Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
stm32f405_soc_initfn() creates six such devices, but
stm32f405_soc_realize() realizes only one. Affects machine
netduinoplus2.
In theory, a device becomes real only on realize. In practice, the
transition from unreal to real is a fuzzy one. The work to make a
device real can be spread between realize methods (fine),
instance_init methods (wrong), and board code wiring up the device
(fine as long as it effectively happens on realize). Depending on
what exactly is done where, a device can work even when we neglect
to realize it.
The five unrealized devices appear to stay unreal: neither MMIO nor
IRQ get wired up.
Fix stm32f405_soc_realize() to realize and wire up all six. Visible
in "info qtree":
bus: main-system-bus
type System
dev: stm32f405-soc, id ""
cpu-type = "cortex-m4-arm-cpu"
dev: stm32f2xx-adc, id ""
gpio-out "sysbus-irq" 1
- mmio ffffffffffffffff/00000000000000ff
+ mmio 0000000040012000/00000000000000ff
dev: stm32f2xx-adc, id ""
gpio-out "sysbus-irq" 1
- mmio ffffffffffffffff/00000000000000ff
+ mmio 0000000040012100/00000000000000ff
dev: stm32f2xx-adc, id ""
gpio-out "sysbus-irq" 1
- mmio ffffffffffffffff/00000000000000ff
+ mmio 0000000040012200/00000000000000ff
dev: stm32f2xx-adc, id ""
gpio-out "sysbus-irq" 1
- mmio ffffffffffffffff/00000000000000ff
+ mmio 0000000040012300/00000000000000ff
dev: stm32f2xx-adc, id ""
gpio-out "sysbus-irq" 1
- mmio 0000000040012000/00000000000000ff
+ mmio 0000000040012400/00000000000000ff
dev: stm32f2xx-adc, id ""
gpio-out "sysbus-irq" 1
- mmio ffffffffffffffff/00000000000000ff
+ mmio 0000000040012500/00000000000000ff
dev: armv7m, id ""
Fixes: 529fc5fd3e18ace8f739afd02dc0953354f39442
Cc: Alistair Francis <alistair@alistair23.me>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <20200609122339.937862-2-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
|
|
Avoid orphan memory regions being added in the /unattached QOM
container.
This commit was produced with the Coccinelle script
scripts/coccinelle/memory-region-housekeeping.cocci.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
|
|
This commit was produced with the Coccinelle script
scripts/coccinelle/memory-region-housekeeping.cocci.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
|
|
The scripts/coccinelle/memory-region-housekeeping.cocci reported:
* TODO [[view:./hw/arm/stm32f205_soc.c::face=ovl-face1::linb=96::colb=4::cole=26][potential use of memory_region_init_rom*() in ./hw/arm/stm32f205_soc.c::96]]
* TODO [[view:./hw/arm/stm32f405_soc.c::face=ovl-face1::linb=98::colb=4::cole=26][potential use of memory_region_init_rom*() in ./hw/arm/stm32f405_soc.c::98]]
We can indeed replace the memory_region_init_ram() and
memory_region_set_readonly() calls by memory_region_init_rom().
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
|
|
The following patch will need to handle properties registration during
class_init time. Let's use a device_class_set_props() setter.
spatch --macro-file scripts/cocci-macro-file.h --sp-file
./scripts/coccinelle/qdev-set-props.cocci --keep-comments --in-place
--dir .
@@
typedef DeviceClass;
DeviceClass *d;
expression val;
@@
- d->props = val
+ device_class_set_props(d, val)
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200110153039.1379601-20-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair@alistair23.me>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1d145c4c13e5fa140caf131232a6f524c88fcd72.1576658572.git.alistair@alistair23.me
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
|