aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/hw/mem/memory-device.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-06-19hw/mem/memory-device: Remove legacy_align from memory_device_pre_plug()Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
'legacy_align' is always NULL, remove it, simplifying memory_device_pre_plug(). Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20240617071118.60464-16-philmd@linaro.org>
2024-02-06memory-device: reintroduce memory region size checkDavid Hildenbrand
We used to check that the memory region size is multiples of the overall requested address alignment for the device memory address. We removed that check, because there are cases (i.e., hv-balloon) where devices unconditionally request an address alignment that has a very large alignment (i.e., 32 GiB), but the actual memory device size might not be multiples of that alignment. However, this change: (a) allows for some practically impossible DIMM sizes, like "1GB+1 byte". (b) allows for DIMMs that partially cover hugetlb pages, previously reported in [1]. Both scenarios don't make any sense: we might even waste memory. So let's reintroduce that check, but only check that the memory region size is multiples of the memory region alignment (i.e., page size, huge page size), but not any additional memory device requirements communicated using md->get_min_alignment(). The following examples now fail again as expected: (a) 1M with 2M THP qemu-system-x86_64 -m 4g,maxmem=16g,slots=1 -S -nodefaults -nographic \ -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem1,size=1M \ -device pc-dimm,id=dimm1,memdev=mem1 -> backend memory size must be multiple of 0x200000 (b) 1G+1byte qemu-system-x86_64 -m 4g,maxmem=16g,slots=1 -S -nodefaults -nographic \ -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem1,size=1073741825B \ -device pc-dimm,id=dimm1,memdev=mem1 -> backend memory size must be multiple of 0x200000 (c) Unliagned hugetlb size (2M) qemu-system-x86_64 -m 4g,maxmem=16g,slots=1 -S -nodefaults -nographic \ -object memory-backend-file,id=mem1,mem-path=/dev/hugepages/tmp,size=511M \ -device pc-dimm,id=dimm1,memdev=mem1 backend memory size must be multiple of 0x200000 (d) Unliagned hugetlb size (1G) qemu-system-x86_64 -m 4g,maxmem=16g,slots=1 -S -nodefaults -nographic \ -object memory-backend-file,id=mem1,mem-path=/dev/hugepages1G/tmp,size=2047M \ -device pc-dimm,id=dimm1,memdev=mem1 -> backend memory size must be multiple of 0x40000000 Note that this fix depends on a hv-balloon change to communicate its additional alignment requirements using get_min_alignment() instead of through the memory region. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/f77d641d500324525ac036fe1827b3070de75fc1.1701088320.git.mprivozn@redhat.com Message-ID: <20240117135554.787344-3-david@redhat.com> Reported-by: Zhenyu Zhang <zhenyzha@redhat.com> Reported-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> Fixes: eb1b7c4bd413 ("memory-device: Drop size alignment check") Tested-by: Zhenyu Zhang <zhenyzha@redhat.com> Tested-by: Mario Casquero <mcasquer@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
2023-11-15hw/mem/memory-device.c: spelling fix: ontainingMichael Tokarev
Fixes: 6c1b28e9e405 "memory-device: Support empty memory devices" Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
2023-11-06memory-device: Drop size alignment checkDavid Hildenbrand
There is no strong requirement that the size has to be multiples of the requested alignment, let's drop it. This is a preparation for hv-baloon. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com>
2023-11-03memory-device: Support empty memory devicesDavid Hildenbrand
Let's support empty memory devices -- memory devices that don't have a memory device region in the current configuration. hv-balloon with an optional memdev is the primary use case. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com>
2023-10-12memory-device,vhost: Support automatic decision on the number of memslotsDavid Hildenbrand
We want to support memory devices that can automatically decide how many memslots they will use. In the worst case, they have to use a single memslot. The target use cases are virtio-mem and the hyper-v balloon. Let's calculate a reasonable limit such a memory device may use, and instruct the device to make a decision based on that limit. Use a simple heuristic that considers: * A memslot soft-limit for all memory devices of 256; also, to not consume too many memslots -- which could harm performance. * Actually still free and unreserved memslots * The percentage of the remaining device memory region that memory device will occupy. Further, while we properly check before plugging a memory device whether there still is are free memslots, we have other memslot consumers (such as boot memory, PCI BARs) that don't perform any checks and might dynamically consume memslots without any prior reservation. So we might succeed in plugging a memory device, but once we dynamically map a PCI BAR we would be in trouble. Doing accounting / reservation / checks for all such users is problematic (e.g., sometimes we might temporarily split boot memory into two memslots, triggered by the BIOS). We use the historic magic memslot number of 509 as orientation to when supporting 256 memory devices -> memslots (leaving 253 for boot memory and other devices) has been proven to work reliable. We'll fallback to suggesting a single memslot if we don't have at least 509 total memslots. Plugging vhost devices with less than 509 memslots available while we have memory devices plugged that consume multiple memslots due to automatic decisions can be problematic. Most configurations might just fail due to "limit < used + reserved", however, it can also happen that these memory devices would suddenly consume memslots that would actually be required by other memslot consumers (boot, PCI BARs) later. Note that this has always been sketchy with vhost devices that support only a small number of memslots; but we don't want to make it any worse.So let's keep it simple and simply reject plugging such vhost devices in such a configuration. Eventually, all vhost devices that want to be fully compatible with such memory devices should support a decent number of memslots (>= 509). Message-ID: <20230926185738.277351-13-david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
2023-10-12memory-device,vhost: Support memory devices that dynamically consume memslotsDavid Hildenbrand
We want to support memory devices that have a dynamically managed memory region container as device memory region. This device memory region maps multiple RAM memory subregions (e.g., aliases to the same RAM memory region), whereby these subregions can be (un)mapped on demand. Each RAM subregion will consume a memslot in KVM and vhost, resulting in such a new device consuming memslots dynamically, and initially usually 0. We already track the number of used vs. required memslots for all memslots. From that, we can derive the number of reserved memslots that must not be used otherwise. The target use case is virtio-mem and the hyper-v balloon, which will dynamically map aliases to RAM memory region into their device memory region container. Properly document what's supported and what's not and extend the vhost memslot check accordingly. Message-ID: <20230926185738.277351-10-david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
2023-10-12memory-device: Track required and actually used memslots in DeviceMemoryStateDavid Hildenbrand
Let's track how many memslots are required by plugged memory devices and how many are currently actually getting used by plugged memory devices. "required - used" is the number of reserved memslots. For now, the number of used and required memslots is always equal, and there are no reservations. This is a preparation for memory devices that want to dynamically consume memslots after initially specifying how many they require -- where we'll end up with reserved memslots. To track the number of used memslots, create a new address space for our device memory and register a memory listener (add/remove) for that address space. Message-ID: <20230926185738.277351-9-david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
2023-10-12memory-device: Support memory devices with multiple memslotsDavid Hildenbrand
We want to support memory devices that have a memory region container as device memory region that maps multiple RAM memory regions. Let's start by supporting memory devices that statically map multiple RAM memory regions and, thereby, consume multiple memslots. We already have one device that uses a container as device memory region: NVDIMMs. However, a NVDIMM always ends up consuming exactly one memslot. Let's add support for that by asking the memory device via a new callback how many memslots it requires. Message-ID: <20230926185738.277351-7-david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
2023-10-12vhost: Return number of free memslotsDavid Hildenbrand
Let's return the number of free slots instead of only checking if there is a free slot. Required to support memory devices that consume multiple memslots. This is a preparation for memory devices that consume multiple memslots. Message-ID: <20230926185738.277351-6-david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
2023-10-12kvm: Return number of free memslotsDavid Hildenbrand
Let's return the number of free slots instead of only checking if there is a free slot. While at it, check all address spaces, which will also consider SMM under x86 correctly. This is a preparation for memory devices that consume multiple memslots. Message-ID: <20230926185738.277351-5-david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
2023-07-12memory-device: Track used region size in DeviceMemoryStateDavid Hildenbrand
Let's avoid iterating over all devices and simply track it in the DeviceMemoryState. Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20230623124553.400585-11-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
2023-07-12memory-device: Refactor memory_device_pre_plug()David Hildenbrand
Let's move memory_device_check_addable() and basic checks out of memory_device_get_free_addr() directly into memory_device_pre_plug(). Separating basic checks from address assignment is cleaner and prepares for further changes. As all memory device users now use memory_devices_init(), and that function enforces that the size is 0, we can drop the check for an empty region. Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20230623124553.400585-10-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
2023-07-12memory-device: Introduce machine_memory_devices_init()David Hildenbrand
Let's intrduce a new helper that we will use to replace existing memory device setup code during machine initialization. We'll enforce that the size has to be > 0. Once all machines were converted, we'll only allocate ms->device_memory if the size > 0. Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20230623124553.400585-3-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
2023-07-12memory-device: Unify enabled vs. supported error messagesDavid Hildenbrand
Let's unify the error messages, such that we can simply stop allocating ms->device_memory if the size would be 0 (and there are no memory devices ever). The case of "not supported by the machine" should barely pop up either way: if the machine doesn't support memory devices, it usually doesn't call the pre_plug handler ... Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20230623124553.400585-2-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
2023-03-22*: Add missing includes of qemu/error-report.hRichard Henderson
This had been pulled in via qemu/plugin.h from hw/core/cpu.h, but that will be removed. Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20230310195252.210956-5-richard.henderson@linaro.org> [AJB: add various additional cases shown by CI] Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20230315174331.2959-15-alex.bennee@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Emilio Cota <cota@braap.org>
2021-01-28qapi: More complex uses of QAPI_LIST_APPENDEric Blake
These cases require a bit more thought to review; in each case, the code was appending to a list, but not with a FOOList **tail variable. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Message-Id: <20210113221013.390592-6-eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> [Flawed change to qmp_guest_network_get_interfaces() dropped] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2020-11-03memory-device: Add get_min_alignment() callbackDavid Hildenbrand
Add a callback that can be used to express additional alignment requirements (exceeding the ones from the memory region). Will be used by virtio-mem to express special alignment requirements due to manually configured, big block sizes (e.g., 1GB with an ordinary memory-backend-ram). This avoids failing later when realizing, because auto-detection wasn't able to assign a properly aligned address. Reviewed-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20201008083029.9504-6-david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2020-11-03memory-device: Support big alignment requirementsDavid Hildenbrand
Let's warn instead of bailing out - the worst thing that can happen is that we'll fail hot/coldplug later. The user got warned, and this should be rare. This will be necessary for memory devices with rather big (user-defined) alignment requirements - say a virtio-mem device with a 2G block size - which will become important, for example, when supporting vfio in the future. Reviewed-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20201008083029.9504-5-david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2019-12-18memory-device: Fix memory pre-plug error API violationsMarkus Armbruster
memory_device_get_free_addr() dereferences @errp when memory_device_check_addable() fails. That's wrong; see the big comment in error.h. Introduced in commit 1b6d6af21b "pc-dimm: factor out capacity and slot checks into MemoryDevice". No caller actually passes null. Fix anyway: splice in a local Error *err, and error_propagate(). Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20191204093625.14836-11-armbru@redhat.com>
2019-10-15memory-device: break the loop if tmp exceed the hinted rangeWei Yang
The memory-device list built by memory_device_build_list is ordered by its address, this means if the tmp range exceed the hinted range, all the following range will not overlap with it. And this won't change default pc-dimm mapping and address assignment stay the same as before this change. Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> Message-Id: <20190730003740.20694-3-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
2019-10-15memory-device: not necessary to use goto for the last checkWei Yang
We are already at the last condition check. Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190730003740.20694-2-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
2019-08-16Include hw/qdev-properties.h lessMarkus Armbruster
In my "build everything" tree, changing hw/qdev-properties.h triggers a recompile of some 2700 out of 6600 objects (not counting tests and objects that don't depend on qemu/osdep.h). Many places including hw/qdev-properties.h (directly or via hw/qdev.h) actually need only hw/qdev-core.h. Include hw/qdev-core.h there instead. hw/qdev.h is actually pointless: all it does is include hw/qdev-core.h and hw/qdev-properties.h, which in turn includes hw/qdev-core.h. Replace the remaining uses of hw/qdev.h by hw/qdev-properties.h. While there, delete a few superfluous inclusions of hw/qdev-core.h. Touching hw/qdev-properties.h now recompiles some 1200 objects. Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com> Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190812052359.30071-22-armbru@redhat.com>
2019-01-09memory-device: rewrite address assignment using rangesDavid Hildenbrand
Let's rewrite it properly using ranges. This fixes certain overflows that are right now possible. E.g. qemu-system-x86_64 -m 4G,slots=20,maxmem=40G -M pc \ -object memory-backend-file,id=mem1,share,mem-path=/dev/zero,size=2G -device pc-dimm,memdev=mem1,id=dimm1,addr=-0x40000000 Now properly errors out instead of succeeding. (Note that qapi parsing of huge uint64_t values is broken and fixes are on the way) "can't add memory device [0xffffffffa0000000:0x80000000], usable range for memory devices [0x140000000:0xe00000000]" Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181214131043.25071-3-david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
2018-12-11memory-device: avoid overflows on very huge devicesDavid Hildenbrand
Should not be a problem right now, but it could theoretically happen in the future. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181023152306.3123-7-david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
2018-12-11memory-device: use QEMU_IS_ALIGNEDDavid Hildenbrand
Shorter and easier to read. Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181023152306.3123-6-david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
2018-10-24memory-device: trace when pre_plugging/plugging/unpluggingDavid Hildenbrand
Let's trace the address and the id of a memory device when pre_plugging/plugging/unplugging succeeded. Trace it when pre_plugging as well as when plugging, so we really know when a specific address is actually used. Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181005092024.14344-17-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
2018-10-24memory-device: complete factoring out unplug handlingDavid Hildenbrand
With the new memory device functions in place, we can factor out unplugging of memory devices completely. Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181005092024.14344-16-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
2018-10-24memory-device: complete factoring out plug handlingDavid Hildenbrand
With the new memory device functions in place, we can factor out plugging of memory devices completely. Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181005092024.14344-15-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
2018-10-24memory-device: complete factoring out pre_plug handlingDavid Hildenbrand
With all required memory device class functions in place, we can factor out pre_plug handling of memory devices. Take proper care of errors. We still have to carry along legacy_align required for pc compatibility handling. We will factor out tracing of the address separately in a follow-up patch. Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181005092024.14344-14-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
2018-10-24memory-device: drop get_region_size()David Hildenbrand
There are no remaining users of get_region_size() except memory_device_get_region_size() itself. We can make memory_device_get_region_size() work directly on get_memory_region() instead and drop get_region_size(). In addition, we can now use memory_device_get_region_size() in pc-dimm code to implement get_plugged_size()" Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181005092024.14344-12-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
2018-10-24memory-device: add and use memory_device_get_region_size()David Hildenbrand
We will factor out get_memory_region() from pc-dimm to memory device code soon. Once that is done, get_region_size() can be implemented generically and essentially be replaced by memory_device_get_region_size (and work only on get_memory_region()). We have some users of get_memory_region() (spapr and pc-dimm code) that are only interested in the size. So let's rework them to use memory_device_get_region_size() first, then we can factor out get_memory_region() and eventually remove get_region_size() without touching the same code multiple times. Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181005092024.14344-10-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
2018-10-24memory-device: forward errors in get_region_size()/get_plugged_size()David Hildenbrand
Let's properly forward the errors, so errors from get_region_size() / get_plugged_size() can be handled. Users right now call both functions after the device has been realized, which is will never fail, so it is fine to continue using error_abort. While at it, remove a leftover error check (suggested by Igor). Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181005092024.14344-8-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
2018-10-24memory-device: use memory device terminology in error messagesDavid Hildenbrand
While we rephrased most error messages, we missed these. Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181005092024.14344-6-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
2018-10-24memory-device: improve "range conflicts" error messageDavid Hildenbrand
Handle id==NULL better and indicate that we are dealing with memory devices. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181005092024.14344-4-david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
2018-10-24memory-device: fix error message when hinted address is too smallDavid Hildenbrand
The "at" should actually be a "before". if (new_addr < address_space_start) -> "can't add memory ... before... $address_space_start" So it looks similar to the other check } else if ((new_addr + size) > address_space_end) -> "can't add memory ... beyond..." Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181005092024.14344-3-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
2018-10-24memory-device: fix alignment error messageDavid Hildenbrand
We're missing "x" after the leading 0. Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181005092024.14344-2-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
2018-06-28memory-device: turn alignment assert into checkDavid Hildenbrand
The start of the address space indicates which maximum alignment is supported by our machine (e.g. ppc, x86 1GB). This is helpful to catch fragmenting guest physical memory in strange fashions. Right now we can crash QEMU by e.g. (there might be easier examples) qemu-system-x86_64 -m 256M,maxmem=20G,slots=2 \ -object memory-backend-file,id=mem0,size=8192M,mem-path=/dev/zero,align=8192M \ -device pc-dimm,id=dimm1,memdev=mem0 Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20180607154705.6316-2-david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2018-05-07pc-dimm: move actual plug/unplug of a memory region to MemoryDeviceDavid Hildenbrand
Registering the memory region for migration has do be done by the owner. There could be cases, where we don't want to migrate the memory. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20180423165126.15441-8-david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
2018-05-07pc-dimm: factor out capacity and slot checks into MemoryDeviceDavid Hildenbrand
Move the checks into memory_device_get_free_addr(). This will check before doing any calculations if we have KVM/vhost slots left and if the total region size would be exceeded. Of course, while at it, make it independent of pc-dimm code. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20180423165126.15441-7-david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
2018-05-07pc-dimm: factor out address search into MemoryDevice codeDavid Hildenbrand
This mainly moves code, but does a handfull of optimizations: - We pass the machine instead of the address space properties - We check the hinted address directly and handle fragmented memory better - We make the search independent of pc-dimm Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20180423165126.15441-6-david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
2018-05-07pc-dimm: factor out MemoryDevice interfaceDavid Hildenbrand
On the qmp level, we already have the concept of memory devices: "query-memory-devices" Right now, we only support NVDIMM and PCDIMM. We want to map other devices later into the address space of the guest. Such device could e.g. be virtio devices. These devices will have a guest memory range assigned but won't be exposed via e.g. ACPI. We want to make them look like memory device, but not glued to pc-dimm. Especially, it will not always be possible to have TYPE_PC_DIMM as a parent class (e.g. virtio devices). Let's use an interface instead. As a first part, convert handling of - qmp_pc_dimm_device_list - get_plugged_memory_size to our new model. plug/unplug stuff etc. will follow later. A memory device will have to provide the following functions: - get_addr(): Necessary, as the property "addr" can e.g. not be used for virtio devices (already defined). - get_plugged_size(): The amount this device offers to the guest as of now. - get_region_size(): Because this can later on be bigger than the plugged size. - fill_device_info(): Fill MemoryDeviceInfo, e.g. for qmp. Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20180423165126.15441-2-david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>