| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Rename the files that used to be iotkit.[ch] to
armsse.[ch] to reflect the fact they new cover
multiple Arm subsystems for embedded.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-8-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
Rename various internal uses of 'iotkit' in hw/arm/iotkit.c to
'armsse', for consistency. The remaining occurences are:
* related to the devices TYPE_IOTKIT_SYSCTL, TYPE_IOTKIT_SYSINFO,
etc, which this refactor is not touching
* references that apply specifically to the IoTKit (like
the lack of a private CPU region)
* the vmstate, which keeps its old "iotkit" name for
migration compatibility reasons
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-7-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
The Arm SSE-200 Subsystem for Embedded is a revised and
extended version of the older IoTKit SoC. Prepare for
adding a model of it by refactoring the IoTKit code into
an abstract base class which contains the functionality,
driven by a class data block specific to each subclass.
(This is the same approach used by the existing bcm283x
SoC family implementation.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-6-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
The Arm IoTKit was effectively the forerunner of a series of
subsystems for embedded SoCs, named the SSE-050, SSE-100 and SSE-200:
https://developer.arm.com/products/system-design/subsystems
These are generally quite similar, though later iterations have
extra devices that earlier ones do not.
We want to add a model of the SSE-200, which means refactoring the
IoTKit code into an abstract base class and subclasses (using the
same design that the bcm283x SoC and Aspeed SoC family
implementations do). As a first step, rename the IoTKit struct and
QOM macros to ARMSSE, which is what we're going to name the base
class. We temporarily retain TYPE_IOTKIT to avoid changing the
code that instantiates a TYPE_IOTKIT device here and then changing
it back again when it is re-introduced as a subclass.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-5-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
The IoTKit doesn't have any MSCs itself but it does need
some wiring to connect the external signals from MSCs
in the outer board model up to the registers and the
NVIC IRQ line.
We also need to expose a MemoryRegion corresponding to
the AHB bus, so that MSCs in the outer board model can
use that as their downstream port. (In the FPGA this is
the "AHB Slave Expansion" ports shown in the block
diagram in the AN505 documentation.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 20180820141116.9118-14-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
|
|
Wire up the system control element's register banks
(sysctl and sysinfo).
This is the last of the previously completely unimplemented
components in the IoTKit.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180820141116.9118-11-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
The IoTKit has a CMSDK timer device that runs on the S32KCLK.
Create this and wire it up.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180820141116.9118-8-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
The IoTKit includes three different instances of the
CMSDK APB watchdog; create and wire them up.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180820141116.9118-7-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
Now we have a model of the CMSDK dual timer, we can wire it
up in the IoTKit.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180820141116.9118-5-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
A cut-and-paste error meant we were incorrectly wiring up the timer1
IRQ to IRQ3. IRQ3 is the interrupt for timer0 -- move timer0 to
IRQ4 where it belongs.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 20180727113854.20283-3-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
QEMU currently crashes when introspecting the "iotkit" device and
runnint "info qtree" afterwards, e.g. when running QEMU like this:
echo "{'execute':'qmp_capabilities'} {'execute':'device-list-properties'," \
"'arguments':{'typename':'iotkit'}}" "{'execute': 'human-monitor-command', " \
"'arguments': {'command-line': 'info qtree'}}" | \
aarch64-softmmu/qemu-system-aarch64 -M none,accel=qtest -qmp stdio
Use the new functions object_initialize_child() and sysbus_init_child_obj()
to make sure that all objects get cleaned up correctly when the instances
are destroyed.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-id: 1531745974-17187-5-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
|
|
The interrupt outputs from the MPC in the IoTKit and the expansion
MPCs in the board must be wired up to the security controller, and
also all ORed together to produce a single line to the NVIC.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180620132032.28865-8-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
Wire up the one MPC that is part of the IoTKit itself. For the
moment we don't wire up its interrupt line.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180620132032.28865-7-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
Coverity (CID1390573) spots that we forgot to free the
gpioname strings in a loop in the iotkit realize function.
Correct the error.
This isn't a significant leak, because this function
only ever runs once.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20180427110137.19304-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
Model the Arm IoT Kit documented in
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ecm0601256/index.html
The Arm IoT Kit is a subsystem which includes a CPU and some devices,
and is intended be extended by adding extra devices to form a
complete system. It is used in the MPS2 board's AN505 image for the
Cortex-M33.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180220180325.29818-19-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
