aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/docs/interop/nbd.txt
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2022-05-12nbd/server: Allow MULTI_CONN for shared writable exportsEric Blake
According to the NBD spec, a server that advertises NBD_FLAG_CAN_MULTI_CONN promises that multiple client connections will not see any cache inconsistencies: when properly separated by a single flush, actions performed by one client will be visible to another client, regardless of which client did the flush. We always satisfy these conditions in qemu - even when we support multiple clients, ALL clients go through a single point of reference into the block layer, with no local caching. The effect of one client is instantly visible to the next client. Even if our backend were a network device, we argue that any multi-path caching effects that would cause inconsistencies in back-to-back actions not seeing the effect of previous actions would be a bug in that backend, and not the fault of caching in qemu. As such, it is safe to unconditionally advertise CAN_MULTI_CONN for any qemu NBD server situation that supports parallel clients. Note, however, that we don't want to advertise CAN_MULTI_CONN when we know that a second client cannot connect (for historical reasons, qemu-nbd defaults to a single connection while nbd-server-add and QMP commands default to unlimited connections; but we already have existing means to let either style of NBD server creation alter those defaults). This is visible by no longer advertising MULTI_CONN for 'qemu-nbd -r' without -e, as in the iotest nbd-qemu-allocation. The harder part of this patch is setting up an iotest to demonstrate behavior of multiple NBD clients to a single server. It might be possible with parallel qemu-io processes, but I found it easier to do in python with the help of libnbd, and help from Nir and Vladimir in writing the test. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Suggested-by: Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> Suggested-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <v.sementsov-og@mail.ru> Message-Id: <20220512004924.417153-3-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2021-11-19docs: Spell QEMU all capsPhilippe Mathieu-Daudé
Replace Qemu -> QEMU. Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20211118143401.4101497-1-philmd@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-10-30nbd: Add new qemu:allocation-depth metadata contextEric Blake
'qemu-img map' provides a way to determine which extents of an image come from the top layer vs. inherited from a backing chain. This is useful information worth exposing over NBD. There is a proposal to add a QMP command block-dirty-bitmap-populate which can create a dirty bitmap that reflects allocation information, at which point the qemu:dirty-bitmap:NAME metadata context can expose that information via the creation of a temporary bitmap, but we can shorten the effort by adding a new qemu:allocation-depth metadata context that does the same thing without an intermediate bitmap (this patch does not eliminate the need for that proposal, as it will have other uses as well). While documenting things, remember that although the NBD protocol has NBD_OPT_SET_META_CONTEXT, the rest of its documentation refers to 'metadata context', which is a more apt description of what is actually being used by NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS: the user is requesting metadata by passing one or more context names. So I also touched up some existing wording to prefer the term 'metadata context' where it makes sense. Note that this patch does not actually enable any way to request a server to enable this context; that will come in the next patch. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20201027050556.269064-10-eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
2020-09-17docs/: fix some comment spelling errorszhaolichang
I found that there are many spelling errors in the comments of qemu, so I used the spellcheck tool to check the spelling errors and finally found some spelling errors in the docs folder. Signed-off-by: zhaolichang <zhaolichang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20200917075029.313-4-zhaolichang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
2019-09-05nbd: Prepare for NBD_CMD_FLAG_FAST_ZEROEric Blake
Commit fe0480d6 and friends added BDRV_REQ_NO_FALLBACK as a way to avoid wasting time on a preliminary write-zero request that will later be rewritten by actual data, if it is known that the write-zero request will use a slow fallback; but in doing so, could not optimize for NBD. The NBD specification is now considering an extension that will allow passing on those semantics; this patch updates the new protocol bits and 'qemu-nbd --list' output to recognize the bit, as well as the new errno value possible when using the new flag; while upcoming patches will improve the client to use the feature when present, and the server to advertise support for it. The NBD spec recommends (but not requires) that ENOTSUP be avoided for all but failures of a fast zero (the only time it is mandatory to avoid an ENOTSUP failure is when fast zero is supported but not requested during write zeroes; the questionable use is for ENOTSUP to other actions like a normal write request). However, clients that get an unexpected ENOTSUP will either already be treating it the same as EINVAL, or may appreciate the extra bit of information. We were equally loose for returning EOVERFLOW in more situations than recommended by the spec, so if it turns out to be a problem in practice, a later patch can tighten handling for both error codes. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190823143726.27062-3-eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> [eblake: tweak commit message, also handle EOPNOTSUPP]
2019-09-05nbd: Advertise multi-conn for shared read-only connectionsEric Blake
The NBD specification defines NBD_FLAG_CAN_MULTI_CONN, which can be advertised when the server promises cache consistency between simultaneous clients (basically, rules that determine what FUA and flush from one client are able to guarantee for reads from another client). When we don't permit simultaneous clients (such as qemu-nbd without -e), the bit makes no sense; and for writable images, we probably have a lot more work before we can declare that actions from one client are cache-consistent with actions from another. But for read-only images, where flush isn't changing any data, we might as well advertise multi-conn support. What's more, advertisement of the bit makes it easier for clients to determine if 'qemu-nbd -e' was in use, where a second connection will succeed rather than hang until the first client goes away. This patch affects qemu as server in advertising the bit. We may want to consider patches to qemu as client to attempt parallel connections for higher throughput by spreading the load over those connections when a server advertises multi-conn, but for now sticking to one connection per nbd:// BDS is okay. See also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1708300 Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190815185024.7010-1-eblake@redhat.com> [eblake: tweak blockdev-nbd.c to not request shared when writable, fix iotest 233] Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
2019-01-04nbd: Document timeline of various featuresEric Blake
It can be useful to figure out which NBD protocol features are exposed by a server, as well as what features a client will take advantage of if available, for a given qemu release. It's not always precise to base features on version numbers (thanks to downstream backports), but any documentation is better than making users search through git logs themselves. This patch originally stemmed from a request to document that pristine 3.0 has a known bug where NBD_OPT_LIST_META_CONTEXT with 0 queries forgot to advertise an available "qemu:dirty-bitmap" context, but documenting bugs like this (or the fact that 3.0 also botched NBD_CMD_CACHE) gets to be too much details, especially since buggy releases will be less likely connection targets over time. Instead, I chose to just remind users to check stable release branches. Suggested-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181215135324.152629-3-eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
2018-06-21docs/interop: add nbd.txtVladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Describe new metadata namespace: "qemu". Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Message-Id: <20180609151758.17343-7-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> [eblake: grammar tweaks] Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>