aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/docs/devel/ebpf_rss.rst
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-08-02docs/devel/ebpf_rss.rst: Format literals correctlyPeter Maydell
In rST markup, single backticks `like this` represent "interpreted text", which can be handled as a bunch of different things if tagged with a specific "role": https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html#interpreted-text (the most common one for us is "reference to a URL, which gets hyperlinked"). The default "role" if none is specified is "title_reference", intended for references to book or article titles, and it renders into the HTML as <cite>...</cite> (usually comes out as italics). To format a literal (generally rendered as fixed-width font), double-backticks are required. ebpf_rss.rst gets this wrong in a few places; correct them. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Message-id: 20210726142338.31872-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org
2021-06-04docs: Added eBPF documentation.Andrew Melnychenko
Signed-off-by: Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@daynix.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Melnychenko <andrew@daynix.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>