| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
In the TZ Memory Protection Controller, the BLK_MAX register is supposed
to return the maximum permitted value of the BLK_IDX register. Our
implementation incorrectly returned max+1 (ie the total number of
valid index values, since BLK_IDX is zero-based).
Correct this off-by-one error. Since we consistently initialize
and use s->blk_max throughout the implementation as the 'size'
of the LUT, just adjust the value we return when the guest reads
the BLK_MAX register, rather than trying to change the semantics
of the s->blk_max internal struct field.
Fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1806824
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20181213183249.3468-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
The API of cpu_physical_memory_write_rom() is odd, because it
takes an AddressSpace, unlike all the other cpu_physical_memory_*
access functions. Rename it to address_space_write_rom(), and
bring its API into line with address_space_write().
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20181122133507.30950-3-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
In the tz-mpc device we allocate a data block for the LUT,
which we then clear to zero in the device's reset method.
This is conceptually fine, but unfortunately results in a
valgrind complaint about use of uninitialized data on startup:
==30906== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==30906== at 0x503609: tz_mpc_translate (tz-mpc.c:439)
==30906== by 0x3F3D90: address_space_translate_iommu (exec.c:511)
==30906== by 0x3F3FF8: flatview_do_translate (exec.c:584)
==30906== by 0x3F4292: flatview_translate (exec.c:644)
==30906== by 0x3F2120: address_space_translate (memory.h:1962)
==30906== by 0x3FB753: address_space_ldl_internal (memory_ldst.inc.c:36)
==30906== by 0x3FB8A6: address_space_ldl (memory_ldst.inc.c:80)
==30906== by 0x619037: ldl_phys (memory_ldst_phys.inc.h:25)
==30906== by 0x61985D: arm_cpu_reset (cpu.c:255)
==30906== by 0x98791B: cpu_reset (cpu.c:249)
==30906== by 0x57FFDB: armv7m_reset (armv7m.c:265)
==30906== by 0x7B1775: qemu_devices_reset (reset.c:69)
This is because of a reset ordering problem -- the TZ MPC
resets after the CPU, but an M-profile CPU's reset function
includes memory loads to get the initial PC and SP, which
then go through an MPC that hasn't yet been reset.
The simplest fix for this is to zero the LUT when we
initialize the data, which will result in the MPC's
translate function giving the right answers for these
early memory accesses.
Reported-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20180724153616.32352-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
The final part of the Memory Protection Controller we need to
implement is actually using the BLK_LUT data programmed by the
guest to determine whether to block the transaction or not.
Since this means we now change transaction mappings when
the guest writes to BLK_LUT, we must also call the IOMMU
notifiers at that point.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20180620132032.28865-5-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
The MPC is guest-configurable for whether blocked accesses:
* should be RAZ/WI or cause a bus error
* should generate an interrupt or not
Implement this behaviour in the blocked-access handlers.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20180620132032.28865-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
Implement the missing registers for the TZ MPC.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20180620132032.28865-3-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
Implement the Arm TrustZone Memory Protection Controller, which sits
in front of RAM and allows secure software to configure it to either
pass through or reject transactions.
We implement the MPC as a QEMU IOMMU, which will direct transactions
either through to the devices and memory behind it or to a special
"never works" AddressSpace if they are blocked.
This initial commit implements the skeleton of the device:
* it always permits accesses
* it doesn't implement most of the registers
* it doesn't implement the interrupt or other behaviour
for blocked transactions
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20180620132032.28865-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
