (q35). To get the real user value, we need to get pci-host passed property for default pci_hole64_size. Thus to get that, create the qdev prior to memory init to better make estimations on max used/phys addr. This is in preparation to determine that host-phys-bits are enough and also for pci-hole64-size to be considered to relocate ram-above-4g to be at 1T (on AMD platforms). Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20220719170014.27028-3-joao.m.martins@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2022-07-06ppc: Define SETFIELD for the ppc targetAlexey Kardashevskiy
It keeps repeating, move it to the header. This uses __builtin_ffsll() to allow using the macros in #define. This is not using the QEMU's FIELD macros as this would require changing all such macros found in skiboot (the PPC PowerNV firmware). Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220628080544.1509428-1-aik@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
2022-07-06ppc/pnv: remove 'INTERFACE_PCIE_DEVICE' from phb4 root busDaniel Henrique Barboza
It's unneeded. No other PCIE_BUS implements this interface. Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com> Fixes: 4f9924c4d4cf ("ppc/pnv: Add models for POWER9 PHB4 PCIe Host bridge") Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220621173436.165912-9-danielhb413@gmail.com>
2022-07-06ppc/pnv: remove 'INTERFACE_PCIE_DEVICE' from phb3 root busDaniel Henrique Barboza
It's unneeded. No other PCIE_BUS implements this interface. Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com> Fixes: 9ae1329ee2fe ("ppc/pnv: Add models for POWER8 PHB3 PCIe Host bridge") Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220621173436.165912-8-danielhb413@gmail.com>
2022-07-06ppc/pnv: assign pnv-phb-root-port chassis/slot earlierDaniel Henrique Barboza
It is not advisable to execute an object_dynamic_cast() to poke into bus->qbus.parent and follow it up with a C cast into the PnvPHB type we think we got. In fact this is not needed. There is nothing sophisticated being done with the PHB object retrieved during root_port_realize() for both PHB3 and PHB4. We're retrieving a PHB reference just to access phb->chip_id and phb->phb_id and use them to define the chassis/slot of the root port. phb->phb_id is already being passed to pnv_phb_attach_root_port() via the 'index' parameter. Let's also add a 'chip_id' parameter to this function and assign chassis and slot right there. This will spare us from the hassle of accessing the PHB object inside realize(). Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20220621173436.165912-4-danielhb413@gmail.com>
2022-07-06ppc/pnv: attach phb3/phb4 root ports in QOM treeDaniel Henrique Barboza
At this moment we leave the pnv-phb3(4)-root-port unattached in QOM: /unattached (container) (...) /device[2] (pnv-phb3-root-port) /bus master container[0] (memory-region) /bus master[0] (memory-region) /pci_bridge_io[0] (memory-region) /pci_bridge_io[1] (memory-region) /pci_bridge_mem[0] (memory-region) /pci_bridge_pci[0] (memory-region) /pci_bridge_pref_mem[0] (memory-region) /pci_bridge_vga_io_hi[0] (memory-region) /pci_bridge_vga_io_lo[0] (memory-region) /pci_bridge_vga_mem[0] (memory-region) /pcie.0 (PCIE) Let's make changes in pnv_phb_attach_root_port() to attach the created root ports to its corresponding PHB. This is the result afterwards: /pnv-phb3[0] (pnv-phb3) /lsi (ics) /msi (phb3-msi) /msi32[0] (memory-region) /msi64[0] (memory-region) /pbcq (pnv-pbcq) (...) /phb3_iommu[0] (pnv-phb3-iommu-memory-region) /pnv-phb3-root.0 (pnv-phb3-root) /pnv-phb3-root-port[0] (pnv-phb3-root-port) /bus master container[0] (memory-region) /bus master[0] (memory-region) /pci_bridge_io[0] (memory-region) /pci_bridge_io[1] (memory-region) /pci_bridge_mem[0] (memory-region) /pci_bridge_pci[0] (memory-region) /pci_bridge_pref_mem[0] (memory-region) /pci_bridge_vga_io_hi[0] (memory-region) /pci_bridge_vga_io_lo[0] (memory-region) /pci_bridge_vga_mem[0] (memory-region) /pcie.0 (PCIE) Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220621173436.165912-3-danielhb413@gmail.com>
2022-07-06ppc/pnv: move root port attach to pnv_phb4_realize()Daniel Henrique Barboza
Creating a root port is something related to the PHB, not the PEC. It also makes the logic more in line with what pnv-phb3 does. Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220621173436.165912-2-danielhb413@gmail.com>
2022-06-28hw/pci-host/i440fx: Remove unused parameter from i440fx_init()Bernhard Beschow
pi440fx_state is an out-parameter which is never read by the caller. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> Message-Id: <20220612192800.40813-1-shentey@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
2022-06-20ppc/pnv: fix extra indent spaces with DEFINE_PROP*Daniel Henrique Barboza
The DEFINE_PROP* macros in pnv files are using extra spaces for no good reason. Cc: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> Message-Id: <20220602215351.149910-1-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
2022-06-15q35:Enable TSEG only when G_SMRAME and TSEG_EN both enabledZhenzhong Duan
According to spec: "TSEG Enable (T_EN): Enabling of SMRAM memory for Extended SMRAM space only. When G_SMRAME = 1 and TSEG_EN = 1, the TSEG is enabled to appear in the appropriate physical address space. Note that once D_LCK is set, this bit becomes read only." Changed to match the spec description. Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com> Message-Id: <20220615034501.2733802-1-zhenzhong.duan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2022-05-13hw/pci-host/gpex-acpi: Add support for dsdt construction for pxb-cxlJonathan Cameron
This adds code to instantiate the slightly extended ACPI root port description in DSDT as per the CXL 2.0 specification. Basically a cut and paste job from the i386/pc code. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20220429144110.25167-30-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2022-05-08dino: move from hw/hppa to hw/pci-hostMark Cave-Ayland
Move the DINO device implementation from hw/hppa to hw/pci-host so that it is located with all the other PCI host bridges. Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> Acked-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Message-Id: <20220504092600.10048-23-mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
2022-04-20ppc/pnv: Remove LSI on the PCIE host bridgeFrederic Barrat
The phb3/phb4/phb5 root ports inherit from the default PCIE root port implementation, which requests a LSI interrupt (#INTA). On real hardware (POWER8/POWER9/POWER10), there is no such LSI. This patch corrects it so that it matches the hardware. As a consequence, the device tree previously generated was bogus, as the root bridge LSI was not properly mapped. On some implementation (powernv9), it was leading to inconsistent interrupt controller (xive) data. With this patch, it is now clean. Signed-off-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220408131303.147840-3-fbarrat@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
2022-04-06Remove qemu-common.h include from most unitsMarc-André Lureau
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20220323155743.1585078-33-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2022-03-21Use g_new() & friends where that makes obvious senseMarkus Armbruster
g_new(T, n) is neater than g_malloc(sizeof(T) * n). It's also safer, for two reasons. One, it catches multiplication overflowing size_t. Two, it returns T * rather than void *, which lets the compiler catch more type errors. This commit only touches allocations with size arguments of the form sizeof(T). Patch created mechanically with: $ spatch --in-place --sp-file scripts/coccinelle/use-g_new-etc.cocci \ --macro-file scripts/cocci-macro-file.h FILES... Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Acked-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20220315144156.1595462-4-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Dovgalyuk <Pavel.Dovgalyuk@ispras.ru>
2022-03-14ppc/pnv: Remove user-created PHB{3,4,5} devicesCédric Le Goater
On a real system with POWER{8,9,10} processors, PHBs are sub-units of the processor, they can be deactivated by firmware but not plugged in or out like a PCI adapter on a slot. Nevertheless, having user-created PHBs in QEMU seemed to be a good idea for testing purposes : 1. having a limited set of PHBs speedups boot time. 2. it is useful to be able to mimic a partially broken topology you some time have to deal with during bring-up. PowerNV is also used for distro install tests and having libvirt support eases these tasks. libvirt prefers to run the machine with -nodefaults to be sure not to drag unexpected devices which would need to be defined in the domain file without being specified on the QEMU command line. For this reason : 3. -nodefaults should not include default PHBs User-created PHB{3,4,5} devices satisfied all these needs but reality proves to be a bit more complex, internally when modeling such devices, and externally when dealing with the user interface. Req 1. and 2. can be simply addressed differently with a machine option: "phb-mask=<uint>", which QEMU would use to enable/disable PHB device nodes when creating the device tree. For Req 3., we need to make sure we are taking the right approach. It seems that we should expose a new type of user-created PHB device, a generic virtualized one, that libvirt would use and not one depending on the processor revision. This needs more thinking. For now, remove user-created PHB{3,4,5} devices. All the cleanups we did are not lost and they will be useful for the next steps. Fixes: 5bc67b052b51 ("ppc/pnv: Introduce user creatable pnv-phb4 devices") Fixes: 1f6a88fffc75 ("ppc/pnv: Introduce support for user created PHB3 devices") Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220314130514.529931-1-clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-03-14ppc/pnv: Introduce a pnv-phb5 device to match root portFrederic Barrat
We already have the pnv-phb3 and pnv-phb4 devices for POWER8 and POWER9 respectively. POWER10 uses version 5 of the PHB. It is very close to the PHB4 from POWER9, at least in our model and we could almost keep using the PHB4 model. However the matching root port pnv-phb5-root-port is specific to POWER10 so to avoid confusion as well as making it easy to introduce differences later, we create a pnv-phb5 class, which is mostly an alias for pnv-phb4 for now. With this patch, the command line for a user-created PHB on powernv10 becomes: -machine powernv10 -nodefaults -device pnv-phb5 -device pnv-phb5-root-port Fixes: 623575e16cd5 ("ppc/pnv: Add model for POWER10 PHB5 PCIe Host bridge") Signed-off-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220310155101.294568-2-fbarrat@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-03-02ppc/pnv: Add support for PHB5 "Address-based trigger" modeCédric Le Goater
When the Address-Based Interrupt Trigger mode is activated, the PHB maps the interrupt source number into the interrupt command address. The PHB directly triggers the IC ESB page of the interrupt number and not the notify page of the IC anymore. Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-03-02ppc/pnv: Add support for PQ offload on PHB5Cédric Le Goater
The PQ_disable configuration bit disables the check done on the PQ state bits when processing new MSI interrupts. When bit 9 is enabled, the PHB forwards any MSI trigger to the XIVE interrupt controller without checking the PQ state bits. The XIVE IC knows from the trigger message that the PQ bits have not been checked and performs the check locally. This configuration bit only applies to MSIs and LSIs are still checked on the PHB to handle the assertion level. PQ_disable enablement is a requirement for StoreEOI. Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-03-02ppc/xive: Add support for PQ state bits offloadCédric Le Goater
The trigger message coming from a HW source contains a special bit informing the XIVE interrupt controller that the PQ bits have been checked at the source or not. Depending on the value, the IC can perform the check and the state transition locally using its own PQ state bits. The following changes add new accessors to the XiveRouter required to query and update the PQ state bits. This only applies to the PowerNV machine. sPAPR accessors are provided but the pSeries machine should not be concerned by such complex configuration for the moment. Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-03-02ppc/pnv: Add model for POWER10 PHB5 PCIe Host bridgeCédric Le Goater
PHB4 and PHB5 are very similar. Use the PHB4 models with some minor adjustements in a subclass for P10. Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-03-02ppc/pnv: fix default PHB4 QOM hierarchyDaniel Henrique Barboza
Commit 3f4c369ea63e ("ppc/pnv: make PECs create and realize PHB4s") changed phb4_pec code to create the default PHB4 objects in pnv_pec_default_phb_realize(). In this process the stacks[] PEC array was removed and each PHB4 object is tied together with its PEC via the phb->pec pointer. This change also broke the previous QOM hierarchy - the PHB4 objects are being created and not being parented to their respective chips. This can be verified by 'info pic' in a powernv9 domain with default settings. pnv_chip_power9_pic_print_info() will fail to find the PHBs because object_child_foreach_recursive() won't find any. The solution is to set the parent chip and the parent bus, in the same way done for user created PHB4 devices, for all PHB4 devices. Fixes: 3f4c369ea63e ("ppc/pnv: make PECs create and realize PHB4s") Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220218202804.413157-1-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-28ppc/pnv: use a do-while() loop in pnv_phb4_translate_tve()Daniel Henrique Barboza
pnv_phb4_translate_tve() is quite similar to pnv_phb3_translate_tve(), and that includes the fact that 'taddr' can be considered uninitialized when throwing the "TCE access fault" error because, in theory, the loop that sets 'taddr' can be skippable due to 'lev' being an signed int. No one complained about this specific case yet, but since we took the time to handle the same situtation in pnv_phb3_translate_tve(), let's replicate it here as well. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Matheus Ferst <matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br> Message-Id: <20220127122234.842145-3-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-28ppc/pnv: use a do-while() loop in pnv_phb3_translate_tve()Daniel Henrique Barboza
The 'taddr' variable is left unintialized, being set only inside the "while ((lev--) >= 0)" loop where we get the TCE address. The 'lev' var is an int32_t that is being initiliazed by the GETFIELD() macro, which returns an uint64_t. For a human reader this means that 'lev' will always be positive or zero. But some compilers may beg to differ. 'lev' being an int32_t can in theory be set as negative, and the "while ((lev--) >= 0)" loop might never be reached, and 'taddr' will be left unitialized. This can cause phb3_error() to use 'taddr' uninitialized down below: if ((is_write & !(tce & 2)) || ((!is_write) && !(tce & 1))) { phb3_error(phb, "TCE access fault at 0x%"PRIx64, taddr); A quick way of fixing it is to use a do/while() loop. This will keep the same semanting as the existing while() loop does and the compiler will understand that 'taddr' will be initialized at least once. Suggested-by: Matheus K. Ferst <matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br> Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/573 Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220127122234.842145-2-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-28ppc/pnv: Fail DMA access if page permissions are not correctFrederic Barrat
If an iommu page has wrong permissions, an error message is displayed, but the access is allowed, which is odd. This patch fixes it. Signed-off-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220121152350.381685-1-fbarrat@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: Remove PHB4 version propertyCédric Le Goater
Grab the PHB version from the PEC class directly when needed. Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220117122753.1655504-4-clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: Add a 'rp_model' class attribute for the PHB4 PECCédric Le Goater
PHB5 will introduce its own root port model. Prepare ground for it. Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220117122753.1655504-3-clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: Move root port allocation under pnv_pec_default_phb_realize()Cédric Le Goater
The root port device is currently created and attached to the PHB early in pnv_phb4_realize(). Do it under pnv_pec_default_phb_realize() after the PHB is fully realized. It's cleaner and avoids an extra test on defaults_enabled(). Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220117122753.1655504-2-clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: rename pnv_pec_stk_update_map()Daniel Henrique Barboza
This function does not use 'stack' anymore. Rename it to pnv_pec_phb_update_map(). Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220114180719.52117-9-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: remove PnvPhb4PecStack objectDaniel Henrique Barboza
All the complexity that was scattered between PnvPhb4PecStack and PnvPHB4 are now centered in the PnvPHB4 device. PnvPhb4PecStack does not serve any purpose in the current code base. Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220114180719.52117-8-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: make PECs create and realize PHB4sDaniel Henrique Barboza
This patch changes the design of the PEC device to create and realize PHB4s instead of PecStacks. After all the recent changes, PHB4s now contain all the information needed for their proper functioning, not relying on PecStack in any capacity. All changes are being made in a single patch to avoid renaming parts of the PecState and leaving the code in a strange way. E.g. rename PecClass->num_stacks to num_phbs, which would then read a pnv_pec_num_stacks[] array. To avoid mixing the old and new design more than necessary it's clearer to do these changes in a single step. The name changes made are: - in PnvPhb4PecState: * rename 'num_stacks' to 'num_phbs' * remove the pec->stacks[] array. Current code relies on the pec->stacks[] obj acting as a simple container, without ever accessing pec->stacks[] for any other purpose. Instead of converting this into a pec->phbs[] array, remove it - in PnvPhb4PecClass, rename *num_stacks to *num_phbs; - pnv_pec_num_stacks[] is renamed to pnv_pec_num_phbs[]. The logical changes: - pnv_pec_default_phb_realize(): * init and set the properties of the PnvPHB4 qdev * do not use stack->phb anymore; - pnv_pec_realize(): * use the new default_phb_realize() to init/realize each PHB if running with defaults; - pnv_pec_instance_init(): removed since we're creating the PHBs during pec_realize(); - pnv_phb4_get_stack(): * renamed to pnv_phb4_get_pec() and returns a PnvPhb4PecState*; - pnv_phb4_realize(): use 'phb->pec' instead of 'stack'. This design change shouldn't caused any behavioral change in the runtime of the machine. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220114180719.52117-7-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: remove PnvPhb4PecStack::stack_noDaniel Henrique Barboza
pnv_pec_default_phb_realize() stopped using it after the previous patch and no one else is using it. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220114180719.52117-6-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: move default_phb_realize() to pec_realize()Daniel Henrique Barboza
Move the current pnv_pec_stk_default_phb_realize() call to pec_realize(), renaming the function to pnv_pec_default_phb_realize(), and set the PHB attributes using the PEC object directly. This will be important to allow for PECs devices to handle PHB4s directly later on. Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220114180719.52117-5-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: remove stack pointer from PnvPHB4Daniel Henrique Barboza
This pointer was being used for two reasons: pnv_phb4_update_regions() was using it to access the PHB and phb4_realize() was using it as a way to determine if the PHB was user created. We can determine if the PHB is user created via phb->pec, introduced in the previous patch, and pnv_phb4_update_regions() is no longer using stack->phb. Remove the pointer from the PnvPHB4 device. Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220114180719.52117-4-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: reduce stack->stack_no usageDaniel Henrique Barboza
'stack->stack_no' represents the order that a stack appears in its PEC. Its primary use is in XSCOM address space calculation in pnv_phb4_xscom_realize() when calculating the memory region offset. This attribute is redundant with phb->phb_id, which is calculated via pnv_phb4_pec_get_phb_id() using stack->stack_no information. It'll also be awkward to assign it when dealing with PECs and PHBs only in a future patch. A new pnv_phb4_get_phb_stack_no() helper is introduced to eliminate most of the stack->stack_no uses we have. The only use left after this patch is during pnv_pec_stk_default_phb_realize() when calculating phb_id, which will also handled in the next patches. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220114180719.52117-3-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: introduce PnvPHB4 'pec' propertyDaniel Henrique Barboza
This property will track the owner PEC of this PHB. For now it's redundant since we can retrieve the PEC via phb->stack->pec but it will not be redundant when we get rid of the stack device. Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220114180719.52117-2-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: move phb_regs_mr to PnvPHB4Daniel Henrique Barboza
After recent changes, this MemoryRegion can be migrated to PnvPHB4 without too much trouble. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-11-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: move nest_regs_mr to PnvPHB4Daniel Henrique Barboza
We're now able to cleanly move nest_regs_mr to the PnvPHB4 device. One thing of notice here is the need to use a phb->stack->pec pointer because pnv_pec_stk_nest_xscom_write requires a PEC object. Another thing that can be noticed in the use of 'stack->stack_no' that still remains throughout the XSCOM code. After moving all MemoryRegions to the PnvPHB4 object, this illustrates what is the remaining role of the stack: provide a PEC pointer and the 'stack_no' information. If we can provide these in the PnvPHB4 object instead (spoiler: we can, and we will), the PnvPhb4PecStack device will be deprecated and can be removed. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-10-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: change pnv_pec_stk_update_map() to use PnvPHB4Daniel Henrique Barboza
stack->nest_regs_mr wasn't migrated to PnvPHB4 together with phb->nest_regs[] in the previous patch. We were unable to cleanly convert its write MemoryRegionOps, pnv_pec_stk_nest_xscom_write(), to use PnvPHB4 instead of PnvPhb4PecStack due to pnv_pec_stk_update_map() using a stack. Thing is, we're now able to convert pnv_pec_stk_update_map() because of what the did in previous patch. The need for this intermediate step is a good example of the interconnected relationship between stack and phb that we aim to cleanup. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-9-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: move nest_regs[] to PnvPHB4Daniel Henrique Barboza
stack->nest_regs[] is used in several XSCOM functions and it's one of the main culprits of having to deal with stack->phb pointers around the code. Sure, we're having to add 2 extra stack->phb pointers to ease nest_regs[] migration to PnvPHB4. They'll be dealt with shortly. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-8-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: move mmbar0/mmbar1 and friends to PnvPHB4Daniel Henrique Barboza
These 2 MemoryRegions, together with mmio(0|1)_base and mmio(0|1)_size variables, are used together in the same functions. We're better of moving them all in a single step. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-7-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: change pnv_phb4_update_regions() to use PnvPHB4Daniel Henrique Barboza
The function does not rely on stack for anything it does anymore. This is also one less instance of 'stack->phb' that we need to worry about. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-6-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: move intbar to PnvPHB4Daniel Henrique Barboza
This MemoryRegion can also be moved in a single step. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-5-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: move phbbar to PnvPHB4Daniel Henrique Barboza
This MemoryRegion is simple enough to be moved in a single step. A 'stack->phb' pointer had to be introduced in pnv_pec_stk_update_map() because this function isn't ready to be fully converted to use a PnvPHB4 pointer instead. This will be dealt with in the following patches. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-4-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: move PCI registers to PnvPHB4Daniel Henrique Barboza
Previous patch changed pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_read() and pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_write() to use a PnvPHB4 opaque, making it easier to move both pci_regs[] and the pci_regs_mr MemoryRegion to the PnvHB4 object. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-3-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: use PHB4 obj in pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_opsDaniel Henrique Barboza
The current relationship between PnvPhb4PecStack and PnvPHB4 objects is overly complex. Recent work done in pnv_phb4.c and pnv_phb4_pec.c shows that the stack obj role in the overall design is more of a placeholder for its 'phb' object, having no atributes that stand on its own. This became clearer after pnv-phb4 user creatable devices were implemented. What remains now are a lot of stack->phb and phb->stack pointers throughout .read and .write callbacks of MemoryRegionOps that are being initialized in phb4_realize() time. stk_realize() is a no-op if the machine is being run with -nodefaults. The first step of trying to decouple the stack and phb relationship is to move the MemoryRegionOps that belongs to PnvPhb4PecStack to PhbPHB4. Unfortunately this can't be done without some preliminary steps to change the usage of 'stack' and replace it with 'phb' in these read/write callbacks. This patch starts this process by using a PnvPHB4 opaque in pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_ops instead of PnvPhb4PecStack. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-2-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-12ppc/pnv: use stack->pci_regs[] in pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_write()Daniel Henrique Barboza
pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_write() is pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_ops write callback. It writes values into regs in the stack->nest_regs[] array. The pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_read read callback, on the other hand, returns values of the stack->pci_regs[]. In fact, at this moment, the only use of stack->pci_regs[] is in pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_read(). There's no code that is written anything in stack->pci_regs[], which is suspicious. Considering that stack->nest_regs[] is widely used by the nested MemoryOps pnv_pec_stk_nest_xscom_ops, in both read and write callbacks, the conclusion is that we're writing the wrong array in pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_write(). This function should write stack->pci_regs[] instead. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20220111200132.633896-2-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-12ppc/pnv: turn pnv_phb4_update_regions() into staticDaniel Henrique Barboza
Its only callers are inside pnv_phb4.c. Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220111131027.599784-6-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-12ppc/pnv: Introduce user creatable pnv-phb4 devicesDaniel Henrique Barboza
This patch introduces pnv-phb4 user creatable devices that are created in a similar manner as pnv-phb3 devices, allowing the user to interact with the PHBs directly instead of creating PCI Express Controllers that will create a certain amount of PHBs per controller index. We accomplish this by doing the following: - add a pnv_phb4_get_stack() helper to retrieve which stack an user created phb4 would occupy; - when dealing with an user created pnv-phb4 (detected by checking if phb->stack is NULL at the start of phb4_realize()), retrieve its stack and initialize its properties as done in stk_realize(); - use 'defaults_enabled()' in stk_realize() to avoid creating and initializing a 'stack->phb' qdev that might be overwritten by an user created pnv-phb4 device. This process is wrapped into a new helper called pnv_pec_stk_default_phb_realize(). Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220111131027.599784-5-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-12ppc/pnv: turn 'phb' into a pointer in struct PnvPhb4PecStackDaniel Henrique Barboza
At this moment, stack->phb is the plain PnvPHB4 device itself instead of a pointer to the device. This will present a problem when adding user creatable devices because we can't deal with this struct and the realize() callback from the user creatable device. We can't get rid of this attribute, similar to what we did when enabling pnv-phb3 user creatable devices, because pnv_phb4_update_regions() needs to access stack->phb to do its job. This function is called twice in pnv_pec_stk_update_map(), which is one of the nested xscom write callbacks (via pnv_pec_stk_nest_xscom_write()). In fact, pnv_pec_stk_update_map() code comment is explicit about how the order of the unmap/map operations relates with the PHB subregions. All of this indicates that this code is tied together in a way that we either go on a crusade, featuring lots of refactories and redesign and considerable pain, to decouple stack and phb mapping, or we allow stack update_map operations to access the associated PHB as it is today even after introducing pnv-phb4 user devices. This patch chooses the latter. Instead of getting rid of stack->phb, turn it into a PHB pointer. This will allow us to assign an user created PHB to an existing stack later. In this process, pnv_pec_stk_instance_init() is removed because stack->phb is being initialized in stk_realize() instead. Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220111131027.599784-4-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>