| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
In my "build everything" tree, changing sysemu/sysemu.h triggers a
recompile of some 5400 out of 6600 objects (not counting tests and
objects that don't depend on qemu/osdep.h).
Almost a third of its inclusions are actually superfluous. Delete
them. Downgrade two more to qapi/qapi-types-run-state.h, and move one
from char/serial.h to char/serial.c.
hw/semihosting/config.c, monitor/monitor.c, qdev-monitor.c, and
stubs/semihost.c define variables declared in sysemu/sysemu.h without
including it. The compiler is cool with that, but include it anyway.
This doesn't reduce actual use much, as it's still included into
widely included headers. The next commit will tackle that.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20190812052359.30071-27-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
|
|
In my "build everything" tree, changing sysemu/reset.h triggers a
recompile of some 2600 out of 6600 objects (not counting tests and
objects that don't depend on qemu/osdep.h).
The main culprit is hw/hw.h, which supposedly includes it for
convenience.
Include sysemu/reset.h only where it's needed. Touching it now
recompiles less than 200 objects.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190812052359.30071-9-armbru@redhat.com>
|
|
If xres / yres were specified in QEMU command line, write them as an initial
resolution to the fw-config space on guest reset, which a later BIOS / OVMF
patch can take advantage of.
Signed-off-by: HOU Qiming <hqm03ster@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
Message-id: 20190513115731.17588-4-marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com
[fixed malformed patch]
Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
|
|
Only allow one resolution change per guest boot, which prevents a
crash when the guest writes garbage to the configuration space (e.g.
when rebooting).
Signed-off-by: HOU Qiming <hqm03ster@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
Message-id: 20190513115731.17588-3-marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com
[fixed malformed patch]
Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
|
|
Pulled back the `qemu_create_displaysurface_guestmem` function to create
the display surface so that the guest memory gets properly unmapped.
Signed-off-by: HOU Qiming <hqm03ster@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
Message-id: 20190513115731.17588-2-marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com
[rename the new functions and use QEMU coding style]
Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
|
|
Add vgabios binary to fw_cfg vgaroms.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
|
|
> CID 1393621: (OVERFLOW_BEFORE_WIDEN)
> Potentially overflowing expression "stride * s->height" with type "unsigned
> int" (32 bits, unsigned) is evaluated using +32-bit arithmetic, and then used
> in a context that expects an expression of type "hwaddr" (64 bits, unsigned).
Fix by changing stride from uint32_t to hwaddr.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20180626083120.19515-1-kraxel@redhat.com
|
|
The boot framebuffer is expected to be configured by the firmware, so it
uses fw_cfg as interface. Initialization goes as follows:
(1) Check whenever etc/ramfb is present.
(2) Allocate framebuffer from RAM.
(3) Fill struct RAMFBCfg, write it to etc/ramfb.
Done. You can write stuff to the framebuffer now, and it should appear
automagically on the screen.
Note that this isn't very efficient because it does a full display
update on each refresh. No dirty tracking. Dirty tracking would have
to be active for the whole ram slot, so that wouldn't be very efficient
either. For a boot display which is active for a short time only this
isn't a big deal. As permanent guest display something better should be
used (if possible).
This is the ramfb core code. Some windup is needed for display devices
which want have a ramfb boot display.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20180613122948.18149-2-kraxel@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
|
